kyne
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2007
- 672
- 412
It's what I was thinking. I think Mailloux is better known quantity at this point.He should be the one getting a second look tonight, not Logan Mailloux.
It's what I was thinking. I think Mailloux is better known quantity at this point.He should be the one getting a second look tonight, not Logan Mailloux.
It's what I was thinking. I think Mailloux is better known quantity at this point.
Mailloux need to be better then Barron to win a spot what he wasn’t yesterdayHe should be the one getting a second look tonight, not Logan Mailloux.
Probably better Reinbacher and Mailloux getting ice time in Laval then. Barron, Guhle, Savard on right D. At least until a injury.He did , the kid was solid and looked very confident on the defensive side of the puck . Early days I know but I saw encouraging signs in his game last night .
How much does playing on a back to back effect dmen?Mailloux need to be better then Barron to win a spot what he wasn’t yesterday
I think Barron is, already what we hope to get from DR and LM.How much does playing on a back to back effect dmen?
Not that I'm going to make any kind of judgement based on the first two preseason games. I'll be more interested to see how they look in the last few preseason games and when there are less AHL players in the lineups.
I disagree. For age and contract reasons, Barron will stay, but DR is already as good as Barron is defensively and has barely played in NA at this point. We can hope for DR to become a lot more than what Barron is.I think Barron is, already what we hope to get from DR and LM.
48 games last year, and he produced some decent numbers for a Dman, and helps jumping in with the offense. His D is where he needs to focus, and so do the other 4 guys on the ice at that time.....
I think our future in DR and LM need a little more AHL time yet. Barron should stay at this point, and then as the year progresses, we have to figure out is is Savard going? Barron going??
How much does playing on a back to back effect dmen?
Not that I'm going to make any kind of judgement based on the first two preseason games. I'll be more interested to see how they look in the last few preseason games and when there are less AHL players in the lineups.
Both of those kids have more upside yes absolutely but neither are where Barron already isI disagree. For age and contract reasons, Barron will stay, but DR is already as good as Barron is defensively and has barely played in NA at this point. We can hope for DR to become a lot more than what Barron is.
Same for Mailloux. Him and Barron have very similar tools, and both have questionable toolboxes at this point, but he LM's potential is definitely a lot higher than what JB is today. No question. Just like JB's potential is much higher than what he is today. (Not that I'm confident he'll reach it).
Based on the very limited sample size, I believe Reinbacher was more solid than Barron, and Barron better than Mailloux, who was even with Engstrom. Oeville has been the best at breaking up plays and sending the team back up ice with possession.Both of those kids have more upside yes absolutely but neither are where Barron already is
Agree to disagree
Like I said it's early days , I don't want to draw conclusions based upon one pre season game .Probably better Reinbacher and Mailloux getting ice time in Laval then. Barron, Guhle, Savard on right D. At least until a injury.
Matheson, Hutson, Wifi on left D. Struble the 7th guy.
I'd give Barron plenty ice time this season. There's signs there. We paid high price for him. I want to give him every opportunity
I sure as hell don't think he is defensively what we hope to get from DR and LM.I think Barron is, already what we hope to get from DR and LM.
48 games last year, and he produced some decent numbers for a Dman, and helps jumping in with the offense. His D is where he needs to focus, and so do the other 4 guys on the ice at that time.....
I think our future in DR and LM need a little more AHL time yet. Barron should stay at this point, and then as the year progresses, we have to figure out is is Savard going? Barron going??
Barron just has to continue what he's been doing moving the puck quickly using his frame to snuff out plays.
I like when he controls his space like the hit he used on the PK to deny zone entry a solid crunching in control hit.
With his mobility and size he needs to do more of that.
He's boxed out well he's engaged well and he joins the rush very well.
He needs to work on his one timer.
Whiffs like we saw will automatically lead to "Barron's terrible" comments despite playing a decent game up to that point.
Still needs to work on his pinch he thinks he can win everything with his size and mobility but this isn't junior hockey.
The one chance his pairing gave up when we pulled the goaltender was actually Hutson's mistake.
Lane can't give him that puck when he has two players on him and no room to maneuver.
I like what I'm seeing so far in camp.
His errors in Camp haven't been missed assignments and ever since he started moving the puck quicker in Laval he isn't turning it over nearly as often.In the past the problems I've had with him are exclusively in the defensive end: missed coverage, coughing the puck up, etc... if he can somehow fix those, he'll be a quality NHL dman.
I'd give Barron plenty ice time this season. There's signs there. We paid high price for him. I want to give him every opportunity
That Hage doesn't happen without that second has been pointed out and It's not like Barron wasn't a touted player with his natural attributes.The Habs didn't really pay a high price for Barron, IMO. They had to get rid of Lehkonen for salary cap reasons, as he was one of the few forwards who was worth something and didn't fit into the long range rebuild. They got Barron and a 2nd round pick in the trade. That's pretty good value, considering Barron was a young, former late 1st round pick.