Fowler is not perfect. Neither is JVR. The OP didn't ask for trade proposals. He asked for value. Fowler straight up would be full value for JVR.
Which means Toronto declines which means you are wrong. The guy asked what the value for JVR is. It is simple. They need a young 1st line winger to play with Matthews. You know like JVR. The only piece that is fair for them is a 1RHD. Meaning depending on the player offered it will be the 1RHD+ for JVR or JVR+ for 1RHD. Or a 1 for 1.
Value is variable. You can always break down any player to picks if you want but that value is dependant on who is paying and who is getting and what they want. Doesn't mean picks are what is best. I mean how many firsts is McDavid worth? 4? 5? 10? Pick an amount that is fair then add one. Should Edmonton trade McDavid for those picks? Not likely. Same with JVR. You can spout any package of 1st+blah blah blah or say he is worth a Fowler or Eberle it doesn't mean that is what he gets.
The point of this is to find a fair offer from Anaheim. Don't believe me? Check the poster's stupid offer of Despres+ in another thread.
The short answer. There isn't one from Anaheim. We don't need Fowler (meaning you have to sweeten with overpayment pieces so we can flip THOSE pieces for a replacement JVR resulting in a net gain, which is stupid) and you won't move Vatanen for the RHD we need. And of course won't trade better players than JVR like Getzlaf, Perry, or Lindholm so Anaheim won't work.
Last point. Stop offering Toronto fans a package for JVR. We have 8 defensemen and like 15 potential forwards (obviously not all will make the team) and more bottom line depth is not wanted.
I hope that helped. And if you still don't get it then ask yourself. What would be a fair package for Perry? If you are not willing to take a package of 2-3 players and 2nd round picks that are not potential top line players then stop offering the same for JVR.