No, it's not the pure hyperbole you turn to when you're shown to be wrong. Our players are not perfect. No player is. Our team is not perfect. No team is. Our players have room to grow. All players do. But we're not talking about them growing as hockey players. We're talking about them conforming to your personal, unrealistic preference of conduct in between play.
The big takeaway is that we had a dominant game that should make everybody happy, where we beat them in the underlying metrics as our bottom six woke up, we beat them on the scoreboard as our captain styled on them, and we beat them in the scrums as our player football tackled a guy to the ice. And yet our post-game thread is full of people complaining that the reigning Hart trophy winner - who not only got a goal and an assist, but did stand up for himself and cross check back - only did X and Y but not Z and you wanted to see Z in some meaningless scrum in a meaningless, already decided, early-season game where our players rushed in specifically to make sure Matthews wouldn't have to fight.
Maybe, just once, we could not desperately search for the next meaningless thing to be upset about, and just enjoy a good win.