Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,070
- 40,920
So Drury finished gutting the entire scouting department.
That's not what happened. They were approached by other teams for better positions. They weren't fired.
So Drury finished gutting the entire scouting department.
Maybe, but their results thus far have been telling.This is such a narrow-minded view. Just because someone was a good player, doesn't mean they're good at developing other players.
The same is true the other way around. Tanner Glass and Jed Ortmeyer's skills on the ice are not really indicative of their ability to help others develop. That doesn't mean they'er good at it per se, but this notion that a 4th liner by definition cannot develop top prospects is flawed.
Maybe, but their results thus far have been telling.
My comment wasn't meant as a negative, by the way. I feel like that was something missing from when Gorton took over was that they still kept the same head scouts. Drury should be allowed to put his own hires in those spots because he has a different mindset than Gorton. When the front office change happened and they wanted to changes top to bottom this was a part of it. Different scouting philosophies and minds otherwise it's still bringing in the same kind of players and then nothing really changes.That's not what happened. They were approached by other teams for better positions. They weren't fired.
Gorton had put a lot of the superstructure in place when he replaced Sather. Slats was barely awake the last few years before he officially retired. Switch to Drury was much different.My comment wasn't meant as a negative, by the way. I feel like that was something missing from when Gorton took over was that they still kept the same head scouts. Drury should be allowed to put his own hires in those spots because he has a different mindset than Gorton. When the front office change happened and they wanted to changes top to bottom this was a part of it. Different scouting philosophies and minds otherwise it's still bringing in the same kind of players and then nothing really changes.
The team's record at drafting quality NHL players, at least in the past couple decades, is pretty strong. They have failed to draft true star-caliber skaters, for sure, but we've done a pretty consistently good job churning out players with picks from the mid and late rounds.Not sad since our scouting department's 1st round draft pick record is abysmal. I think we have like 2 players with over 500+ point played in the last 30 years from all rounds. Derek Stepan and Marc Savard. 500+ games list is JT Miller, Kreider, Fast, MDZ, Stepan, Weise, Anisimov, Staal, Korpikoski, Dubinsky, Callahan, Tyutin, Zidlicky, Dominic Moore, Henke, Malhotra, Mike York, Savard, Eric Boulton, Sundstrom, and Marchment. That's 0.7 decent NHL players a year. I dunno, maybe that's actually good? Sounds like a garbage number to me.
Gretzky was a terrible coach, and Phil Esposito was a terrible GM. It obviously remains to be seen whether the current crop of young Rangers is successful, but you don’t play over 500 games in the NHL In the modern era without understanding the skillset and mentality required to succeed. Scotty Bowman never even played professional hockey and he read the game as well as well as anyone during his time as a coach.When Tanner Glass is helping these prospects I am not expecting much sadly. They need guys with more skill to develop them. Imagine if Othmann has a Tanner Glass type of career.
quick cursory look - Devils have 8 players with 500+ points in the last 30 years to our measly 2. Devils have only 18 players with 500+ games to our 21 but at a delta of only 3, I'd much prefer 4x the amount of 500+ point players.The team's record at drafting quality NHL players, at least in the past couple decades, is pretty strong. They have failed to draft true star-caliber skaters, for sure, but we've done a pretty consistently good job churning out players with picks from the mid and late rounds.
Really, it's the McIlrath and Jessiman picks (particularly the latter) that color the perception of the terrible drafting. Had they drafted Tarasenko instead of McIlrath, like all the fans wanted, and picked basically any player other than Jessiman--then I think most people would look at this organization as one that drafts well. Like keep all the players the same but swap the two I mentioned for Tarasenko and one of Getzlaf, Dustin Brown, or Parise, and it probably seems way better. I'm not suggesting anyone excuse or overlook those picks, I just think it's really interesting how two high-profile whiffs in 20 or so years really makes everything look so bad.
Gretzky was a terrible coach, and Phil Esposito was a terrible GM. It obviously remains to be seen whether the current crop of young Rangers is successful, but you don’t play over 500 games in the NHL In the modern era without understanding the skillset and mentality required to succeed. Scotty Bowman never even played professional hockey and he read the game as well as well as anyone during his time as a coach.
