His anger told me that Kakko did something to infuriate Gallant. Never saw him like that the entire season.
Wondering how you know what Gallant told his players.
Am I reading this correctly? You're angry Reaves was scratched?
He was arguably their worst forward of the entire playoffs.
Ummm, what? Never said I knew what Gallant told the players. Is that what you got from my comment? lol
What anger? I saw a quick dismissal of a reaction when asked by the press about the roster moves which is not a good look for him or the team. You can debate that if you wish.
No, I don't think you're reading correctly.
Angry Reaves was scratched... a little. Kind of, yeah angry and disappointed (which comes with the gig as a Ranger fan) that both Kakko and Reaves were scratched for a borderline AHL player and a vet that had no business being on the ice and who coincidentally barely played in a game that was do or die situation.
Was that roster move really the best shot of icing the best roster? Think really hard whether or not its a good look for the coach or team to make that kind of move then not answer the press as to why it was made. Think but don't think too hard because it's not a good look at all.
This is the part where you sell me on Kakko and Reaves not being the difference in a win or loss. Can't answer that but you'd be in the minority to think if Hunt and Strome over Kakko and Reaves gives you a better chance.