River Meadow
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2016
- 7,004
- 9,390
The kid is 19. And was playing in the NHL and scoring when he was 18. Anyone who was writing this kid off was expressing unreasonable impatience.
"Scoring"
The kid is 19. And was playing in the NHL and scoring when he was 18. Anyone who was writing this kid off was expressing unreasonable impatience.
He scored more goals and points than the rest of his draft class combined. But for his string of injuries he would have scored more.
It’s a difference of opinion. And honestly, there was good reason before to think he should be in the minors. Now? Not so much.It’s impatience.
He scored more goals and points than the rest of his drafr class combined. But for his string of injuries would have scored more.
It’s a difference of opinion. And honestly, there was good reason before to think he should be in the minors. Now? Not so much.
And it especially doesn’t make sense to do it now that he’s playing the best hockey of his young career.
If he can put up 0.5ppg for the remainder of the season (~60 games), that would bring his point total to a very healthy ~35 points, which I think anyone here would have happily taken before the season.By manipulating statistics, Slafkovsky now has 1 point in his first 10 games, and 5 in his last 10 game. For the fortune tellers who know how to predict the future of young players with tiny samples, which ten game sample should we use?
Nope.Completely disagree.
Personally I think last year he shouldn’t have been in the NHL. And he got off to a bad start this year.
A big part of that is usage but posters can only go based on what they see. It’s really only since being moved up that I’ve felt he looks like he really belongs here.
So, no I don’t think it was silly of posters to think that at all. You can only go with what you’ve seen. Personally I think it would be a real mistake to move a player down when he’s playing his best hockey. Glad we’ve moved him up and hope he stays here. But I don’t think posters were crazy for thinking he should start in the AHL. It made good sense to argue that way, esp with Dach going down and Slaf struggling early on.
The poll is pretty direct.There’s probably very little posters that believe he can’t play in the NHL under any capacity. The debate usually centres on if his offensive game will progress more in a slower or faster game.
Well said. I was happy when he had his hot streak with Monahan last year and I’m happy to have seen him play well-enough last night. It’s good to see growth even if it is incremental.This.
We're all happy he's playing better. It's what we all wanted to see.
It's odd to make the insinuation that some are, to say he's been playing well all along, and we just didn't see it. No, he's had some baaaaaaad games...
35pts would be great given his dry start. I think it’s more fair to expect 30ish.If he can put up 0.5ppg for the remainder of the season (~60 games), that would bring his point total to a very healthy ~35 points, which I think anyone here would have happily taken before the season.
Goalpost movingNope.
The belief that Slaf should spend the whole season out of the NHL was a bad take at/after camp & preseason, and completely ridiculous now.
Bad takes are bade takes.
Look at Jack Hughes stat line after the same amount of games and it’s pretty close.
It was too soon to call Slafkovsky a bust after 40 weak games. It's too soon to say he's 'carrying the mail' (that's a good thing, right?) after ~12 strong games.So are we finally liking Bobrov a bit more?
Because it rapidly looks like it would have been a catastrophe to miss on Slaf.
Apart from.secondary pp assist, Cooley is not even close to have his overall twoway and physical impact.
The rest are AHLers.
He is carrying the mail.
You don’t know my family.Those that wanted him in the AHL can never be wrong and never be right. That hypothesis will never be tested and forever will be an unknown.
We should really just move on from the argument. He belongs in the NHL. He is never going down. Let's just enjoy his progression....together...like family.
So how is it that more scouts had Slaf as first overall than any other player?It's because he looked terrible with no real redeeming qualities or outstanding skills except for some decent passes few and far between, as well as his HYOOGE size.
I would lean SLIGHTLY to the recent ten games. Something like expecting 0.35 points per game for the next 20 games, and maybe 0.375 ppg the final 40 games. Finish with 28 points or so.By manipulating statistics, Slafkovsky now has 1 point in his first 10 games, and 5 in his last 10 game. For the fortune tellers who know how to predict the future of young players with tiny samples, which ten game sample should we use?
I remember listening to Aaron Ward on Tsn Radio last year. He was saying that it took him half a season getting confortable on the Europe bigger ice when he went there during NHL strike. He was a 10yrs Nhl vet going to a weaker league, can you imagine how hard the transition is for an 18yrs old kid going to a wayy better and faster league on a smaller rink!!You can see the game is slowing down for him and he's being proactive instead of reactive, his board play has come a long way too.
Progress
I actually think he always knew he was big, he got suspended last year for it basically. His size/speed combo was dangerous with his poor awareness/game going too fast for him so I think he was holding back.It took Dach until last year to realize “holy shit I’m big” when I think Gudas went to hit him and Gudas fell. Then it just clicked and he started playing like a force.
Not sure what moment happened to Slaf recently, but it’s like he’s finally starting to realize exactly how big he is. I can’t wait to see him at 22-23 years old when he’s fully coordinated and filled out.
He’s already made moves that MB wasn’t capable of doing over a decade. I don’t think MSL is a great coach, but for the youth on this team he’s a good fit. Michel Therrien was who MB brought in at first chance.That’s perfectly fine to say and think but it can’t be that Hughes is better than Bergevin but also we cannot criticize Hughes for any decision because it is too early. If it is too early to criticize Hughes’ decisions or pass a judgement on his work thus far then it is also too early to say he’s better than anybody.
I don't think I'll ever like bobrov after watching that pre draft video, not even if slaf turns into jagr 2.0So are we finally liking Bobrov a bit more?
Because it rapidly looks like it would have been a catastrophe to miss on Slaf.
Apart from.secondary pp assist, Cooley is not even close to have his overall twoway and physical impact.
The rest are AHLers.
He is carrying the mail.
I'll not "never" like Bobrov, but I'm not a fan. That's for sure.So are we finally liking Bobrov a bit more?
Because it rapidly looks like it would have been a catastrophe to miss on Slaf.
Apart from.secondary pp assist, Cooley is not even close to have his overall twoway and physical impact.
The rest are AHLers.
He is carrying the mail.
No way it's THAT badYou don’t know my family.
I'm sorry but of course you do. You check your stocks earnings report every Q earnings report to see if your narrative (for buying the stock) has changed. Sure, usually, like 90-99% off the time, you don't see anything major but those rare,few times you do see the writing on the wall that you need to GTFO or even possibly back up the truck and go all in.You don't evaluate the performance of a stock portfolio by isolating the performance of a specific stock in Q1.