He's also just kind of the least interesting type of prospect to talk about.
Like with the Podkolzin example, there's plenty to talk about around his size, is he going to be a power forward? Will he develop the scoring touch in the NHL? Does he bring enough to find a home in the show if the offence doesn't pan out? etc.
With basically any type of a defenseman, there's all sorts of stuff to talk about: Will the offensive game translate? Is he good enough in his own end to make it? Does he exhibit the puck skills to keep moving up levels? Do we really want to have the "he's a great #5/6 in the WHL so he'll be a great #5/6 in the NHL" argument again (yes. The answer is always yes, we want to have that argument again. What did we do to deserve this? I don't know, but I know the answer will be yes.)? And on, and on.
With an undersized scoring winger it's basically just he either does the thing or he doesn't do the thing. If he's doing the thing, then it's "okay, good. He's doing the thing. Hopefully the thing keeps being done as he moves up. I can't wait for him to do the thing in the NHL." If he's not doing the thing, it's "okay darn, he's not doing the thing. I hope he's able to start doing the thing again soon."
This isn't any type of a slight on Lekkerimaki, but just that as a type of player he's kind of the most straightforward, conversation-wise.