Friedman: JT Miller to get the Zibanejad contract?

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,197
14,662
Kansas City, MO
Seems fair. Similar caliber of player IMO. Nothing wrong with that for a 1C - but is Vancouver going to be the one to invest in that? The tweet doesn’t really say if that’s what JTM wants or something Vancouver is agreeable to?
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,077
10,791
I like Miller as a player, but that's total overpayment for him.
The 8.5 isn't an overpayment for what's he's done in the last 2-3 seasons. I think fans might not want the 8 year part of that contract that Zibanejad got. But as far as cap hit only, it's about what we all expected with the way he's been playing.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,563
20,781
Toronto, ON
Ooof, that is steep. I just don’t get why gms keep doing this to themselves. There is a good chance he might not be worth that contract for the whole duration of it. You’re not buying his best years, his best years may in fact been the last couple of seasons. Sometimes these guys have very short peaks. It is a gamble for sure.
 

Luck 6

\\_______
Oct 17, 2008
10,302
2,008
Vancouver
8.5mil for Miller isn’t bad at all, he’s on pace for 100 points heh. I’d hope we could get a reduced term, but that cap hit is just fine by me.
 

CloutierForVezina

Registered User
May 13, 2009
5,353
1,257
Edmonton, Alberta
JT Miller is an outstanding player... today. He's probably got another 2-3 years of high level play in him. For a contender on the cusp, he could be the piece that pushes them over the top.

8.5M x 8Y is a recipe for absolute disaster for the Canucks that would set this franchise back for a decade.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,293
21,176
Ooof, that is steep. I just don’t get why gms keep doing this to themselves. There is a good chance he might not be worth that contract for the whole duration of it. You’re not buying his best years, his best years may in fact been the last couple of seasons. Sometimes these guys have very short peaks. It is a gamble for sure.
GMs don't always have the luxury of worrying about the back end of the contract. Odds are the GM will be gone long before that contract ends. If the player's remaining productive years align with the team's window, you take it and worry about the back end when it happens.

Miller will be 30 when his next contract begins, so he's definitely on the older side for that type of deal, which is no doubt why Vancouver explored trading him. Any team that signs him better believe he makes them a cup contender, then hope he can play well long enough for them to win one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanuckCity

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
155,711
109,793
Tarnation
Ooof, that is steep. I just don’t get why gms keep doing this to themselves. There is a good chance he might not be worth that contract for the whole duration of it. You’re not buying his best years, his best years may in fact been the last couple of seasons. Sometimes these guys have very short peaks. It is a gamble for sure.

Never underestimate a GM's ability to burn his employer's money. Fools and their money and all that.
 

LaVal

Registered User
Dec 13, 2002
6,757
2,441
Kelowna
Nothing wrong with that figure, it's the term that will be the concerning part. He'll be 30 when he's on his next contract. If it's 4-5 years then it should be relatively fine. Any longer would be very risky.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CanuckCity

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,376
32,172
He will be 30 at the start of the next contract, I really hope Alvin and Rutherford dont Benning this up and sign JT into his mid-late 30s
 
  • Like
Reactions: vadim sharifijanov

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,077
10,791
Ooof, that is steep. I just don’t get why gms keep doing this to themselves. There is a good chance he might not be worth that contract for the whole duration of it. You’re not buying his best years, his best years may in fact been the last couple of seasons. Sometimes these guys have very short peaks. It is a gamble for sure.
Because some other GM will do it. You lose the player if you say "Nope, we're not giving you that term". Some GM will take that chance and make their team better for the next 3 or so years while your team loses a player like JT. We can blame GM's for giving out these contracts but the players aren't signing for less. I think it'll be more like 7 years assuming they find a cap number Miller likes.
 

OrangePMD

Registered User
Feb 2, 2021
356
359
Finland
Nothing wrong with that figure, it's the term that will be the concerning part. He'll be 30 when he's on his next contract. If it's also 5 years like the Zibanejad contract then it should be relatively fine. Any longer would be very risky.
Zibanejad contract is 8 years and 68 million (60 mil in bonuses + 8 million salary). That is what Miller apparently wants, 60+ million in guaranteed money. Will he get that contract, probably not.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad