Accidents... which by definition... are not done on purpose, don't happen on roads?
This is an awful tragedy, and completely avoidable. This situation was not an "accident" in any way.
But this post is absolute nonsense. Sure, some accidents happen because of things you said. A LOT of accidents happen for many other reasons outside of someone's choices and recklessness.
Look up the definition of accident:
1. an unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury.
2. an event that happens by chance or that is without apparent or deliberate cause.
Car blows a tire and swerves into another car... accident.
This is the only one that might actually be an accident, assuming the person was not negligent in car maintenance. Like I posted elsewhere, these account for 3-4% of accident in Canada.
Car hits a patch of black ice and slides into a concrete wall or another car... accident.
Not an accident. The driver did not drive to the conditions. Error in judgement? Sure. But there's nothing unexpected or "without cause" about black ice when it's below freezing outside.
I remember failing my first written driving test when i was 16 because of this multiple choice question. "If you drive at 60kph on a road with a 60kph speed limit, and you hit ice causing you to blow a stop sign, what was the cause?" I said it was because of the ice. But that was the wrong answer. The correct answer was "Did not drive to the conditions". That question has stuck with me 20+ years later.
I've had it happen more times than I can count where I've checked my blind spot and it's clear, so I've gone to change lanes on like a highway/tollway/interstate, and someone else changes lanes from the far right lane into the same middle lane I'm trying to change into, and we almost get in an accident. I've seen this happen where the cars do actually get into an accident on account of it.
How does this end up in a crash? If someone enters lane you are trying to merge into, you can go back into the lane you were originally in. If a crash happens, someone did something wrong. Again, nothing about this is an accident. Someone took a wrong action. Error in judgement. The word accident implies there was nothing anyone could do about it.
Car has to swerve to miss an animal that runs out, hits another car... accident. None of these things are on account of recklessness. They're... by definition... accidents.
Unless it's a moose, you're never supposed swerve unless you're 100% sure you won't hit another car. Again. Error in judgement. Not an accident. Also, were you scanning the sides of the road for animals? Why not?
Plenty of accidents happen involving people driving in a "safe and responsible manner."
Maybe you should clarify your post by saying something like "Drunk driving accidents aren't "accidents."
Obviously, driving drunk is nowhere near the same as the examples you cited.
When driving, 100% of your attention should be on doing every little thing right to prevent crashes from happening. Doing so would
Obviously, in the real world, it doesn't work like that. It a big sliding scale. On a good day, driving only occupies 90% of our attention and mistakes or lapses in judgement can happen. Too many people are closer to 40%. By calling crashes "accidents", absolves us from to trying to be as close as possible to that 100%. Almost all accidents are caused by someone making a wrong decision. Often, they are forgivable very minor lapses in judgement, but often, they are also bigger less forgivable lapses. We need to stop normalizing this behaviour and treat driving like the serious activity it is. Cutting out the word "accident" is a first step towards that.