Player Discussion Josh Norris (C) 6’-1” - Part 3

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,822
7,779
He’s looked light to me the last two games. I saw him lose a battle last night late in the game that he clearly should have won and it bummed me out. He hasn’t won his fair share of puck battles recently and he looked rushed with the puck last night and vs Buffalo he couldn’t find any space.

With Pinto out and the matchups changing I think it’s taken a toll on Josh. That entire line has gone quiet since Pinto went down and the last few games we are seeing Norris isn’t impacting the game at either end of the ice right now.
 

coladin

Registered User
Sep 18, 2009
11,981
4,739
He’s looked light to me the last two games. I saw him lose a battle last night late in the game that he clearly should have won and it bummed me out. He hasn’t won his fair share of puck battles recently and he looked rushed with the puck last night and vs Buffalo he couldn’t find any space.

With Pinto out and the matchups changing I think it’s taken a toll on Josh. That entire line has gone quiet since Pinto went down and the last few games we are seeing Norris isn’t impacting the game at either end of the ice right now.
Playing hard and not scared. Had some good chances again. I thought Batherson dragged that line down last night
 

Agent Zuuuub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
15,199
12,678
He’s looked light to me the last two games. I saw him lose a battle last night late in the game that he clearly should have won and it bummed me out. He hasn’t won his fair share of puck battles recently and he looked rushed with the puck last night and vs Buffalo he couldn’t find any space.

With Pinto out and the matchups changing I think it’s taken a toll on Josh. That entire line has gone quiet since Pinto went down and the last few games we are seeing Norris isn’t impacting the game at either end of the ice right now.

He is the weakest 6ft2 player I have ever seen.

What the hell would happen in the playoffs?

Whoops thought we were talking about Chabot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tuna99

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,505
7,958
Glad the trade talk has simmered down. When he’s at his best value, he is most valuable to us.

So happy that he’s back to what he was showing before he went down to injury.

Obviously there is some trepidation about reinjury, but damn is he playing a solid 200 foot game, scoring, winning faceoffs, playing PP and PK, and taking the tough matchups.

This is a centre we need! Feels good
If someone wanted him without us taking cap back i would do it.
 

L'Aveuglette

つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Jan 8, 2007
48,503
20,778
Montreal
If someone wanted him without us taking cap back i would do it.

We should have traded him long ago. He's more likely to get seriously re-injured than not, and his play isn't good enough to warrant that contract. Obviously though, no team would take him unless we took cap back or ate a large portion of his salary.
 

KevinRedkey

12/18/23 and beyond!
Jan 22, 2010
10,501
5,765
If someone wanted him without us taking cap back i would do it.

He has never and likely will never be worth his contract. I'd trade him as well, but only if we miss the playoffs. The room is probably pretty fragile, and Norris is seen as one of the leaders on the team.

Batherson and him averaging out to just under 6.500 each is the spin I need to make it feel more positive sometimes. lol
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,822
7,779
He is the weakest 6ft2 player I have ever seen.

What the hell would happen in the playoffs?

Whoops thought we were talking about Chabot.

Word might be out in the league Ottawa D down low are light, seems to be the test why the last few games form the opposition
 

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,729
15,261
He looks hesitant to take one-timers. Was set up several times late last game and eventually let a single one go, right into the body of the opposition.

Part of what made him so deadly in 21/22 (and what got him his contract) was his ability to unleash wicked one-timers consistently, even if the passes to him weren't perfect.

Hopefully it's a mental thing and not an issue with a lack of flexibility/mobility with his shoulder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Good in Osgoode

Registered User
Jan 15, 2018
371
416
Osgoode
He has never and likely will never be worth his contract. I'd trade him as well, but only if we miss the playoffs. The room is probably pretty fragile, and Norris is seen as one of the leaders on the team.

Batherson and him averaging out to just under 6.500 each is the spin I need to make it feel more positive sometimes. lol
I am really pulling for Norris and would love to see him have a bounce back year. Would be happy with a 30/30 type season.
That said, the contracts for Norris (and Chabot) really restrict what this team can do going forward.

Unless Giroux is completely coming off the books and I do think that he is coming back at a slight discount, say $5 to $5.5m, there is going to be no cap space to do anything more than Cousins/Gregor type additions.

Even if they are considering making significant change, Norris and/or Chabot will need to come off the books to allow for that to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KevinRedkey

DrEasy

Out rumptackling
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2010
11,402
7,261
Stützville
He looks hesitant to take one-timers. Was set up several times late last game and eventually let a single one go, right into the body of the opposition.

Part of what made him so deadly in 21/22 (and what got him his contract) was his ability to unleash wicked one-timers consistently, even if the passes to him weren't perfect.

Hopefully it's a mental thing and not an issue with a lack of flexibility/mobility with his shoulder.
I still notice that, just like last year, he mishandles hard passes. If you can't control the passes you receive, how can you make plays, or shoot? I guess at least with one-timers there's no need to handle the pass lol, but we're not even seeing those anymore.
 

vandelay

Registered User
Nov 3, 2022
64
67
He’s looked light to me the last two games. I saw him lose a battle last night late in the game that he clearly should have won and it bummed me out. He hasn’t won his fair share of puck battles recently and he looked rushed with the puck last night and vs Buffalo he couldn’t find any space.

