TommyDangles
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2021
- 959
- 1,052
And then be looking for a goalie while going through Askarov's growing pains?
Some people in this thread have absolutely 0 clue how to develop a goalie
That ain't it chief. You don't wanna throw your young goalie to the wolvesOr the idea that Nashville gets better up front and scores goals for their young goalie as opposed to trying to win like 90's hockey. Expecting Brunette to churn out 70+ point seasons out of Gustav Nyquist is borderline dumb
That ain't it chief. You don't wanna throw your young goalie to the wolves
2-3 years is the sweet spot with where Askarov is at.3 years was a guesstimate. Whatever the NMC years are, move him after. Askarov is still hella young
I mean they just saw what top goaltenders fetched on the market. Markström with two years left, retained, basically nothing. Ullmark, arguably Boston took the worst of it. Saros is better than both of them, but I think this pretty much showed that there was no premiur return available.
You don't have a clue, this ain't going anywhereNo response to the actual roster management but just how goalies should be developed, lmaoooo
Finally someone who gets it.2-3 years is the sweet spot with where Askarov is at.
He'll most likely earn the backup spot at some point next season, and then another year or two to take over as a starter if he develops as expected. That leaves the Preds in a really awkward spot if Saros has a 4-5+ year NMC, where Askarov is too good to be a backup and potentially trying to force his way out.
Askarov put up a .882 in the AHL playoffs this season. He has put up a .911 with no progression in the AHL. I wouldn't be counting chickens just yet. I'm not with Wolf and he's utterly dominated the AHL.Having a backup goalie in 3 years making 7.74M will definitely be something.
Right where the Preds want to be. A backup goalie making 7.74M for 5+ more years.You don't have a clue, this ain't going anywhere
Finally someone who gets it.
If Askarov forces their hand in 3ish years, that's right where the Preds wanna be
Hell look at Knight. Took over the NHL net in the playoffs right outta college, a year later he's back in the minors.Askarov put up a .882 in the AHL playoffs this season. He has put up a .911 with no progression in the AHL. I wouldn't be counting chickens just yet. I'm not with Wolf and he's utterly dominated the AHL.
Almost like they can trade himRight where the Preds want to be. A backup goalie making 7.74M for 5+ more years.
Right where the Preds want to be. A backup goalie making 7.74M for 5+ more years.
You don't have a clue, this ain't going anywhere
Finally someone who gets it.
If Askarov forces their hand in 3ish years, that's right where the Preds wanna be
Ugh you might want to check out Askarov more, he had a whole month where he gave up like four goals.Askarov put up a .882 in the AHL playoffs this season. He has put up a .911 with no progression in the AHL. I wouldn't be counting chickens just yet. I'm not with Wolf and he's utterly dominated the AHL.
And why is Saros a backup all of a sudden? He's 29.Right where the Preds want to be. A backup goalie making 7.74M for 5+ more years.
Trade Askarov?Almost like they can trade him
I've checked out Askarov. He had a couple of good months and a couple of putrid months. Like a lot of developing young players. He hasn't even proven to be an elite goalie in the AHL.Ugh you might want to check out Askarov more, he had a whole month where he gave up like four goals.
And why is Saros a backup all of a sudden? He's 29.
Almost like they can trade him
I remember when people said the same thing when we signed Markstrom.Trade Askarov?
Nobody is taking a 33 year old backup goalie making 7.74M signed for another 5 years. Unless Saros is LTIRetired at that point
Do tell, what high level forward was Saros bringing back? Ullmark just won a vezina and was essentially traded for nothing (the cap dump and the 1st basically cancel out). Fleury won a vezina and was traded for nothing. Markstrom was traded with retention for a late 1st.The difference between the Preds being relevant or not within the next 3 years doesn't matter if Saros is or isn't on the roster. You're completing missing the point that he can still bring back a high level forward that team needs. No argument to how barren their top 6 was last year and they had the remains of ROR, Gustav Nyquist there but yeah that's a sustainable roster if you have Saros according to you.