Value of: Kaapo Kakko

[Blackhawkswincup]

Blackhawks probably add a 4th or take back some salary or something but I'd like to see this deal get done.
Change of scenery for both players.

I think cost difference is enough for Hawks not to have to add

Kakko has $2.1M AAV thru next year
Reichel has $1.2M AAV thru next year

Hawks give Rangers some cap room (Small but still) cap room relief in deal

 

[VeteranPresence]

We're quite literally 3, yes THREE, games into the season.

First time I see a projection on point after three game lol Huberdeau is on pace for 123 pts this season.

You guys know he did play last year, right?

2023-24: 0.31 PPG (25 point pace)
2024-25: 0.33 PPG (27 point pace)

If you don't think 61 games (really 221, if you exclude his outlier 40 point season) is enough, I'm not sure what to tell you. The guy is a bust, move on now before his draft pedigree is even more of a distant memory.

 

[StuckOutHere]

Liljegren for Kakko?

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

You guys know he did play last year, right?

2023-24: 0.31 PPG (25 point pace)
2024-25: 0.33 PPG (27 point pace)

If you don't think 61 games (really 221, if you exclude his outlier 40 point season) is enough, I'm not sure what to tell you. The guy is a bust, move on now before his draft pedigree is even more of a distant memory.

So what about the year before that? Or inconvenient for your flawed narrative?

Liljegren for Kakko?

Last thing we need is a RHD.

 

[Sticktape]

Kakko for Holtz

 

[bernmeister]

He’s already an established good third line winger. Those go for at least a second. His value won’t become 0.

and this is in a vacuum
he has mo value to Rs w/bread not getting extended

 

[VeteranPresence]

So what about the year before that? Or inconvenient for your flawed narrative?

You mean the outlier season I already addressed...?

If you don't think 61 games (really 221, if you exclude his outlier 40 point season) is enough, I'm not sure what to tell you.

It would seem yours is the flawed argument if all you can do is point to a single year and shout that it's the real trend and, you know, not all the other ones around it...

2019-20: 0.35 PPG
2020-21: 0.35 PPG
2021-22: 0.41 PPG
2022-23: 0.48 PPG
2023-24: 0.31 PPG
2024-25: 0.33 PPG

We know what this player is, he's a bust, move on and just be glad Laf rebounded and is going to cover the bet. Not every team hits on their picks and the mighty Rangers are no different.

 

[Albatros]

Trading a useful player just because he was drafted too high would be moronic.

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

You mean the outlier season I already addressed...?



It would seem yours is the flawed argument if all you can do is point to a single year and shout that it's the real trend and, you know, not all the other ones around it...

2019-20: 0.35 PPG
2020-21: 0.35 PPG
2021-22: 0.41 PPG
2022-23: 0.48 PPG
2023-24: 0.31 PPG
2024-25: 0.33 PPG

We know what this player is, he's a bust, move on and just be glad Laf rebounded and is going to cover the bet. Not every team hits on their picks and the mighty Rangers are no different.

Okay then, no thanks. We’ll stick to our valuation. We don’t need to sell him to your team.

 

[bernmeister]

Liljegren for Kakko?

again, no, we are not dealing him and certainly not for cheap

 

[VeteranPresence]

Okay then, no thanks. We’ll stick to our valuation. We don’t need to sell him to your team.

My team doesn't need a perennial sub-30 point forward for a 2nd round pick. No teams do, come to think of it...

 

[Voodoo Glow Skulls]

Veleno for Kakko