Chuck Norris Trophy
Registered User
- Jan 22, 2015
- 2,972
- 3,218
their sister was getting married TODAY too? wow the more I find out about this the more sick I feel.Scum
Ah, sorry, my bad. It’s hard to interpret tone through text.I don't actually believe this.
No, and that's a ridiculous take that's bordering on trolling, and you know it.So if a girl gets raped, do you get to say "Well, she should know that wearing a short skirt might invite some people to do this".
You're still victim blaming. All these things can be true. The "advice" you're giving can be true, but that advice is still victim blaming.
Why don’t you just pass on your condolences and leave it at that. This commentary is unnecessary and in poor taste.But we HAVE created a dangerous environment for rural cycling. That’s an inescapable reality.
Also, the term “victim blaming” has a real meaning which is not at all applicable here. Everyone in the room understands that cyclists have the right to those roads. Simply having the right doesn’t mean it’s safe, which is why cyclists are hit on rural roads all the time.
You are correct in that murder is frequently broken into 2 categories with 1st degree being premeditated and 2nd degree being without planning. The problem being is murder is intentional and as you said requires malice. Nothing we've heard about this incident indicates that this person intentionally killed them so this absolutely does not qualify as 2nd degree murder. Your last paragraph lays out exactly why this is a textbook case of manslaughter.1st degree murder is premeditated
2nd degree is in the heat of the moment. This absolutely qualifies.
Where you see DUIs resulting in death being charged as manslaughter is because murder requires malice and most courts rule that getting behind a wheel knowingly drunk doesnt constitute malice, just negligence
And if an architect designs a bad house that collapses and kills 1000 people, we should execute his entire city, right?Should be the death penalty.
Drinking while driving and causing someone else to lose their life should automatically have you forfeit yours.
You concluded all of that from that video did yaSo apparently this scumbag drunk driver’s biggest concern wasn’t the fact that he’d just ended the lives of two people (and ruined the lives of countless others), but rather that he’d have to remain in custody until at least next Thursday … as if he was the real victim in all of this. This dude is a sociopath and he doesn’t deserve to live amongst normal people.
Cars shouldn't be driving in the shoulder lane.I don't think it is that so much as the larger question of whether or not bicycles should/can share the same spaces. Sometimes it is yes. Sometimes it is is no.
There is a nuance that bike enthusiasts don't want to acknowledge.
From the testimony gathered at the scene, it was purely aggressive reaction to a perceived slight against him. He came up fast on two cars traveling in front of him, moved to the oncoming lane to pass the back car, where the front car then also moved into the oncoming lane to give the bikers room, Higgins thought this was an attempt to block him from passing, so he quickly veered back into the correct lane where the bikers were, striking them.
You are correct in that murder is frequently broken into 2 categories with 1st degree being premeditated and 2nd degree being without planning. The problem being is murder is intentional and as you said requires malice. Nothing we've heard about this incident indicates that this person intentionally killed them so this absolutely does not qualify as 2nd degree murder. Your last paragraph lays out exactly why this is a textbook case of manslaughter.
Should be off the roads permanently. And hopefully he'll rot in prison long enough for that to be the case.
You concluded all of that from that video did ya
From the testimony gathered at the scene, it was purely aggressive reaction to a perceived slight against him. He came up fast on two cars traveling in front of him, moved to the oncoming lane to pass the back car, where the front car then also moved into the oncoming lane to give the bikers room, Higgins thought this was an attempt to block him from passing, so he quickly veered back into the correct lane where the bikers were, striking them.
I both hope and believe that these are factors which will ultimately influence the sentence handed down.Reminds me of the Stephanie Melgoza case where she ran down two pedestrians and was upset that she would be missing her class the next day and that they wouldn’t give her cellphone back to her, didn’t care at all that she had killed two people
Thing is, that road has tractor signs everywhere and it's farmland. Anyone familiar with that usually knows moving to the left a little means a tractor is ahead, even at dusk. Two cars or more moving over means you should do the same. But he was a drunk asshole who was selfish, so common sense went out the window.
What else is there to conclude? Any normal person wouldn’t give a shit about having to stay in custody for another week. They’d be too focused on the fact that they just killed two people.You concluded all of that from that video did ya
Cars shouldn't be driving in the shoulder lane.
For some unknown reason the sober participants in this tragedy refused to run over one another.Is it that simple though? There's less visibility for drivers and cyclists at night never mind the drinking and driving aspect of it.
There's always some level of caution needed when partaking in certain activities considering elements that could impact your safety and enjoyment of those activities.