No, not to many observers, and not to Martin St. Louis. The very first time MSL put him with Suzuki and Caufield, the coach said the kid "earned it".Year 2 started out like WTF, why us again drafting another bust.... To the past 2 months WOW, finally a big strong skilled player that is playing a decent 200 foot game. I'm very happy and exited for the following years!!!
It occured to me too, never liked his interviews much - always seemed fake. But I was still stuck in the we need a 1C and this guy was "supposed" to be the next Tavares... Wright may turn out to have a decent career, but I would feel sick seeing Slaf on the Devils (which is where hed be) right now. we haven't had such a specimen since Big John Leclair and boy he was fun to watch.No shame in preferring Nemec and Wright, i did too, there's no way for us to know Wright is a complete nutsack (I think) without interviews and what not, I did raise the possibility in January 2022 but evidently, cannot go against talent.
Slaf might finish with about as many goals this year at 19/20 as Leclair had at his peak with us at ages 23/24 and 24/25.It occured to me too, never liked his interviews much - always seemed fake. But I was still stuck in the we need a 1C and this guy was "supposed" to be the next Tavares... Wright may turn out to have a decent career, but I would feel sick seeing Slaf on the Devils (which is where hed be) right now. we haven't had such a specimen since Big John Leclair and boy he was fun to watch.
He had a bad shooting percentage, now he’s back up at a nice high normal of 12.7%. He can’t realistically shoot better. He can only shoot at a higher volume to improve.No shame in preferring Nemec and Wright, i did too, there's no way for us to know Wright is a complete nutsack (I think) without interviews and what not, I did raise the possibility in January 2022 but evidently, cannot go against talent. It is still very much in the air on who's going to be better out of the 10ish top players in 2022. Funny thing though is I thought Slaf had the highest ceiling, not so sure this is true anymore, but I do think he had the highest floor all along.
People need to chill tho, he's shooting at 23% since mid december, that's gonna go down quick.
Sometimes reminds me of Barkov oddly
Yeah i can see a 90 point player here in his prime. He scores goalscorer goals already and his passing is near-elite, he just needs to put a full season of consistency together and he's gonna be a monster.
Yes, he's back to a normal now, maybe slightly high, but people who look at "x number of games" or "last X games" are using statistics erroneously.He had a bad shooting percentage, now he’s back up at a nice high normal of 12.7%. He can’t realistically shoot better. He can only shoot at a higher volume to improve.
That’s why we need to be careful to assume 60+ points. He has a tendency to fall back on his pattern of being overgenerous with the puck. He did at least twice last game. If he never breaks out of that cycle, he won’t get those extra goals nor the extra assists on rebounds. Dr. Shot needs to drill that math in his head.Yes, he's back to a normal now, maybe slightly high, but people who look at "x number of games" or "last X games" are using statistics erroneously.
He continues to improve by leaps and bounds. I don’t think 60 points is an unrealistic expectation for next year. Obviously it depends on health and usage but he’s been really good. He’s been our best player on a lot of nights lately. Really impressive.That’s why we need to be careful to assume 60+ points. He has a tendency to fall back on his pattern of being overgenerous with the puck. He did at least twice last game. If he never breaks out of that cycle, he won’t get those extra goals nor the extra assists on rebounds. Dr. Shot needs to drill that math in his head.
Yes he’s improving by leaps and bounds. His shot looks much more dangerous. But to be fair to ourselves there’s still room for improvement.He continues to improve by leaps and bounds. I don’t think 60 points is an unrealistic expectation for next year. Obviously it depends on health and usage but he’s been really good. He’s been our best player on a lot of nights lately. Really impressive.
I’m predicting 60 points, not 100. Absolutely he has more to work on.Yes he’s improving by leaps and bounds. His shot looks much more dangerous. But to be fair to ourselves there’s still room for improvement.
Case in point, he wasted a prime scoring chance on a rush by passing the puck through a D to Matheson who was in the goalie’s face with no angle. Typical NHLers will shoot and either score or create a dangerous rebound, Slaf ALWAYS passes.
I’ve edited some of his pre-NHL videos and watched everything I could find on him pre-NHL. I’ve seen him miss on that play so many times, it’s crazy. He has 0% video career success rate on that play. Yet keeps trying and trying. Perhaps he thinks by failing enough, it’ll work one day.
Some people may not realize it.I'm waiting for the blow up, in terms of a 3 goal 2 assist game....where it becomes completely irrefutable.
I bet some would have voted for CHL if it was an option.Always remember....
44 of us said he should be in Europe this year.
This will come with repetition. He’s either not seeing certain shooting lanes yet or not confident in his ability to get the puck threw which is very common for any young player as they don’t want a bad shot to result in a turnover. 20 games ago he wasn’t shooting in clear shooting positions. He’s progressed a lot in that area. Far from perfect but the more he scores and gets that confidence, the more the puck will start going in. I’m a little surprised just how good his shot is when he uses it.Yes he’s improving by leaps and bounds. His shot looks much more dangerous. But to be fair to ourselves there’s still room for improvement.
Case in point, he wasted a prime scoring chance on a rush by passing the puck through a D to Matheson who was in the goalie’s face with no angle. Typical NHLers will shoot and either score or create a dangerous rebound, Slaf ALWAYS passes.
I’ve edited some of his pre-NHL videos and watched everything I could find on him pre-NHL. I’ve seen him miss on that exact play so many times it’s crazy. He has 0% video career success rate on that play. Yet keeps trying and trying. Perhaps he thinks by failing enough, it’ll work one day.
You mean a 19 year old isn't a finished product?Yes he’s improving by leaps and bounds. His shot looks much more dangerous. But to be fair to ourselves there’s still room for improvement.
Case in point, he wasted a prime scoring chance on a rush by passing the puck through a D to Matheson who was in the goalie’s face with no angle. Typical NHLers will shoot and either score or create a dangerous rebound, Slaf ALWAYS passes.
I’ve edited some of his pre-NHL videos and watched everything I could find on him pre-NHL. I’ve seen him miss on that exact play so many times it’s crazy. He has 0% video career success rate on that play. Yet keeps trying and trying. Perhaps he thinks by failing enough, it’ll work one day.
That's just confidence. Will come with experience. People forget that Suzuki and Caufield were still in the OHL and NCAA at this age.That’s why we need to be careful to assume 60+ points. He has a tendency to fall back on his pattern of being overgenerous with the puck. He did at least twice last game. If he never breaks out of that cycle, he won’t get those extra goals nor the extra assists on rebounds. Dr. Shot needs to drill that math in his head.