Wow. You used one entire season to build your argument... Impressive
(Newsflash, 50 games is not "an entire season")
You offered a weak take built off of a poor use (or poor understanding) of cherry picked statistics, followed by post after post trying to salvage that weak take.
Rinse. Repeat.
You prefer Cooley to Slaf... Good for you. I don't think that opinion holds up now, and I think it will look even more foolish as time goes by...
but an opinion is an opinion. Power to you.
Twisting small sample sizes to try to give your opinion some kind of statistical grounding is cute, but not at all convincing. The poor use of statistics you've shown only highlights how little you know about either player & their respective development context.
Have a take, don't suck... But more importantly, don't cry or get upset when your bad take is exposed as such.