Moral of the story is do not trade away your draft picks or ye will have no franchise 500 pt scorers that were home grown. Every team out there has at least 2 blown first rounders.....maybe more . Correct me if I am wrong.quick cursory look - Devils have 8 players with 500+ points in the last 30 years to our measly 2. Devils have only 18 players with 500+ games to our 21 but at a delta of only 3, I'd much prefer 4x the amount of 500+ point players.
The islanders have 7 players with 500+ points, 30 players with 500+ games
The flyers have 8 players with 500+ points, only 16 players with 500+ games
So I think two players with 500+ points in the last 30 years for the Rangers is quite abysmal as a historic record of our drafting. Give us a score of 3 for Henke. Sure we have some good players of late but I don't think that absolves the organization from a history of mediocrity at the draft table.
Moral of the story is do not trade away your draft picks or ye will have no franchise 500 pt scorers that were home grown. Every team out there has at least 2 blown first rounders.....maybe more . Correct me if I am wrong.
Cal Foote in 2017 over Josh Norris and Robert Thomas. Foote was a late lottery pick at #14.Everyone always raves about the Tampa Bay Lightning but they also picked Brett Connolly and Slater Koekkoek in the top-10. No team is perfect.
That's not the point.
Doesn't mean we couldn't use an upgrade in our player development staff.
I think that goes without saying. But note from my original list, Derek Stepan and Marc Savard aren't even 1st round picks so if you want to narrow the lense, the Rangers have ZERO 500+ point players drafted in the first round in the last 30 years. JT Miller and Chris Kreider will probably break that curse soon enough though but that is a frightening fact about our drafting.Moral of the story is do not trade away your draft picks or ye will have no franchise 500 pt scorers that were home grown. Every team out there has at least 2 blown first rounders.....maybe more . Correct me if I am wrong.
I think that goes without saying. But note from my original list, Derek Stepan and Marc Savard aren't even 1st round picks so if you want to narrow the lense, the Rangers have ZERO 500+ point players drafted in the first round in the last 30 years. JT Miller and Chris Kreider will probably break that curse soon enough though but that is a frightening fact about our drafting.
I think we should have the largest far reaching scouting staff in the league considering the franchise value . We should be turning over every rock for a prospect . We need Euro scouts and junior scouts and college scouts along with of course our NHL scouts ......we need scouting reports and visual on every player ....LOL.....and maybe you can have too many ?Ok, who would you target to replace them?
I think we should have the largest far reaching scouting staff in the league considering the franchise value . We should be turning over every rock for a prospect . We need Euro scouts and junior scouts and college scouts along with of course our NHL scouts ......we need scouting reports and visual on every player ....LOL.....and maybe you can have too many ?
Drury felt that he had squeezed Maxwell down to the last drop, and it was time for him to go. The feeling was mutual for Maxwell, but he thanked Drury for giving him his cup of coffee in the bigs.Guessing Drury didn't have enough time last season to replace both the amateur and pro scouting departments. Drury prefers the freshly roasted, freshly ground, Italian press coffee and the writing was on the wall for these two guys.
Lias Andersson is just as bad as Jessiman or McIlrathThe team's record at drafting quality NHL players, at least in the past couple decades, is pretty strong. They have failed to draft true star-caliber skaters, for sure, but we've done a pretty consistently good job churning out players with picks from the mid and late rounds.
Really, it's the McIlrath and Jessiman picks (particularly the latter) that color the perception of the terrible drafting. Had they drafted Tarasenko instead of McIlrath, like all the fans wanted, and picked basically any player other than Jessiman--then I think most people would look at this organization as one that drafts well. Like keep all the players the same but swap the two I mentioned for Tarasenko and one of Getzlaf, Dustin Brown, or Parise, and it probably seems way better. I'm not suggesting anyone excuse or overlook those picks, I just think it's really interesting how two high-profile whiffs in 20 or so years really makes everything look so bad.
Lias Andersson is just as bad as Jessiman or McIlrath
He was bad, but the Jessiman pick will always be unmatched because of the sheer quality of basically all of the other players taken around him.Lias Andersson is just as bad as Jessiman or McIlrath