Groo
Registered User
Physician heal thyselfI’m hurting because I’m telling people to actually use their brains and think before they post?
LMFAO, ok.
Physician heal thyselfI’m hurting because I’m telling people to actually use their brains and think before they post?
LMFAO, ok.
For the last time, I didn't specifically say you were hurting, my god. I asked "WHO is this hurting?" as in who is getting hurt from reading bad trade proposals. The answer should be nobody, obviously because that would be dumb to get hurt over such a trivial thing. Stop taking it like I'm attacking you personally because I'm not.No, you unwittingly continue to do so and it’s hilarious to watch.
If you don’t see how asking if someone is “hurting” on a hockey forum because they told you to actually think before you post is preposterous, you might want to re-evaluate things.
I’m done here though, you’ve proven my point plenty.
For the last time, I didn't specifically say you were hurting, my god. I asked "WHO is this hurting?" as in who is getting hurt from reading bad trade proposals. The answer should be nobody, obviously because that would be dumb to get hurt over such a trivial thing. Stop taking it like I'm attacking you personally because I'm not.
Lmao I guess soMaybe the poster thought you wrote, “You! Is this hurting?”.
Yes you are, you are getting heated over trade proposals that will likely never happen, on a website nobody cares about. "That'll be the day when they stop making bad trade proposals rofl" I wish you knew how goofy that sounds.
Can we focus on the fact that there are Wild fans claiming they can't squeeze JT Miller at 2.6M into the salary cap structure? It's weird to me
The 1st and Lambos being off the table isn't really coming from fans at this point, it's coming from the beat writer. It's not a reflection of Miller's potential trade value. The team just doesn't seem to be in the market.Yeah point per game center plays all situations signed 2.6 for 2 years - and a late 1st and Lambos are 'off the table'.
I get it. Guerin won't move a Boldy or Rossi it would be an enormous gamble. But if you want a premier forward at 50% who is already on a friendly contract, Boldy or Rossi would be where the conversation is. That's precisely why these teams are not a good match and a trade is very unlikely.
The idea of a 2 yr rental is precisely why Miller's value is so ridiculously high and as the trade deadline approaches I just really doubt a GM will splurge on JTM. Trading Miller in the off season when there are more players in the game driving up prices is looking more and more likely with each day that passes.
Yeah point per game center plays all situations signed 2.6 for 2 years - and a late 1st and Lambos are 'off the table'.
I get it. Guerin won't move a Boldy or Rossi it would be an enormous gamble. But if you want a premier forward at 50% who is already on a friendly contract, Boldy or Rossi would be where the conversation is. That's precisely why these teams are not a good match and a trade is very unlikely.
The idea of a 2 yr rental is precisely why Miller's value is so ridiculously high and as the trade deadline approaches I just really doubt a GM will splurge on JTM. Trading Miller in the off season when there are more players in the game driving up prices is looking more and more likely with each day that passes.
Can we focus on the fact that there are Wild fans claiming they can't squeeze JT Miller at 2.6M into the salary cap structure? It's weird to me
Can we focus on the fact that there are Wild fans claiming they can't squeeze JT Miller at 2.6M into the salary cap structure? It's weird to me
Can we just be blunt , and say as I have read about the ask from JT Miller, its has come from Canucks fans. and the media about how your team's GM is asking for, yet at same time GM's never get what they ask for. Boldy, or Rossi seems to have selectively come from Canucks Twitter fans, and some like yourself on here.
They did?Minnesota offered Fiala+Greenway+2nd to Benning and he turned it down. I'm guessing if you switch the 2nd to a 1st, that would be the minimum price for Rutherford.
Minnesota offered Fiala+Greenway+2nd to Benning and he turned it down. I'm guessing if you switch the 2nd to a 1st, that would be the minimum price for Rutherford.
They did?
He's also been treated like some complimentary rental piece on lots of proposals. He's a premier forward and these types of players aren't commonly available.
Look at previous deadlines to see what rentals go for - then consider Miller would be a 2 yr rental on excellent term.
Doesn't actually seem like you read my post. I'm pretty understanding of the fact that Miller is unlikely to be traded because the demands are too high.
Aaah. If we're talking about Kuzma's article even that doesn't speculate about Fiala and Greenway, just that it'd make sense for Minnesota to be offering one of them plus a high pick.There was some article from a Vancouver based writer that speculated that the Wild might offer that or something similar and I guess certain people took that to mean the Wild definitely offered that and the Canucks declined.
So with all due respect, his upcoming free agency next year will absolutely play a role. So you said previously trade deadline deals, taylor hall went for 2nd round pick. Nick foligno went for 1st and prospect because Toronto bid against themselves. Not one person is saying he's a complementary piece, but there's a difference between what Canucks fans are seeking, what your gm is asking, and what the returns are. GM's don't get the pieces they ask for.
the objective is to create a team that's a contender over a long period. this isn't an "all-in" year where you'd give up assets you will need in the next 4-5 years for an upgrade this year. We can fit him in, but not without hurting the real objective.
the objective is to create a team that's a contender over a long period. this isn't an "all-in" year where you'd give up assets you will need in the next 4-5 years for an upgrade this year. We can fit him in, but not without hurting the real objective.
Teams climb the ladder by adding veteran talent not waiting around and hoping the new guys can come in and put a team over the top. Otherwise the only way to catch those teams is when they start to decline or they are beset by injuryI don’t think it’s smart because Minnesota isn’t a JT Miller away from being better than Colorado, Carolina, Tampa. This move is a year early. Next two years, the team should be at least as good with all the prospects in the system. Also, Canucks fans will understand the hesitancy of taking 1st round picks out of Brackett’s hands. Perhaps I’m being overly cautious, but I think Minnesota is better off waiting.
Teams climb the ladder by adding veteran talent not waiting around and hoping the new guys can come in and put a team over the top. Otherwise the only way to catch those teams is when they start to decline or they are beset by injury