Player Discussion JT Miller Thread

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
But this whole having 5 forwards on the ice idea is precisely what the other teams thought when the Sharks acquired him. Certainly, Karlsson and Burns had their moments as a dynamic dual and they did make a run in Karlsson's first year. Don't get me wrong, prime Karlsson was something to behold. Then again, prime OEL was certainly a strong contender for being a top 5 Dman.

If Penguins retain, there isn't a whole lot of risk to Karlsson. He would only have 2 more years left after this season. I think Karlsson can still put up points if he can stay healthy and you let him play his game. If you want him to be a systems defender and expect him to defend well he's not your guy. I'm not sure that he would be a fit alongside Hughes.
Karlsson with Hughes would be a disaster. Hughes needs someone that can cover for him when he pinches for offense, not someone who is going to double down on that offence and be absolutely woeful when trying to defend or cover for his D partner.

Karlsson's defending is that bad, it's not worth the offensive value he brings at this stage in his career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExarKun80 and Hodgy
It's weird how JT ends up being more noticeable via events, like the faceoffs and hitting the post, and then get worked in terms of possession.

Interesting stat discussed on the radio: Miller and Boeser get 50% more Ozone starts per 60 min when compared to Pettersson, and Pettersson is 7th in that regard amongst forwards. Something to keep in mind when evaluating Miller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExarKun80
It's weird how JT ends up being more noticeable via events, like the faceoffs and hitting the post, and then get worked in terms of possession.

Interesting stat discussed on the radio: Miller and Boeser get 50% more Ozone starts per 60 min when compared to Pettersson, and Pettersson is 7th in that regard amongst forwards. Something to keep in mind when evaluating Miller.

Based on how they play, it only makes sense to use Miller as an offensive forward and Pettersson as a defensive.

Miller can be a liability defensively when not dialed in and Pettersson has been anemic offensively for almost a year now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flakes15 and Hodgy
Based on how they play, it only makes sense to use Miller as an offensive forward and Pettersson as a defensive.

Miller can be a liability defensively when not dialed in and Pettersson has been anemic offensively for almost a year now.


It does if you want the status quo. It does not if you want Pettersson to have the best chance to regain his offense.

By underlying numbers, Pettersson is the better offensive and defensive driver. Not converter, driver. And so, if you want more conversion from him, put him in the Miller deployment.

Miller can have Suter and Boeser to shelter him defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supercanuck
It does if you want the status quo. It does not if you want Pettersson to have the best chance to regain his offense.

By underlying numbers, Pettersson is the better offensive and defensive driver. Not converter, driver. And so, if you want more conversion from him, put him in the Miller deployment.

Miller can have Suter and Boeser to shelter him defensively.
I think Tocchet could definitely do a better job of getting Pettersson out there for offensive draws more often. Too many times the 3rd or 4th line comes out for an ozone draw when the big guys are rested.

But if I'm choosing between the two I'm 100% putting Miller out there over Pettersson - he's produced more since the start of last year and provides a better chance at winning the draw back to Hughes for him to do something with the puck.

And best of both worlds option - get them out together for ozone draws like Edmonton does with their guys.
 
I think Tocchet could definitely do a better job of getting Pettersson out there for offensive draws more often. Too many times the 3rd or 4th line comes out for an ozone draw when the big guys are rested.

But if I'm choosing between the two I'm 100% putting Miller out there over Pettersson - he's produced more since the start of last year and provides a better chance at winning the draw back to Hughes for him to do something with the puck.

And best of both worlds option - get them out together for ozone draws like Edmonton does with their guys.

They don't work together, but worth a shot.

For keeping the same deployment: Then expect more of the same.

Last game, they hinted at what I'm looking for: Pettersson was on a worse line, relative to Miller, but each had decent time with Hughes. The Pettersson line generated 2 goals (Hughes did), but Pettersson did not get any Grade A chances himself. Miller got a few great chances, but his line got caved possession wise (despite Hughes). If Pettersson can generate a few more noticeable chances within that framework, then that's truly the best of both worlds. Possession and chances instead of just chances.

Miller would still have his ability to convert on the 2nd line and Pettersson could regain his ability to convert on the 1st line.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad