Juraj Slafkovsky - Year Two

Where would you prefer Slaf spend his 23-24 season?


  • Total voters
    596
Status
Not open for further replies.

StCaufield

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
2,471
2,312
The issue is gally isn't an NHLer without Monahan. So what line combo do we use to both give ourselves a chance to offload guys like Pearson and gally and also develop guys like Slaf without blatantly tanking or letting people know poor play gets rewarded if you were drafted first?

I'm at the point where Slaf has to go to Laval. He is not an NHL player right now. Even just for a month or two.
I think Gally is a prototypical 4th liner and I agree Slaf needs the AHL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrb1p

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,274
11,774
I think Gally is a prototypical 4th liner and I agree Slaf needs the AHL
Playing with Monahan someone will look at him as a top 9 player. Nobody wants a fourth liner at 6.5 cap hit and 8-9 mil real dollars. Even when we watch him play he isn't creating stuff on his own, he's getting points off of the work Monahan or the D do. He'd still be at 0 points on the fourth line in my opinion. He certainly plugs well enough in that support role that he's ok on the third. Far too slow to move up.

I feel like getting out of gallys contract would be a godsend if Hughes can pull it off.
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,194
4,027
Since Liiga is not available in North America, I always feel like the scouting for this league is pretty flawed, and appears to mostly consist of box score watching, and international games. Hopefully, they didn't base their decision solely on international performances.

I would assume they have local amateur scouts ;) that being said, I am based in Europe and feel like scouting rankings in Liiga and SHL are usually puzzling. This is not only an Habs issue.
 

Licou

Registered User
Sep 10, 2007
3,628
3,014
Longuh
His scouting is deficient on the basis that Slaf isn’t producing at whatever clip you wanted him to 50 games into his nhl career?

They are supposed to be drafting based on character or whatever their justifications are... And then I look at Slaf, who has 0 motor and Mesar who does nothing for 90 percent of his shifts...

This may turn out okay, but it's not looking good.

And the 2023 pick is a whole other story... And I do like Reinbacher...
 

NORiculous

Registered User
Jan 13, 2006
5,389
2,371
Montreal
His scouting is deficient on the basis that Slaf isn’t producing at whatever clip you wanted him to 50 games into his nhl career?
Saying something is wrong with Slafkovsky doesn’t necessarily have to be related with his production… Look at the games...

Also, more and more hockey people are saying/wondering what the heck is Montreal doing with him. It doesn’t mean they are right but it is passed concerning.

Is the source of all this bad scouting? Who knows. But to dismiss the problem is wrong.

I hope that Slafkovsky has the brains to ask to be sent down. Pacioretty did it because he wanted to play more, why not Slafkovsky?

If I was his agent I would definitely have this conversation with him. It also makes a good story for everyone (no one looks bad).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Takeru

MilesNewton

Registered User
Jul 7, 2019
1,595
441
So would management be hesitant to send him down because that is a reflection on their drafting? Especially if the last 2 games were tough, I feel its all about timing and optics with this team
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
The problem with your analogy is simple.

Slaf =/= Tesla Motors

Tesla Motors stock were already high at that point and their historic rise was mostly constant. So far with Slaf, there's absolutely no rise.

There is a lot of similitude. The mob were calling Tesla stocks overvalued, on the verge of bankruptcy, incapable of delivering their command, there was doubt over their factory, etc. In a similar fashion that everyone is now denying Slaf talent, no IQ, no understanding of the game, close of being a bust.

Short float was at an all time high. Like everyone and his mother is now down on Slaf.

Technically speaking, the stock was not in all time high. It was on a basing stage called Weinstein Phase 1(accumulation phase where selling pressure is suddenly meet and sustained by buyers, but the general feeling over the stock is usually very grim.) It took one good Earnings reports to take the stock into stage 2(uptrend stage) and eventually to a massive rise.

One could say Slaf is kinda in a stage 1 in his development whereas some players like Cooley or Mintyukov have already broke out into stage 2.

Obviously, there is a lot of discrepancy between a stock and a hockey player.

But just like the mob were only focusing on the problems and short term, repairable issue. They were blind to the absolute potential and upside in the company.

Its similar to Slaf in which now everyone is dismissing the upside and the skills. Everyone is focusing on short term issue.

Its possible Slaf bust. Its possible we are on the wrong track with him.

But its at your own peril to bet against this kind of potential at 19 years old. He might also just be one earnings report (a couple of goals) from breaking out. Young player performance can explode on a dime. Its witnessable everytime throughout the league. Like Tesla, and although it appears far and impossible right now, Slaf is one good stretch away from seeing his stock at all time high again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

admiralcadillac

Registered User
Oct 22, 2017
7,663
6,975
They are supposed to be drafting based on character or whatever their justifications are... And then I look at Slaf, who has 0 motor and Mesar who does nothing for 90 percent of his shifts...

