AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 11,452
- 33,467
3C behind Aho and Trocheck. And honestly I’d prefer Staal at 3C. I’d have no interest in adding Tavares to this team.
Teams Tavares would not be a 1C on:
Boston
Florida
Tampa
Toronto
Carolina
NYR
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington
Colorado
Edmonton
Vancouver
People said you don't put Kessel on the 3rd line too... Then HBK won the cup in 2016.I think sometimes people are too focused on depth chart rather than how lines would realistically sort out. You don’t put Tavares on the 3rd line. If he’s in Edmonton, say, either McDrai are put together and he centres the 2nd or he plays with one of them.
Career obviously Tavares destroys PLD, but for the same reason that Thornton didn’t bump Tavares down when he was there it’s not all about career numbers for who you’d have now. PLD has shown great chemistry so far, and is on the upswing clearly. Tavares while still a good player, who knows what chemistry he would have and is on the decline slowly. But these are the types of comments I’d expect though.1st on a majority of teams in the league regardless of poll outcome.
PLD doesn't hold a candle to JT. Guys been above 50pts once in his career. These are the type of responses i'd expect though.
Right so we are in agreement.I wouldn't have him slated in front of Zibenejad.
I would have him as 2C on their depth chart.
lol @ all the votes for 3C. Ok, HFBoards.
There are a few teams, but even then, he'd be in the top 6. He or someone else would be on the wing. But despite that, the voting is hilarious. Sure, there are a few teams he'd technically be the 3C on. Maybe all those fans voted. It is possible.
lol @ all the votes for 3C. Ok, HFBoards.
There are a few teams, but even then, he'd be in the top 6. He or someone else would be on the wing. But despite that, the voting is hilarious. Sure, there are a few teams he'd technically be the 3C on. Maybe all those fans voted. It is possible.
I agree, he’d be in the top 6 on probably every team in one way or another but that’s not really reflected in the poll options. There is quite a few teams who have 2 equal or better Cs right now that have chemistry with the teams players and system so if Tavares was added right now would most likely not supplant the current top 2 Cs. Would the team tinker to try to find something that works with JT in the top 6? Of course. But then this is assuming that they actively went to acquire him, and brings on many other questions. I get what you’re saying but I feel you’re making it more complicated than the questionlol @ all the votes for 3C. Ok, HFBoards.
There are a few teams, but even then, he'd be in the top 6. He or someone else would be on the wing. But despite that, the voting is hilarious. Sure, there are a few teams he'd technically be the 3C on. Maybe all those fans voted. It is possible.
People said you don't put Kessel on the 3rd line too... Then HBK won the cup in 2016.
Tavares would be 1st or 2nd on most teams. But Pittsburgh is an exception with Crosby and Malkin (when healthy).
But as often as one of them is hurt we all know Tavares would be 2nd line most times for Pittsburgh.
You’re comparing a 1C Tavares to 40 year old Joe Thornton? This is classic Jets fans. Compare last season where PLD was pacing for 40 points.Career obviously Tavares destroys PLD, but for the same reason that Thornton didn’t bump Tavares down when he was there it’s not all about career numbers for who you’d have now. PLD has shown great chemistry so far, and is on the upswing clearly. Tavares while still a good player, who knows what chemistry he would have and is on the decline slowly. But these are the types of comments I’d expect though.
You’re comparing a 1C Tavares to 40 year old Joe Thornton? This is classic Jets fans. Compare last season where PLD was pacing for 40 points.
Who knows what kind of chemistry Ovechkin would have with Matthews so for that reason Bunting would retain his spot.
I’m not the one making that comparison. You’re the one saying career numbers define who is better now. Yes Dubois had low numbers last year. Have you paid any attention as to why that may be? I also said he’s trending up which he is. Classic jets fan? So you’re not here to have a conversation but rather just push your opinion. I don’t see the point in carrying on with an attempted conversation then.You’re comparing a 1C Tavares to 40 year old Joe Thornton? This is classic Jets fans. Compare last season where PLD was pacing for 40 points.
Who knows what kind of chemistry Ovechkin would have with Matthews so for that reason Bunting would retain his spot.
well, it's on rare occasions when Backstrom is fully healthy and Kuzy is playing lights out at the same time (when this happens we are the cup favorites). So on these rare occasions, he's 3C, but in reality he's 2C or even 1C in most likely scenarios.Yeah, no thanks. Backstrom hasn't played this season, but over the last 2 seasons they both have a 0.92 PPG. Backstrom is way better defensively. Also, Backstrom is covering for OV which I doubt Tavares can do since he can't skate which is why Marner has been doing the heavy lifting for him for years. Kuznetsov is playing way better than Tavares right now.