Edge
Kris King's Ghost
There's also this guy on Frolunda that reminds me of Henrik. I swear, he could almost be his twin.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d90/10d9034f00ff93d62711ca9ed1272c292dc0dd91" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d90/10d9034f00ff93d62711ca9ed1272c292dc0dd91" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Shattenkirk is problematic because defense isn't really the problem, as much as we harp on it. He's good from his own blueline in, and he's good from within the offensive blueline. He sucks at transition.
The instinct is to play him with a "defensive defenseman" so he'll be stuck with Staal or Smith, when really, Shattenkirk should be with a puck-mover.
Unfortunately, we don't really have any puck-movers on the left. Skjei thinks he's a rover, but he's a defenseive defenseman, which is why he's better with a PMD on his right. Notice how he sucked with Shattenkirk? Because Shattenkirk isn't a PMD.
ADA-Shattenkirk would be the absolute ****.
We'll have to agree to disagree about Shattenkirk being good from his own blue line in. Maybe you're talking about with the puck, which is a different story. But without the puck, I think he's the worst defenseman on the team. A lot of it has to do with a sheer unwillingness to engage in battles in front of the net.
Completely agree with you. And to add to what you said, Shattenkirk has often been caught flat footed as well. I don’t remember if he’s always been this slow or the knee is still a problem but he’s been dreadful out there.Shattenkirk was always soft and a liability in the defensive end. His PP prowess and ability to jump up into the play more than mitigated it. I don't know if the knee problem is persisting or what, but Shattenkirk has no jump whatsoever to his skating. And even regardless of that, the writing was on the wall with regards to where this team was heading in the summer of 2017 and the signing should've never been made in the first place.
Next time we play, watch Shattenkirk in iso.
I guarantee you'll see him breaking up plays and consistently being the right position, and then having no idea what to do with the puck.
I just feel like I live in crazy town when you things like this get brought up. I watch him in ISO constantly, and what I repeatedly see is the guy getting walked, making half-assed (or maybe just weak) attempts at separating guys from the puck, and poorly positioning himself between his goaltender and attacking defenseman.
Honest question, but if his "in zone heat maps" look so good, is it completely impossible for there to be another explanation? Similar to how these recent Ranger teams didn't shoot all that much, is it possible that Shattenkirk gives up high quality chances that end up going in on the first attempt (vice on the rebound)? Shots from bad spots beget more shots, hence, more heat.
My stance, as always, is that stats need to augment observation. In situations like this, where the stats and observation are in such stark disagreement, my opinion is that you need to start looking for other explanations.
Shattenkirk is a terrible defensive player.
Stats need to augment observation, yes, but I think in this case, you're seeing what's in line with your preconceived notions.
Shattenkirk to me, from viewings, is a player that struggles to move the puck. I almost never see him get "walked." He could be better in front of his own net, but we know for a fact that these shots aren't happening that often.
I think in terms of the eye test, Shattenkirk is a player whose mistakes get put under a microscope because of his reputation. He made a week play yesterday that led to a goal against. That's what everyone remembers. What nobody remembers is that it was 1 of 3 high-danger chances against he was on the ice for. Carolina had 16. It was the best rate of any Rangers D yesterday.
That's not to say he isn't a flawed player and that I'm not a little annoyed with him right now. But I think there's been a severe misidentification of what those flaws are.
ADA was springing guys on homerun passes left and right. Has Shattenkirk ever done that in a Rangers uniform?
He played 7 minutes against Carolina, so 3 high-danger chances when he was on the ice is pretty significant.Stats need to augment observation, yes, but I think in this case, you're seeing what's in line with your preconceived notions.
Shattenkirk to me, from viewings, is a player that struggles to move the puck. I almost never see him get "walked." He could be better in front of his own net, but we know for a fact that these shots aren't happening that often.
I think in terms of the eye test, Shattenkirk is a player whose mistakes get put under a microscope because of his reputation. He made a week play yesterday that led to a goal against. That's what everyone remembers. What nobody remembers is that it was 1 of 3 high-danger chances against he was on the ice for. Carolina had 16. It was the best rate of any Rangers D yesterday.
That's not to say he isn't a flawed player and that I'm not a little annoyed with him right now. But I think there's been a severe misidentification of what those flaws are.
ADA was springing guys on homerun passes left and right. Has Shattenkirk ever done that in a Rangers uniform?
FWIW, I'm willing to admit that my pre-conceived notions about Shattenkirk might be clouding my observations, but I have made a conscious effort to put that aside. I wanted to be happy about him coming here, and I thought he'd do a lot to relieve pressure from McD, but he's been really, really disappointing to me. Reminds me a lot of Tom Poti, which is obviously not a good thing.
That said, it's not even clear that you're advocating for him. You're basically saying that he's not good at the one thing he was brought here to be good at (puck moving, PP QBing). The guy doesn't even have a good slapper from the point.
ADA has all the leash in the world from me by the way. I want him playing every night.
He played 7 minutes against Carolina, so 3 high-danger chances when he was on the ice is pretty significant.
Shattenkirk played (and excelled) as a #1B/#3 defenceman on the Blues every season between 2011-12 and 2015-16, and they were one of the top teams in the league each and every year, never scoring below 100 point pace (102 point pace in 2012-13 being the lowest score) and being a top-3 regular season team in 3/5 seasons (finishing 4th and 6th in the other years).Shattenkirk is a low 4 high 5 who's a PP specialist. That's all he'll ever be and it's exactly what he was in St. Louis.
Considering the fact that his minutes were shielded, I am not sure calling him a 1B is accurateShattenkirk played (and excelled) as a #1B/#3 defenceman on the Blues every season between 2011-12 and 2015-16, and they were one of the top teams in the league each and every year, never scoring below 100 point pace (102 point pace in 2012-13 being the lowest score) and being a top-3 regular season team in 3/5 seasons (finishing 4th and 6th in the other years).
And awful at defendingShattenkirk isn't an offensive defenseman. He's just a defenseman who happens to be really good at shooting.
This is patently false. Shattenkirk got to STL four seasons before Parayko did.Shattenkirk is a low 4 high 5 who's a PP specialist. That's all he'll ever be and it's exactly what he was in St. Louis.
I say give him another 3 games and if he doesn't get his head out of his ass by then, send him down to the Pack so he can find his game.
If that's even possible..