With Pinto out and the matchups changing I think it’s taken a toll on Josh. That entire line has gone quiet since Pinto went down and the last few games we are seeing Norris isn’t impacting the game at either end of the ice right now.
I might be his biggest advocate on this site but I agree, he hasn't had tge same juice he started with.
In some ways, looking ahead, that's good news. Lots of doomsdayers saying this team is what it is but with a guy like Norris, he's clearly not yet at his best. If he can get back to the level he had earlier or beyond and be consistent, my bet is we see consistency from the team as a whole as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tuna99 and OD99

PlayersLtd

Registered User
Mar 6, 2019
1,448
1,798
I see some people spun their wheel recently and it landed on "trade Norris"...

So who's the replacement player I ask? The guy who is injured right now or the guy who doesn't look entirely comfortable in the top 6?

So let's say it's a UFA in the offseason and we're looking for better value, save some money and gamble on someone who is about to peak. One name that jumps off the page is Jack Roslovic...

Yay. Jack Roslovic. That's the type of replacement you'd be looking to bet on. Do you really want a Jack Roslovic class player at 5.5 (if he maintains his pace) for second line C over Norris at 8? You aren't a better team in that scenario.

The only way you do it is if it's part of a larger shake up and you somehow come out of it with a surefire young second line C which we all know is very, very difficult to achieve.

Norris has the talent, that isn't the problem. The problem is getting the players around him to help him thrive and vice versa. Teams face these issues all the time and the only option for now, shy of gutting our centre depth, is letting them work through it and finding the form they showed in the first 8 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandelay

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
67,124
52,815
I might be his biggest advocate on this site but I agree, he hasn't had tge same juice he started with.
In some ways, looking ahead, that's good news. Lots of doomsdayers saying this team is what it is but with a guy like Norris, he's clearly not yet at his best. If he can get back to the level he had earlier or beyond and be consistent, my bet is we see consistency from the team as a whole as well.

I find he comes and goes and so does Batherson. I think Batherson has more talent and Norris has better defensive fundamentals .
Their inconsistency ... and they are not the only ones needs to improve. The young core forward group is still not there maturity wise..
 

armani

High Jacques
Apr 8, 2005
10,095
5,105
Uranus
So glad to see Norris hitting his stride after missing so much hockey, I was of the minority who believed that he was already developed and skilled enough to come back and contribute as 2C. I am so glad to see the patented Norris one timer make it’s comeback on the Sens first goal against the Bruins tonight. A scoring centre is such a valuable asset and we have three of them (and Gaudette).
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,505
7,958
So glad to see Norris hitting his stride after missing so much hockey, I was of the minority who believed that he was already developed and skilled enough to come back and contribute as 2C. I am so glad to see the patented Norris one timer make it’s comeback on the Sens first goal against the Bruins tonight. A scoring centre is such a valuable asset and we have three of them (and Gaudette).
Good goal today

He needs to be better and bring it most nights. Im not convinced he has the ability to drive play on his line
 

PlayOn

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
1,918
2,490
Norris saying he hasn’t scratched the surface of what he can be is exactly how I feel about him. IMO he is a long-term investment bc the shoulder surgeries inevitably delayed him, but I think in a year or two he will really elevate. He still does a ton of good out there even now, he’s just not as strong on the puck as you’d like. I think Green is doing a good job of molding him into a two way centre that plays all situations.
 

DylanSensFan

BEESHIP: NBH
Aug 3, 2010
9,900
2,106
Calgary
We should have traded him long ago. He's more likely to get seriously re-injured than not, and his play isn't good enough to warrant that contract. Obviously though, no team would take him unless we took cap back or ate a large portion of his salary.
I see Norris improving mostly. I feel like we're going to get the 40-goal Norris back by the end of this season.

Norris saying he hasn’t scratched the surface of what he can be is exactly how I feel about him. IMO he is a long-term investment bc the shoulder surgeries inevitably delayed him, but I think in a year or two he will really elevate. He still does a ton of good out there even now, he’s just not as strong on the puck as you’d like. I think Green is doing a good job of molding him into a two way centre that plays all situations.
He seemed pretty hard on the puck tonight. He seemed chippy. I like the way he's trending.
 

DylanSensFan

BEESHIP: NBH
Aug 3, 2010
9,900
2,106
Calgary
I think he’s been chippy all year. He battles hard, but idk if the strength is always there to accomplish what he wants to.
I am not sure if it's strength or indecision. Since he hasn't been playing, he likely thinks plays a lot more than if he had played hundreds of games. Boston also has an overall chippy team, so it was interesting to see his reaction to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayOn

PlayOn

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
1,918
2,490
I am not sure if it's strength or indecision. Since he hasn't been playing, he likely thinks plays a lot more than if he had played hundreds of games. Boston also has an overall chippy team, so it was interesting to see his reaction to them.
Yeah I agree, I think it’s a bit of both tbh, cause sometimes he fumbles pucks for no apparent reason. But it’s still much better than last year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad