Player Discussion Joonas Korpisalo

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,109
11,298
NWO
Do we have a list somewhere of which goalies making the minimum this offseason? Would they be worth risking the chance they don't play well here just to shave 2 mill off the cap?
I mean in a cap world it just depends what you value. If they (or you) are okay paying 11 mil to a tandem that is working, that's completely fine.

I on the other hand think I'd rather risk a less than stellar backup at min money (or 1 to 1.5 mil) and spend that money up front instead, especially if you can turn Korpi into another asset.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,513
24,742
Looks like the bruins #1 goalie at this point. I don’t even see how it can be debated. This team can’t score. So they can’t afford to let in 4-5 goals a game. Seems korpisalo should be taking the reins for the time being.

I'd wager both guys will get a decent taste of the next 8 games. Maybe a 5 to 3 split. Possible Korpisalo's way.

The game vs. Winnipeg on Dec. 10th will tell the tale. If Korpisalo starts that game and plays well, he might get the bulk of the action between then and New Year's Day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeIsAStud and Kegs

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,985
28,204
Medfield, MA
I mean in a cap world it just depends what you value. If they (or you) are okay paying 11 mil to a tandem that is working, that's completely fine.

I on the other hand think I'd rather risk a less than stellar backup at min money (or 1 to 1.5 mil) and spend that money up front instead, especially if you can turn Korpi into another asset.
The hope is you get lucky with a league minimum signing (like Heinen) but you're probably more likely to end up with a dud (like Jones, Tufte) in net.

Take away Korpisalo's 4 wins and the Bruins are in last overall in the league. They're done. Even if they win their next 4 they'd be out of the playoff picture on Thanksgiving and that usually means no playoffs. (No playoffs means no playoff revenue.)

Is there a $2m forward ($1m for the backup, $2m forward = Korpi's $3m) they could have signed that would be such a difference maker that he'd give them 4 more wins in their first 20 games?
 

bruins cup

Registered User
Jun 29, 2024
154
155
Swayman will get it together and be very solid for us this will be a very good 1-2 tandem going forward the goalie is really only as good as the team in front of them last night it was a good step forward if we play like that we will get the goaltending necessary to win games
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,352
22,233
Maine
I mean in a cap world it just depends what you value. If they (or you) are okay paying 11 mil to a tandem that is working, that's completely fine.

I on the other hand think I'd rather risk a less than stellar backup at min money (or 1 to 1.5 mil) and spend that money up front instead, especially if you can turn Korpi into another asset.

I just don't think it's worth the risk of the new backup not working out here. If Korpisalo keeps consistent at around .911 SP and is able to spell Swayman when he's not playing well, he's worth the money spent.
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,109
11,298
NWO
The hope is you get lucky with a league minimum signing (like Heinen) but you're probably more likely to end up with a dud (like Jones, Tufte) in net.

Take away Korpisalo's 4 wins and the Bruins are in last overall in the league. They're done. Even if they win their next 4 they'd be out of the playoff picture on Thanksgiving and that usually means no playoffs. (No playoffs means no playoff revenue.)

Is there a $2m forward ($1m for the backup, $2m forward = Korpi's $3m) they could have signed that would be such a difference maker that he'd give them 4 more wins in their first 20 games?
I mean that's one way to look at it, but I see it as if they have 6 mil in cap space with Korpi, moving on from him could get you an 8 mil forward. That could be a big difference in talent and a difference maker for this team...plus again maybe you also can get an extra pick out of it in addition to that cap space.
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
23,637
16,025
Southwestern Ontario
Love the corpse!
 

Attachments

  • 1732298803482.png
    1732298803482.png
    140.7 KB · Views: 1

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,109
11,298
NWO
I just don't think it's worth the risk of the new backup not working out here. If Korpisalo keeps consistent at around .911 SP and is able to spell Swayman when he's not playing well, he's worth the money spent.
They literally just took that risk with a 3mil backup in Korpi who was struggling and it paid off. I trust their talent evaluation in net at this point where I'd have no issue with them grabbing another guy making less, IF korpi can bring back some assets after the season
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,352
22,233
Maine
They literally just took that risk with a 3mil backup in Korpi who was struggling and it paid off. I trust their talent evaluation in net at this point where I'd have no issue with them grabbing another guy making less, IF korpi can bring back some assets after the season

They took that risk because they had to - both Ullmark and Swayman wanted to be the #1 and play over 50 games and Swayman was due for a new contract. I don't see that same sort of need to get rid of Korpisalo if he continues to play well.
 

