I think if you want to compare Nylander and Lekk at the same age, it would be Lekk's D2 vs Nylander's D1. Nylander also was not the top scorer on his SHL team (even though he didn't play the full season) while Lekk was the top scorer for Orebro. Their performance in the U20 was very similar but Lekk got the MVP. I think just look at that they are very comparable. Of course Nyalnder did well once he hit the AHL so we'll see soon enough if Lekk has that in him.
I think his PP skill is his most transferrable skills. He probably has the best shot on the team and just having that would makes him a good PP1 weapon.
I agree he is 100% not on the same level as Petey, Carlsson. I think he is probably closer to Raymond's level and for now, stats wise he is not that far off of Nylander at a similar age.
Why would I compare Lekk's D+2 to Nylander's D+1? That's dumb. It's not the same age. Nylander was a superior player in the SHL a year earlier in his development. In the same season he was a top AHL player. In his D+2 Nylander dominated the AHL and then became a top-six NHLer for good.
Your criticism of Nylander "not leading his team in scoring" in the SHL is also incredibly disingenuous. The top scorer on his MODO team had 25 points. Nylander had 20 points in
21 games. That was a very low scoring team and Nylander was very clearly the best player. If he stays the full season he leads the team in scoring by a mile.
They are not comparable as prospects. Nylander post draft seasons were unquestionably superior. Your arguments regarding their post-draft development really do not hold any water.
Part of my evaluation of Lekk, as I said already, is that he is too PP reliant. Being a PP weapon does not hold that much value to me. Daniel Sprong is a PP weapon. He's still a journeyman NHLer.