Bring Back Bucky
Registered User
Nobody puts Brent in a cornerI’m just telling you what I feel. Since we’re telling people what to do, If you don’t like it don’t respond.
Nobody puts Brent in a cornerI’m just telling you what I feel. Since we’re telling people what to do, If you don’t like it don’t respond.
If he scores 1-2 in each of 4 play off rounds, he won’t be signing here.I know I shat a LOT on Brown in this thread.
But 3 goals in the last 7 games... has me raising my eyebrow a bit.
If he can pot 1-2 more by the seasons end, and another 1-2 each round of the playoffs, I'll be ready to change my tune on him.
I don't think Henrique is a real possibility. I like him though, so it would be nice if they could get him locked up. Carrick would be fine if he signs for what a 4th liner/13th forward type should (ie, league minimum), but if he gets an offer for any more than that, I say "thanks for your contributions", and move along. We need to keep saving on our bottom line as long as we are still trying to fill holes in other areas of the roster.If he continues his strong play a near league minimum deal wouldn't be the worst idea. Not sure we would keep Carrick or Henrique.
I agree with you. It is like Bjugstad. Someone will give him more and we will have to find some bargains or move out some $$.I don't think Henrique is a real possibility. I like him though, so it would be nice if they could get him locked up. Carrick would be fine if he signs for what a 4th liner/13th forward type should (ie, league minimum), but if he gets an offer for any more than that, I say "thanks for your contributions", and move along. We need to keep saving on our bottom line as long as we are still trying to fill holes in other areas of the roster.
This.I don't think Henrique is a real possibility. I like him though, so it would be nice if they could get him locked up. Carrick would be fine if he signs for what a 4th liner/13th forward type should (ie, league minimum), but if he gets an offer for any more than that, I say "thanks for your contributions", and move along. We need to keep saving on our bottom line as long as we are still trying to fill holes in other areas of the roster.
The waive thing was never really logical. He was always worth his 775k. His low point was having to get healthy scratched.Imagine going from waive this guy to we can't afford this guy!
Connor Brown isn't blocking any prospects. It should say more about the prospects that they can't seem to make it. But Foegele is likely gone next year. Janmark could go. There's lots of ways to get Holloway up that don't include Conor Brown.Placeholding Connor Brown serves no purpose beyond parking our prospect talent like Holloway who should be in the show instead. Would rather the Oilers work to retain Carrick at league minimum, can perform the same roles and punch donkeys and finish hits.
Brown is talked up as some kind of complete player in all his threads but he's not that at all. He's somebody now that ducks hits, isn't physical, and brings very little identity. Brown is getting by on good reads, knowing where puck is going, and getting to those spots. Theres some value in that and it keeps him in the league but this is a player at this point that checks off no intangibles other than pk and has not been particularly good at that.
Hopefully Brown delivers something in playoffs and continues to have a run but move on regardless.
Connor Brown will land somewhere with a team that are building youngers and might want to have him around. I think nobody has even asked Connor Brown if he's willing to take league minimum. People realize that cap artistry not withstanding he is banking 4M for one season here?
The Cult of Connor Brown will land him more than league minimum somewhere else. It still will.
I wonder if Holloway or Lavoie would feel the same way. They would be playing, in the NHL, on other clubs. Doesn't just mean Brown specifically but a Holland run team is going with all vets over youth. I get it from a one more time shot pov but it stymies development of any of the org prospects. Fact of the matter is they are not here.Connor Brown isn't blocking any prospects. It should say more about the prospects that they can't seem to make it. But Foegele is likely gone next year. Janmark could go. There's lots of ways to get Holloway up that don't include Conor Brown.
I'm not saying sign him or don't sign him. Just that I don't think he's blocking anyone.
I'd argue that if Connor Browns 9/10 minutes a night at RW is hampering Dylan Holloway's development process as the teams top prospect, then they have bigger issues.I wonder if Holloway or Lavoie would feel the same way. They would be playing, in the NHL, on other clubs. Doesn't just mean Brown specifically but a Holland run team is going with all vets over youth. I get it from a one more time shot pov but it stymies development of any of the org prospects. Fact of the matter is they are not here.