Mad-Marcus

Registered User
Apr 26, 2002
1,342
1,720
Seacoast, NH
Korpisalo has obviously found his game (thanks Goalie Bob) and proving all the naysayers that he is a quality NHL goalie. Top 5, no, but as multiple teams have proved, EDM, VGK, you need a goalie that can make the important saves if not necessarily every save.
Korpi plays a lot like Ullmark and is a wall down low. I hope Swayman's ego allows him to recover and not brood, but Korpi's the better goalie right now. It only will help us if they push each other.
Swayman has shown nothing if not a great supportive teammate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,109
11,298
NWO
They took that risk because they had to - both Ullmark and Swayman wanted to be the #1 and play over 50 games and Swayman was due for a new contract. I don't see that same sort of need to get rid of Korpisalo if he continues to play well.
It's not necessarily a need and don't get me wrong I'm fine keeping him if he continues his play, I just think they have other holes to fill
 

The don godfather

Registered User
Jul 5, 2018
20,458
21,801
Woodbridge Ontario
Many here had the pitchforks when Don did this trade I hear silence now. I was quite pleased with the deal especially getting that 1st round pick. Korpi and kastelic is the cake of this deal very sweet.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241122-185109_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241122-185109_Chrome.jpg
    125.3 KB · Views: 1

Ladyfan

Sad times in the USA
Sponsor
Jun 8, 2007
65,166
83,541
next to the bench
Dude looked so bad to start here and lived up to all of the negative hype about him. Ever since he's been on such an upward trajectory where he is visibly getting better at the things he was bad at (puck tracking being the big one). You love to see it. Goalie Bob really is incredible.
A bit of confidence goes a long way with players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldenblack and CDJ

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,985
28,204
Medfield, MA
For me it's simple. You play the guy who is playing best the most. Contracts shouldn't matter. That goes for the whole roster. The better you perform the more ice time you get. Anything else is stupid.

Right now Swayman is #2, until he plays up to being #1 again or until Korpi drops off (which he hopefully won't).
I agree. And honestly, I think it would motivate Swayman more than force feeding him starts he hasn't earned.
 

goldenblack

Registered User
Apr 15, 2024
1,175
2,789
Boston loves a comeback story. You'll see the guys play HARD for Korpi. NO question. And it's great to see Korpi play hard for himself. 4M a year (3M for us) to thrive here is a really nice life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gee Wally

Kalus

Registered User
Sep 27, 2003
2,103
1,454
Florida
The hope is you get lucky with a league minimum signing (like Heinen) but you're probably more likely to end up with a dud (like Jones, Tufte) in net.

Take away Korpisalo's 4 wins and the Bruins are in last overall in the league. They're done. Even if they win their next 4 they'd be out of the playoff picture on Thanksgiving and that usually means no playoffs. (No playoffs means no playoff revenue.)

Is there a $2m forward ($1m for the backup, $2m forward = Korpi's $3m) they could have signed that would be such a difference maker that he'd give them 4 more wins in their first 20 games?
I don’t think it is as much about using the $2M backup goalie differential on a $2M F, it’s about using the $2M backup goalie differential plus the $3 or $4M 3rd pair dman differential (they are allocating $8.25M of cap there) and using that for a better F.

All the overpays added together add up. And then the other point not to be missed is the term. Korpi has played well overall these 8 games, credit to him, but will he keep it up for the rest of this year and 3 more as he ages into his mid 30s? His career average .900 says otherwise. Still a poor acquisition from a cap perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDiesel

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,109
11,298
NWO
I don’t think it is as much about using the $2M backup goalie differential on a $2M F, it’s about using the $2M backup goalie differential plus the $3 or $4M 3rd pair dman differential (they are allocating $8.25M of cap there) and using that for a better F.

All the overpays added together add up. And then the other point not to be missed is the term. Korpi has played well overall these 8 games, credit to him, but will he keep it up for the rest of this year and 3 more as he ages into his mid 30s? His career average .900 says otherwise. Still a poor acquisition from a cap perspective.
Exactly. Which is why I'm saying if he continues it all season you try and get an asset + some cap space for him. No guarantee he continues this play next year let alone 3 more, so sell high for once.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad