Yip, theres always some kind of shattenkirk, dan boyle, etc etc in the way.A hard cap and constantly recovering from old mistakes.
We couldn’t give Mika 8 years because we only had room for 6m, we had to buy out shattenkirk because hank wouldn’t retire or accept a trade.
It’s the cab getting kicked over and over.
Also Kakko, Laf and miller should all be signing 3-4 year deals not 8, because they haven’t actually proved anything and it’s in their best interest to sign a bridge. It also makes the 3rd contract far better because it takes them through their prime and they could get one more big deal.
We were speaking about NHL head coaches (Gallant) not a goalie coach. NHL level head coaches are more about teaching X's and O's expectations than individual players skills. They can help with a skill occasionally but their contribution is minimal. They are not going to be teaching skating, shooting, etc at the NHL level in a significant way. Improvements will have to come from players themselves at this level or with other types of coaches like a strength, shooting or power skating instructor in the off season. Occasionally a head coach or an assistant will help with something skill wise but the overwhelming majority of improvement will come from the player themselves. Years ago in the AHL I watched Jamie Lundmark stay 45 minutes after practice working on his 1 timers. It did not work out for Jamie but that is the type of example I'm speaking about. Often young guys build their skills and confidence in their offseasons not during the season.You really don't think NHL coaches help their players develop at all?
for every ufa year a player's aav goes up. We were 100% cap strapped when mika extended, and it was lucky we got him at 5.5 x 5... Mika could've bridged the whole way and we'd have been screwed.Yip, theres always some kind of shattenkirk, dan boyle, etc etc in the way.
6 or 7 instead of 8 was very viable imo. Get a potential huge bargain on a 60+ pt player or two making around 5m in 2025 -27 yknow? Ufa years
Of course there's no guarantee the players would take the deal and their growth could stagnate but the same sort of risk comes with older players. Stagnation and decline.
No player signed at age 28 or 29 has proven they can do anything at age 31-36
X's and O's can still make or break a player's development. Most of the guys in the NHL have a lot of similar physical attributes to be honest. It's the ability to see the game for the X's and O's that separates a lot of the elite.We were speaking about NHL head coaches (Gallant) not a goalie coach. NHL level head coaches are more about teaching X's and O's expectations than individual players skills. They can help with a skill occasionally but their contribution is minimal. They are not going to be teaching skating, shooting, etc at the NHL level in a significant way. Improvements will have to come from players themselves at this level or with other types of coaches like a strength, shooting or power skating instructor in the off season. Occasionally a head coach or an assistant will help with something skill wise but the overwhelming majority of improvement will come from the player themselves. Years ago in the AHL I watched Jamie Lundmark stay 45 minutes after practice working on his 1 timers. It did not work out for Jamie but that is the type of example I'm speaking about. Often young guys build their skills and confidence in their offseasons not during the season.
Exactly. We were cap strapped bc we have near zero foresight which is what my og post said.for every ufa year a player's aav goes up. We were 100% cap strapped when mika extended, and it was lucky we got him at 5.5 x 5... Mika could've bridged the whole way and we'd have been screwed.
its not zero foresight. Its that we were essentially paying for our cup run. and we didn't have any space.Exactly. We were cap strapped bc we have near zero foresight which is what my og post said.
The point I made was partly that Ufa years drive the price up. That's why I mentioned getting them at a bargain in the hypothetical where we lock some young guns up, bc normally those years would cost 6-9 million depending on if the players develop into 60+ point guys.
If we had the foresight to lock guys in for 6+ years then we'd pay more on rfa years to have a potential huge bargain on the ufa years
I didn't say it's zero foresight. I said it's near zero foresight, specifically bc it really wasn't JUST for our cup run. It was for our dumb fascination with aged names and players who don't even fit the system. It's happened before during and after our cup runs. And more often than not it's blown up in our faceits not zero foresight. Its that we were essentially paying for our cup run. and we didn't have any space.
No contending team is going to have the cap room to keep all its players AND sign its kids to team friendly deals early. None. Kids who perform well enough to get long term deals, get 8 year deals at big money. Kids who don't get bridged. Mackinnon is the exception that proves the rule not the ideal.
The rangers would absolutely love to sign laf to an 8 year 5.5m deal. Laf won't sign that. He might sign an 8x8 like hughes, but that puts us in cap hell again, and we likely lose miller and chytil.
This constant complaints about the rangers cap management ignores the fact that success means bigger contracts.
for one preseason game, at least lolWith all of the other roster decisions going on with this team going into opening night, it’s kinda nice that Kakko has quietly reasserted himself and is set for first line duties, deservedly.
Kreider invited him to his group hug with Mika after Mika scored last game. That's the Rangers equivalent of being "made".for one preseason game, at least lol
Kreider invited him to his group hug with Mika after Mika scored last game. That's the Rangers equivalent of being "made".
Panarin setting up Kravtsov for one timers after every practice is the Rangers equivalent of having to go to summer school.
By the time this season is over Panarin is going to be asking Kakko to take him under his wing and give him some tips. Maybe shoot some one timers after practice if Kakko's not busy.
You wanted to trade him for a Kane rental.I’ve been real hard on the kid, but he really looks like he’s ready to become a player for us. As long as he stays healthy and keepe shooting the puck
You wanted to trade him for a Kane rental.
Kakko is treated here like Daniel Jones gets treated by Giants "fans". Lots of things around them have hurt their development. But they can't see past it. It will always be their fault. As a fan of both, i'm looking forward to a year of their redemption.Always remember, Larry brooks and plenty of others here proposed that.
F*cking yikes.
Always remember, Larry brooks and plenty of others here proposed that.
F*cking yikes.
It’s like a third of the board. The win now crowd has no patience and no foresight.
These are the same people who campaigned against trading DeAngelo when we had Fox and Trouba. Before his incident. When he was coming off like a 60 point season.