We're witnessing the birth of the greatest bust of this century.Hey guys, so after watching the last couple games I just have a few questions:
What the f***? No but really, what the f*** is going on here?
Trust the process or somethingHey guys, so after watching the last couple games I just have a few questions:
What the f***? No but really, what the f*** is going on here?
Something something Tage ThompsonHey guys, so after watching the last couple games I just have a few questions:
What the f***? No but really, what the f*** is going on here?
Okay, so then why wouldn't you play him on the first line? Everyone else has gotten a shot? And that line can use some size. If you're going to let him be bad at least let him develop with better players.Montreal not developing a powerforward in the last 20yrs really shows in this thread... I don't see a big issue with getting him some time in the AHL, but the focus really needs to be on a couple years from now. That frame is going to take time, it almost always does.
They're willing to let him not be great as he figures his game out. He's getting good minutes and opportunities (though I'd definitely look to change up his linemates) in the meantime.
Just chill. We're in a rebuild. This is what development looks like for some players.
Imagine we have a 1OA pick that we don't even want to play on 3 on 3, or put in the first 3 shooters for shootouts, because he is just average in every facet of the game.
Montreal not developing a powerforward in the last 20yrs really shows in this thread... I don't see a big issue with getting him some time in the AHL, but the focus really needs to be on a couple years from now. That frame is going to take time, it almost always does.
They're willing to let him not be great as he figures his game out. He's getting good minutes and opportunities (though I'd definitely look to change up his linemates) in the meantime.
Just chill. We're in a rebuild. This is what development looks like for some players.
Okay, so then why wouldn't you play him on the first line? Everyone else has gotten a shot? And that line can use some size. If you're going to let him be bad at least let him develop with better players.
What in Slafkovsky's game suggests he's a power forward? At most he's a finesse player who can maybe one day learn to use his height/weight to not get knocked down so easily.Montreal not developing a powerforward in the last 20yrs really shows in this thread... I don't see a big issue with getting him some time in the AHL, but the focus really needs to be on a couple years from now. That frame is going to take time, it almost always does.
They're willing to let him not be great as he figures his game out. He's getting good minutes and opportunities (though I'd definitely look to change up his linemates) in the meantime.
Just chill. We're in a rebuild. This is what development looks like for some players.
Sure, I don't see anything wrong with giving him a shot there. I'd just want to be confident he doesn't revert to being a gopher for those two.
Ideally, I'd staple him to Monahan for the time being. Great vet, actual offensive talent... maybe even play some big boy hockey depending on who they put with them.
What in Slafkovsky's game suggests he's a power forward? At most he's a finesse player who can maybe one day learn to use his height/weight to not get knocked down so easily.
I do not agree.PWF in the modern context. Size, speed, hands, and reach are all there. Regardless of his size on paper, I'm not surprised that a 19yo still growing into his frame isn't physically dominating the NHL and/or struggling with the physical parts of the game. Project his tools with better timing and greater core/lower body strength as he grows and gains experience. He's shown it at other levels, we'll see if he continues to develop.
Not sure what you mean by growing when he is already one of the heaviest players in the NHL. He doesn't show that willingness to engage by going to the net or knocking people down. That doesn't just suddenly come just because he's big. He's closer to maybe being a better Armia than a a real PWF by being a better Anderson.PWF in the modern context. Size, speed, hands, and reach are all there. Regardless of his size on paper, I'm not surprised that a 19yo still growing into his frame isn't physically dominating the NHL and/or struggling with the physical parts of the game. Project his tools with better timing and greater core/lower body strength as he grows and gains experience. He's shown it at other levels, we'll see if he continues to develop.
That's all he's shown he's capable of doing so far this year: digging for pucks. No initiative with the puck on his stick whatsoever. What people are expecting him to learn by not ever having the puck on his stick is beyond me. Must be some big brain deep hockey knowledge.
Most? Man, what?Its NOT a development problem. Its a.n EVALUATION problem. Player is bad. Most of us saw it before the draft and were loud about it.
If I recall correctly, even with a lot of people moving off of Wright, the grand majority still wanted Wright. Slaf was very much slotted in second compared to the rest. Yes, there were Cooley fans but I think even Nemec was favoured over Cooley here.There was a big group of people who moved off of Wright when all the things that made him fall to fourth came out. And Slafkovsky was at the bottom of a lot of peoples lists.
let me tell you this , if the scouts said that he was a guaranteed top 3 then the scouts are dogshit at their job. Nothing in his gameplay in the junior made him worth being a top 3 over the other 6-7 players in the top 10. Scouts just went apeshit because of that stupid tournament. He was not even speedy or playing as a powerforward in his league.Most? Man, what?
Slafkovsky was a concensus top 3 pick in his draft year.
I don't think I have seen any final rankings with him outside the top 5.
That's not the definition of a player that everyone saw as "bad" and was loudly crapping on...