zeke
The Dube Abides
- Mar 14, 2005
- 66,937
- 36,957
Why is that worse than taking the word of a public site stat run by people you also don't know?
Because the public stats explain how they do the calculations and are frequently tested by everyone trying to figure out which are the most reliable and predictive, and I can look at their years od data and test it and compare myself in any way I can think of.
Whereas this guys is just saying a random number that I have no idea what it is or what it means.
Surely you see the difference?