There are a few things really going against these guys since Knoblauch came in.I'd argue that if Connor Browns 9/10 minutes a night at RW is hampering Dylan Holloway's development process as the teams top prospect, then they have bigger issues.
I'd be more inclined to agree that Janmark, Foegele, Ryan, Kane, McLeod pose far more of an issue to Holloway making the team than Connor Brown.
Do I think Lavoie has earned a shot? Absolutely. But if you can retain cheap depth like Brown at the same time, why wouldn't you? With the teams history of successful prospects, I think it just as likely that Lavoie has far less success in the NHL than Brown has had thus far in his career than him becoming an impact player of any sort.
Good points. Especially the first two.There are a few things really going against these guys since Knoblauch came in.
1. First and foremost he came in to a tire fire. He didn't have time to be going through the growing pains of younger players
2. Injuries. Generally speaking you end up with injuries then the coach becomes forced to play younger players more. We haven't exactly had injuries for this to happen.
3. Trade deadline came and we added more veteran players. Plus the addition of Perry earlier.
I think Carrick is a no brainer. An excellent 4th line center.If he continues his strong play a near league minimum deal wouldn't be the worst idea. Not sure we would keep Carrick or Henrique.
Can't agree with the bolded at all. the only way an org changes its prospect development is by doing it, and using them, The bolded is antithetical to development.I'd argue that if Connor Browns 9/10 minutes a night at RW is hampering Dylan Holloway's development process as the teams top prospect, then they have bigger issues.
I'd be more inclined to agree that Janmark, Foegele, Ryan, Kane, McLeod pose far more of an issue to Holloway making the team than Connor Brown.
Do I think Lavoie has earned a shot? Absolutely. But if you can retain cheap depth like Brown at the same time, why wouldn't you? With the teams history of successful prospects, I think it just as likely that Lavoie has far less success in the NHL than Brown has had thus far in his career than him becoming an impact player of any sort.
But Holloways injuries have also been a sign of a player trying to find that extra edge and desperation everywhere due to the situation he's in where he knows any game here could be his last. Very untenable position to put kids in. Be better than all these other guys, be better instantly, or you're riding pine or sent down or scratched. Holloway has seen this two years running now. Wouldn't treat a dog like that.Good points. Especially the first two.
The team has been pretty damn healthy this year, luckily. In fact, Holloway was one of the few guys who needed to miss significant time to injury.
He's been given multiple shots and has wound up injured everytime so far. That isn't because he's being treated poorly by the team, it's because he's as of now an injury prone player. If he's able to stay healthy and produce in the NHL, he will stick, regardless of whether or not Connor Brown is here.But Holloways injuries have also been a sign of a player trying to find that extra edge and desperation everywhere due to the situation he's in where he knows any game here could be his last. Very untenable position to put kids in. Be better than all these other guys, be better instantly, or you're riding pine or sent down or scratched. Holloway has seen this two years running now. Wouldn't treat a dog like that.
I can name any number of players here that didn't show much scoring initially, or much pts. Even a guy like Ryan Smyth. Both had identical first seasons. Yet Smyth correctly got constant rotation in the lineup sophomore season and blossomed to his peak. Holloway with similar rook season is riding pine and busses somewhere. Kinds sucks for him.
Then you let him go if he has good playoffs and prices himself out. They signed him essentially for the playoffs.The waive thing was never really logical. He was always worth his 775k. His low point was having to get healthy scratched.
I'd say at this point Brown wants to see how the playoffs go. He will likely get more than league minimum. I don't want to sign him as I like that he's fighting for his NHL future and will be hungry in the playoffs. He's heating up and has confidence.
Where is Pissy?I would 100% keep Brown, and Carrick for that matter. Janmark, Foegele, Henrique, are all questionable at best. If you put Holloway at Foegele spot for almost $2M less. Brown is back at $1M. You can run back most of a line up that is pretty darn good. If Ceci is moved then you can manage to even improve if you want to.
View attachment 845619