bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 9,255
- 9,715
See and I dont think automatically producing = playing well.I'm not arguing that they weren't stale to start.... but when they play well they should be rewarded. When they are producing, they should be left alone. Both players were moved after starting to find their groove.. most notably Kakko with Panarin and Laffy was replace by Reaves in Minnesota.
It's bizzaro moves like that, that bother me. Laffy should have been getting 17-18 minutes a game in the playoffs. He was easily our best 5v5 player IMO
There's no risk in giving him a 2-3 year deal.
There is a risk in giving him a 1 year deal.
That is the difference. A lot of people here equate the fantasy stat view to playing well. Players can play well and not produce, and they can play like trash and produce points (panarin in the playoffs).
For all the praise heaped at kakko for his defensive game I dont even think he has been consistently good there primarily bc he lacks that extra effort most nhl players have to provide and he isn't good enough to skip by right now on talent. I say again, when he is beaten one on one he often hesitates with a sulk of sorts before he attempts to reengage the play and that second or two that he lets go by allows the other player to leave with the puck or move it along. that is the part of 1 on 1 battle that he struggles with and it has more to do with instinctual attitude and work ethic than it does skill. laf did that at times in the year and he was adjusted accordingly. These are the differences of top prospects in an org trying to make the playoffs and make a run vs them playing in NJ or ARZ. Personally I have no issue with expectations...