This may turn out okay, but it's not looking good.

And the 2023 pick is a whole other story... And I do like Reinbacher...
Just because you say things doesn’t mean what you’re saying is accurate.
His scouting is deficient because he has a track record of sucking. Slaf isn’t his first pick.
And what does that have to do with Slaf?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,466
23,118
Edmonton
The next time you watch Slafkovsky play and think the AHL would be good for him, remember snake oil salesman Bobrov's rock-solid arguments and give your head a shake:

1: The hockey historians are paying attention. They know better than you.

2: What he's done on the big stage is unprecedented. A bit vague but it sure sounds impressive.

3: He has the ability to want to take the bulls by the horn. Bulls, plural. Watch out.

4. He wants to own the moment which is a personality trait, not just a hockey skill. Know the difference.

5. He's carrying the mail. How nice of him.

6. He has the pressure of a country on his shoulders and the proof is in the pudding that he kept getting better under that 5 million population. Inspiring.
How to get a job by looking and sounding like the part yet being a helpless moron 101

f*** Mackenzie’s list, the Habs have their own scouts who are paid to get it right. If we don’t need them and should be drafting based on Mackenzie’s list then let’s get rid of them then. They haven’t shown they have much to offer on their own.
Well how could the old boys club afford all those summer golf trips together if none of them are employed anymore?

Best not to rock the boat
 

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,466
23,118
Edmonton
Remove the Gauthier years (2) and the first 6 years of Bergevin's regime where it's now clear Timmins didn't have full control as the picks once TT became AGM were pretty good and Timmins ends-up with a very strong record compared to Bozobrov.
Stop it. "Remove the decade of terrible picks and Timmins was actually good"
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,117
12,199
Canada
Heading to Detroit Thursday. I hope Slaf is still on this team....I want to see the big boy live. Missed him last year because of his injury. I said it before. Give him a few games with Nick and Cole. We have nothing to lose. Put him on the PP1 over PowerDonkey who literally has the same bullshit production this year as Slaf.

If after a 3-5 or even 10 game stint, Slaf isn't scoring more points, send him down to get some confidence. I'm good with that now. I still think he is a unicorn. But it's a fine balance between exploding or imploding at this point. We should be treading very carefully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
36,183
34,327
Hockey Mecca
There is a lot of similitude. The mob were calling Tesla stocks overvalued, on the verge of bankruptcy, incapable of delivering their command, there was doubt over their factory, etc. In a similar fashion that everyone is now denying Slaf talent, no IQ, no understanding of the game, close of being a bust.

Short float was at an all time high. Like everyone and his mother is now down on Slaf.

Technically speaking, the stock was not in all time high. It was on a basing stage called Weinstein Phase 1(accumulation phase where selling pressure is suddenly meet and sustained by buyers, but the general feeling over the stock is usually very grim.) It took one good Earnings reports to take the stock into stage 2(uptrend stage) and eventually to a massive rise.

One could say Slaf is kinda in a stage 1 in his development whereas some players like Cooley or Mintyukov have already broke out into stage 2.

Obviously, there is a lot of discrepancy between a stock and a hockey player.

But just like the mob were only focusing on the problems and short term, repairable issue. They were blind to the absolute potential and upside in the company.

Its similar to Slaf in which now everyone is dismissing the upside and the skills. Everyone is focusing on short term issue.

Its possible Slaf bust. Its possible we are on the wrong track with him.

But its at your own peril to bet against this kind of potential at 19 years old. He might also just be one earnings report (a couple of goals) from breaking out. Young player performance can explode on a dime. Its witnessable everytime throughout the league. Like Tesla, and although it appears far and impossible right now, Slaf is one good stretch away from seeing his stock at all time high again.

Stop it, man. Tesla was being supplemented by carbon credits up the wazoo, it was just a matter of time before it picked up. Your analogy is fundamentally flawed as Tesla wasn't nearly at the same place as Slaf. Tesla had already conquered the stock market. Slaf hasn't conquered shit. A fundamental flaw that kills any other parallel you try to make between them.

Slaf is a lot more like Lion right now. Much much better analogy.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
It's these tantalizing highlights that keeps me going.

Well there is valid criticizing but there is also wrong and unfair criticizing.

That he is lost and treat the pucks like a hot potatos at times is one thing.

That he has no skills and no motor is another.

Its up to anyone who wants to bet against this type of upside while solely focusing on short term, surmontable issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee and waitin425

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,466
23,118
Edmonton
As bas as he looks, you bet against a 19 years old with that skills at your own peril.

Makes me think of the guy who use to short sell Tesla stock in 2020 and then one day he woke up bankrupt with a position 2000% against him. After all it had difficulty delivering car, was on the verge of bankruptcy, etc. Many similarities with the current discourse on Slaf even tho two very different subject.
Tesla was
There is a lot of similitude. The mob were calling Tesla stocks overvalued, on the verge of bankruptcy, incapable of delivering their command, there was doubt over their factory, etc. In a similar fashion that everyone is now denying Slaf talent, no IQ, no understanding of the game, close of being a bust.

