arttk
Registered User
Yeah, because Guentzel is a better player and has a better track record and it’s not even close.MB 29. Point still stands.
Yeah, because Guentzel is a better player and has a better track record and it’s not even close.MB 29. Point still stands.
Not all top line wingers are the same though, Boeser is good, but Guentzel is better…if you can get Guentzel for free and get some prime assets for Boeser, why wouldn’t you? Plus, this isn’t a “must trade Boeser at all costs”, its more of a gauge the value of Boeser because you’re going to have to pony up for him after next year and that might not be palatable, so it might be better to move on early at his highest value.MB 29. Point still stands.
Because the team is lacking a top 6 RW and replacing a RW with a LW is just addition with subtraction. You'd still have to replace Boeser in the top 6. You'd also be paying Guentzel at UFA prices, so he won't come cheap. That's IF they can even sign him.Not all top line wingers are the same though, Boeser is good, but Guentzel is better…if you can get Guentzel for free and get some prime assets for Boeser, why wouldn’t you? Plus, this isn’t a “must trade Boeser at all costs”, its more of a gauge the value of Boeser because you’re going to have to pony up for him after next year and that might not be palatable, so it might be better to move on early at his highest value.
Disagree…they should at least be exploring a Boeser trade in the off season.Because the team is lacking a top 6 RW and replacing a RW with a LW is just addition with subtraction. You'd still have to replace Boeser in the top 6. You'd also be paying Guentzel at UFA prices, so he won't come cheap. That's IF they can even sign him.
Because the team is lacking a top 6 RW and replacing a RW with a LW is just addition with subtraction. You'd still have to replace Boeser in the top 6. You'd also be paying Guentzel at UFA prices, so he won't come cheap. That's IF they can even sign him.
He will be 30 when he start his new contract next year. Boeser is about two and half years younger. Signing Guentzel to a 6 or 7 year contracts takes him to 36 or 37 which is not ideal tbh. The only free agents I would personally sign long term are ones that are younger like Hanifin and Forsling who would have been 27 and 28 when there new contracts kick in.Uhh Guentzel is 29..
Nopes. Most wingers really cant.Guentzel plays both sides. Most wingers can
Man I wish we could draft someone like Forsling...He will be 30 when he start his new contract next year. Boeser is about two and half years younger. Signing Guentzel to a 6 or 7 year contracts takes him to 36 or 37 which is not ideal tbh. The only free agents I would personally sign long term are ones that are younger like Hanifin and Forsling who would have been 27 and 28 when there new contracts kick in.
Well. We just cant.Man I wish we could draft someone like Forsling...
Nopes. Most wingers really cant.
It creates all kinds of weirdness on zone exits for an example.
Wouldn't be surprised for him to get at least his 9 games next season in the NHL.
The '9 games' is only a thing for 18 and 19 year old CHL players. Lekkerimaki will be neither.
Whether he gets games *this* year is the big question.
Educate me. Would that burn a year of his ELC?The '9 games' is only a thing for 18 and 19 year old CHL players. Lekkerimaki will be neither.
Whether he gets games *this* year is the big question.
Given the struggles of our power play, you have to think there is a chance we see Lekkerimaki. Not sure if it’s significant, but if the power play continues to struggle, he may be able to take a difference and would otherwise be sheltered at 5 on 5 play.
The '9 games' is only a thing for 18 and 19 year old CHL players. Lekkerimaki will be neither.
Whether he gets games *this* year is the big question.
Educate me. Would that burn a year of his ELC?
ELC slide rules affect everyone, not just CHL players. He’ll be too old for it to matter next year, but if he does get games this year, he shouldn’t get more than 9
If they put him in the NHL this year I believe so, yes. Same as adding Boeser at the end of the 16-17 season at the same age.
The '9 games' thing really only happens generally with CHL players and maybe the odd rare Euro.
I’m not sure it matters. Section 9.1(d) provides as follows:Educate me. Would that burn a year of his ELC?
At the start of the year, yes. It’s a euro/college thing at the end of the year. If he gets 10 games this year, he’d burn a year of his ELC
True. Although Pettersson played a full season in the NHL in his D2 and was a similar size I think.If he was the exact same player in the NCAA he would 100% be joining the NHL team. It's just that there are more options because he's already signed and coming from Europe.
We've looked much more dynamic offensively in the last couple games after really scuffling to score goals for a month, which might change things a bit.
My main concern would be throwing a skinny kid who already had a concussion last year into heavy playoff-style games to close out the season.
I though Pods came before the deadline?Given that the team is limited to four call-ups between the TDL and the end of the season—and Podkolzin has already been one—and that Silovs might be another call-up if Demko is banged up. I would be shocked if they use one of those last two call-ups on Lekkerimaki.