bernmeister
Registered User
I will after you answer this ?:Can you estimate what decade will be his coming out party?
does R mgmt bend, buckle and break and listen to me,
or
do we have to rely on their continued nonsense?
I will after you answer this ?:Can you estimate what decade will be his coming out party?
Your ideas have always seemed out there to me, I do not watch the Rangers enough to have an opinion on any secondary players. Some front offices put everything together, yours missed on Kakko and LaFreniere(neither of which you can pin on management) probably costing you a Cup. The last time I was a Ranger fan was when the GAG Line was together.I will after you answer this ?:
does R mgmt bend, buckle and break and listen to me,
or
do we have to rely on their continued nonsense?
His career average is 24 and he’s pacing for less than that this season.Will Zegras crack 10? Outlier years happen both good and bad.
Mm? He's been constantly fine. Despite low offensive production the team performs well with him on the ice, a decent middle-six player with upside.Kakko isn't worth the paper his contract is printed on. He's never once showed any life.
Wasn't he supposed to be the next Barkov? I said Puljujarvi 2.0 and was mocked. A can't miss prospect, I was told.
Mm? He's been constantly fine. Despite low offensive production the team performs well with him on the ice, a decent middle-six player with upside.
You're grasping for straws if you think Kakko has upside at 24. He's Puljujarvi all over again and even he showed more scoring touch.
BingoKakko will be a very serviceable 2nd/3rd line tweener with 30-40 point abilities.
I'm 1000% comfortable keeping him in NY
This is just flat out wrong. Kakko plays a man’s game. Will give you 30-45 pts a year depending on deployment PK/PP neither which he gets a chance to do in NY.You're grasping for straws if you think Kakko has upside at 24. He's Puljujarvi all over again and even he showed more scoring touch.
This. Yes, he hasn't panned out considering his draft position and pedigree after breaking records in Finland. But let's put draft position aside at this point because he likely never justifies the draft position.Kakko will be a very serviceable 2nd/3rd line tweener with 30-40 point abilities.
I'm 1000% comfortable keeping him in NY
Probably Nic Dowd
W/re-emergence of new 'kid' line, and KK looking GOOD, he is less available than ever.Should Columbus give him a look? They have the worst of luck and probably could try him in the top two lines with little to lose.
Why would artemi waiveW/re-emergence of new 'kid' line, and KK looking GOOD, he is less available than ever.
Remember, Panarin is not gonna sniff anywhere near the 11.6+ he is now getting. What offer, if any, would be insulting. To avoid ugly scene, while not immediately now, before his deal finishes end of next season, he will waive. Rs will deal, get something, not nothing.
Selling KK given that reality is stupid
I don't think so, even the Finns called him a "weaker" prospect.Wasn't he supposed to be the next Barkov? I said Puljujarvi 2.0 and was mocked. A can't miss prospect, I was told.
Rangers are in win now mode and you don't deal players like Panarin off as a rental in win now mode. He's better than any rental player they would be able to get. Panarin won't waive because they aren't going to ask him to.W/re-emergence of new 'kid' line, and KK looking GOOD, he is less available than ever.
Remember, Panarin is not gonna sniff anywhere near the 11.6+ he is now getting. What offer, if any, would be insulting. To avoid ugly scene, while not immediately now, before his deal finishes end of next season, he will waive. Rs will deal, get something, not nothing.
Selling KK given that reality is stupid
pls read fullyWhy would artemi waive
this bold is the fallacy peeps need to recognize and admit bern is rightRangers are in win now mode and you don't deal players like Panarin off as a rental in win now mode. He's better than any rental player they would be able to get. Panarin won't waive because they aren't going to ask him to.
this bold is the fallacy peeps need to recognize and admit bern is right
usually
depending on the return
dealing star vets for quality youth IS BETTER
because IT EXTENDS THE WINDOW
going other way as you suggest = shorter window,
and either
you don't extend bread and get nothing
or you capitulate and give star entering early 30s long term deal past mid 30s = eventual prob
NO NO NO NO
Deal bread now, get max return, areas of need
hi end young Ds