Short float was at an all time high. Like everyone and his mother is now down on Slaf.

Technically speaking, the stock was not in all time high. It was on a basing stage called Weinstein Phase 1(accumulation phase where selling pressure is suddenly meet and sustained by buyers, but the general feeling over the stock is usually very grim.) It took one good Earnings reports to take the stock into stage 2(uptrend stage) and eventually to a massive rise.

One could say Slaf is kinda in a stage 1 in his development whereas some players like Cooley or Mintyukov have already broke out into stage 2.

Obviously, there is a lot of discrepancy between a stock and a hockey player.

But just like the mob were only focusing on the problems and short term, repairable issue. They were blind to the absolute potential and upside in the company.

Its similar to Slaf in which now everyone is dismissing the upside and the skills. Everyone is focusing on short term issue.

Its possible Slaf bust. Its possible we are on the wrong track with him.

But its at your own peril to bet against this kind of potential at 19 years old. He might also just be one earnings report (a couple of goals) from breaking out. Young player performance can explode on a dime. Its witnessable everytime throughout the league. Like Tesla, and although it appears far and impossible right now, Slaf is one good stretch away from seeing his stock at all time high again.
Stocks, especially ones like Tesla,are such a bad comparison. The price is driven almost completely by hype, speculation and market conditions. Not real world changes.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
Stop it, man. Tesla was being supplemented by carbon credits up the wazoo, it was just a matter of time before it picked up. Your analogy is fundamentally flawed as Tesla wasn't nearly at the same place as Slaf. Tesla had already conquered the stock market. Slaf hasn't conquered shit. A fundamental flaw that kills any other parallel you try to make between them.

Slaf is a lot more like Lion right now. Much much better analogy.

I would say its just a matter of times before Slaf picks up man.

He is 19 years old christ. The chance are that he evolves, mature and improves. The anomaly would be that he stagnate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,466
23,118
Edmonton
I would say its just a matter of times before Slaf picks up man.

He is 19 years old christ. The chance are that he evolves, mature and improves. The anomaly would be that he stagnate.
Improves to what exactly?
 

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
36,183
34,327
Hockey Mecca
Stop it. "Remove the decade of terrible picks and Timmins was actually good"

The two years with Gauthier we had very few picks and picked relatively low.

Seriously, go look at the drafting before 2018 and after 2018 until Bergevin/Timmins leave. It's day and night. Yes, we had better drafting power after 2018, but also made much better choices with lesser picks. Bergevin is also a known control freak. Only a promotion like that could change that dynamic and it did. Timmins had to block Bergevin from trading the pick, moments before drafting Caufield, which represents the inverse relationship that probably held before the promotion. Timmins's last 4 drafts were pretty good overall. Couple that with his 6 years with Gainey and we can easily see a strange dive that happened post-2012.
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,194
4,027
Slaf has no motor!

See for yourself in the first 20 second of this clip!



It does not take a motor nor any power at all to outskate a Franchise level D like Dahlin.

When you are stealing a puck at the blue line you are going to be faster than your opponent because you are facing the puck while he has to turn around. If anything, the fact that the other D managed to come back does not support Slaf being an outstanding skater.
 

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,466
23,118
Edmonton
The two years with Gauthier we had very few picks and picked relatively low.

Seriously, go look at the drafting before 2018 and after 2018 until Bergevin/Timmins leave. It's day and night. Yes, we had better drafting power after 2018, but also made much better choices with lesser picks. Bergevin is also a known control freak. Only a promotion like that could change that dynamic and it did. Timmins had to block Bergevin from trading the pick, moments before drafting Caufield, which represents the inverse relationship that probably held before the promotion. Timmins's last 4 drafts were pretty good overall. Couple that with his 6 years with Gainey and we can easily see a strange dive that happened post-2012.
Timmins was dog shit from 03-06 and 2008-2018. That spanned 3 general managers.

Stop it right now.

When you are stealing a puck at the blue line you are going to be faster than your opponent because you are facing the puck while he has to turn around. If anything, the fact that the other D managed to come back does not support Slaf being an outstanding skater.
Omg are we going to have to watch that clip 50 times to prove how good slaf is?
 
Last edited:

HabsForHire

"Expect the unexpected"
Sep 21, 2011
3,582
3,663
CT
So would management be hesitant to send him down because that is a reflection on their drafting? Especially if the last 2 games were tough, I feel its all about timing and optics with this team
I fear the same thing, they won't send him down because that's them admitting to a mistake. egos are far to big with this team. and his confidence will continue to deteriorate every single game. he is INVISIBLE
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Drebin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad