Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,055
- 9,244
For what it's worth, I was being sincere about Stoner actually being a guy who would hold value for you guys as a bottom pairing guy. He would be an upgrade.
I've followed you guys closely this year, and I'm familiar with Stoner being in the same division as ANA. He's the type of tough, big bodied, stay at home Dman you guys could use. He is who he is, a bottom pairing guy but the added toughness would help your back end and help you out on the PK.
But I do understand the negative value on his $3.25 M cap hit for the next two years.
Oh I know. I don't know much about him as a player but from what I've heard he's a competent bottom pairing guy. At the same price I'd prefer him over Hunwick.
But in a cap world you shouldn't take a player who has market negative value for free unless it's a clear enough upgrade you can ignore it(and negative value players rarely are clear enough upgrades), try to get a market value trade or don't take the player, and we're not really in the position where the upgrade is vital anyway.
And to Anaheim's credit they've figured out a way to fit everyone in at the moment, as tight as they are(and as unfortunate as it is for Despres, I liked him) so they're not forced to give in to the market price on paying to get rid of Stoner either.
So like I said for the right price I wouldn't mind taking Stoner but Anaheim doesn't have to give into that price, and it appears this Montour/Kapanen discussion is going nowhere anyway.