Value of: Josh Manson to the Leafs at the deadline
- Thread starter LEAFANFORLIFE23
- Start date
My guess with retention they ask for a first coming back
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,489
- 39,326
I imagine ducks will sell him at 50%... and would be hoping for a 1st. Maybe a 2nd or 3rd + solid prospect.
There would def be a market on him.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,489
- 39,326
I mean they could extend him... and playing like what exactly? Team has been missing significant pieces the last few weeks, due to covid running through the line up.
Gibson Fowler Lindholm Zegras Getzlaf Terry Milano Comtois Stolarz prob a few others i missed have all missed time over the last 10 games or so.
Anaheim selling would flood the market. Possible trade options in that scenario include Giordano, Lindholm, Chiarot and Leddy on the left, with Klingberg, Ristolainen and Manson on the right. The top guy(s) will bring back quality returns, but there could be a mega squeeze on this year's 2nd/3rd tier type targets that would be 1st tier in a different year.
I could see him getting that but I also wonder how many 1sts will be available because quite a few have already been traded.
Colorado, Vegas, Florida, Carolina have all traded their 1st.
Makes me wonder how many 1sts we see move at the deadline
A1LeafNation
Good, is simply not good enough!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,808
- 17,957
If I'm the ducks I'm keeping Manson for the playoff run.
A couple of mediocre assets aren't as valuable as those young guys playing some meaningful games to end the season and maybe in the playoffs.
A couple of mediocre assets aren't as valuable as those young guys playing some meaningful games to end the season and maybe in the playoffs.
BobClarkesfrontteeth
Registered User
But who will catch them? The Oilers? The Flames? they are playing worse than Anaheim.
MMC
Global Moderator
The Flames are well ahead of us based on points % making us 4th in the division with the Oilers not far behind
The Moose is Loose
Registered User
50% retained Manson for a 1st
Simple, clean, and makes sense
Simple, clean, and makes sense
ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,998
- 6,086
Leonardo87
New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Meh, Ducks have exceeded expectations this season so far, but they are not a playoff team yet. They need to stay the course and if they cannot re-sign Manson to what they want have to move him for assets, even if its not for much, better than losing him for nothing.
Last edited:
terranraida
#RyanGetzlafIsASaint
we dont have to do this. this isn't 2017. We dont have to have JVR or whoever for Manson posts anymore.
I dont disagree with this mentality if you think your potential 1st round opponent is weak.
If Manson gets you through the first round, id say keep him and get the extra experience.
If he makes it so you loose in 6 instead of 4 or 5... I would take the assets IMO.
I dont like the idea of 'own rentals' when you know you are a severe severe underdrog.
I disagreed with it for Bozak, Gardiner and JVR when we snuck into the playoffs, as we did nothing and lost out on a few higher picks / prospects. Winning an extra game in the first round didnt do anything for us, but an extra few 1st rounders would have been nice.
A 1st for 50% Manson is IMO worth it but if Anaheim is indeed opening the floodgates I would rather pay the extra top prospect plus whatever it would take to bring Lindholm to TO
The Leafs Would need Demott going back the other way to make salary work. Dermott+ 1st for Manson@50%, not sure how ducks feel about that.
Especially at 50% retention, I'd expect/want more than just a late middle to late late first round pick. Probably not a huge amount more, but a decent prospect or a (projected higher than the decent prospect) reclamation project/someone needing a change of scenery on top of the pick.
I think Anaheim re-signs Lindholm no matter what. Trading him would signify a complete tear down, and that's just not how the Ducks operate.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
OT: 2024 Washington Commanders thread: change we can believe in!- Latest: Devil Dancer
-
-
