You think that is the case to the end or just adding a bit of hesitation to get teams make their decisions little faster (join before its full)? Anyway, that Western / Eastern Conference is really good idea and that's what I hope will become true, I don't really care how many teams.
I dont know, it can be a incluence for euro clubs to join but I dont think it is main or even so important.
IMO, KHL thinks that 32 is ideal number of clubs. Can you imagine league with 40-60 clubs? What about schedulle, quality, etc? As I and ult said, russian clubs can leave KHL, but other russian clubs will substitute them, maybe some RUS KHL team will be substitute by euro club. Who knows? On the other hand, I dont believe we will have less than 16 RUS clubs. Dreaming about 5 FIN/SWE clubs in KHL is just a dream nothing more. Ult is right here.
Good luck getting the money out of Londoners pockets. That's what you're aiming for, right?
And I'm not against the expansion, I just don't like it that right now, 6 years after emerge of KHL, and its obvious growth, here come the people (not you personally) who laughed at it in the beginning, and saying that we should get rid of this and that in order to "compete with NHL". I think KHL is doing great, and moving in the right direction with good speed, and without any of the things those people complain about. No need to rush things and destroy the work of this years.
Don't worry, I am aware that some Russian teams have no place in KHL. Some cities are just too small. But when the time is right they'll be moved to more proper locations, like Sochi, Tyumen, Krasnoyarsk. And everything there will be of top-notch quality even by the world standards.
agree and bold is the most imporstant message.
And you wonder why Finns and Swedes aren´t that keen on joining to help on the number one goal?
You say that the foreign players restrictions are moved off after Sochi. International hockey doesn´t stop on there. What if Russia ends up in disaster at Sochi? If the RHF has power to control teams now why wouldn´t they do it after Sochi? What is the quarantee that RHF doesn´t make any other rule changes over the years to help and secure the Russian national team. And wanting to keep more than half of the teams kind of goes to the same category of securing Russian hockey. But naturally Russians want to do what is best for Russian hockey. And even Jokerit is going to play with their money so... But at this time it just really feels that Jokerit is more of Russian league team based on Helsinki than Finnish club playing in KHL.
But I try to be open minded towards this. Intresting this is going to be if nothing else
I can write loooooong posts on this topic. Really. There is a thread about KHL aftech Sochi, I recommend it.
Many Qs, but I will be short. All depends on money, right? KHL will take control over FHR after Sochi = KHL will govern KHL and FHR. I mean, ppl loyal to KHL will govern FHR. IIHF - Fasel has no problem with KHL´s western expansion now, Kummola (vicepresident IIHF, head of FIN association) said that Jokerit joining KHL is good for international hockey. ????? Why did they change the mind?
Yes, everything can happen. KHL´s plan can fail, but I give more chances that KHL´s plan will be succesfull.
For those who follow KHL closely. Very interesting thing.... FHR delegated the right to govern the league to KHL for 3 years (2008-2011). IMO after 3yrs (in 2011), the deal was re-signed for next 3yrs (current reglemet is for 2011/12 - 13/14 seasons). The Q, when the problems with limits/schedulling/foreign goalies started? Was not in summer 2011? When the deal was re-signed? If it was, then the deal ends after following season, KHL can be independent from FHR.. or to sign new deal which is good for KHL (because FHR is govern KHL ). Just crazy idea...