Let's refer back to this Vince article
Rangers practice observations: Righty-heavy power play keeps producing and extrapolate it to the even strength play.
1) The guys on PP1 say they don't have set plays and rely on improvisation
2) It took a couple of years for these guys to get comfortable with each other
3) Panarin is an improvisational player in all situations, including even strength. Meanwhile, Strome heavily adapts his game to serve Panarin. While that's less of a situation for Zib and Kreider, they have their own issues 5v5. Kreider does not play heavy on the walls. Zib has evolved into more of a rush player.
Kakko and Laf likely have played in structured hockey for most of their lives. Kakko plays the cycle game. Laf is described as an elite grinder. Both of them are not conducive to flying up and down the ice all game on rush plays. They have to contend with different play styles of those vets. If it took the vets a couple years to get familiar with each other, then it's going to take Kakko and Laf maybe even longer. Or never. It's trying to mix oil with water.
Philosophically, do we want Kakko and Laf to become finesse rush players who make their living on transition play? That's not what they set out to be when they were picked by the team.
People said Chytil was dumb last night. After an atrocious first few minutes, I thought he did what he had to do playing with Panarin and Strome. Chytil can't even take of himself away from the puck as a centerman; now you think he can chase Panarin and Strome all night trying to guess what they want to do? Chytil played along the walls, drove straight up and down, went to the net, which is what Kakko did to be somewhat successful while he was on their line. Which is not unlike what Blackwell did to moderate success. Chytil even gave them a few great outlet passes on the rush.