- Jan 22, 2007
- 14,826
- 8,154
I think getting a full 60 or so games of Tavares as captain to me makes me feel that Morgan Rielly is truly the one who deserved and deserves the C. He may not be super emotional either, or super physical, and is having a bad year...but he is far more competitive and I imagine vocal in the dressing room...and when you hear his responses to the media, while...still guarded and professional he comes across as way less cliche. Like, Tavares postgame media yesterday was like...he has no idea what to do.
Rielly or Matthews 100% should have been named captain. The Leafs had one of the best, young, up-and-coming teams in the NHL and they decided to become obsessed with John Tavares and made their own kids take a back seat--paying him huge money then making it "his team." The Leafs should have given the C to one of their homegrown players who was there longer than a season. Honestly, what has John Tavares accomplished as a player that warranted him becoming "the franchise" overnight? He never won squat with the Isles--they were mostly a losing team. He has zero championships and hardly any playoff experience. He hasn't won Art Rosses, Harts or Selkes. The Leafs somehow made Tavares out to be prime Crosby, Toews or Getzlaf... I never understood that. You are right--Rielly would have been a much better choice as captain--at least it would send a message that this team still belongs to the young, homegrown core. Instead everything turned into the "Tavares show."