dackelljuneaubulis02
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2012
- 12,204
- 8,082
Im starting to think the actual problem is that most people on this board live in a bubble and are not exposed to other 96% of the NHL. It is baffling me how ill informed a lot of people are, I thought its pretty obvious that Lekhonen and Armia are nowhere near top 6 talent, but here we are. Then theres those dude that are telling me that Danault is as good as Tavares, Backstrom, Bergeron, Barzal, Mackinnon and the likes.
Im just trying to pierce the bubble.
Putting Lehkonen and Armia on the same level was your first problem.
Armia's doing very well. Using him as an example just doesn't really work the way you want it. Lehkonen? Absolutely.
Yes your satire needs work when trying to combat these narratives. Trying to convince people that Armia and Danault are 'nowhere near' top 6 talent is just kind of pointless. They're pretty close at worst. They're not 'nowhere near' lol. Come on, man. I get it you're trying to raise people's standards of evaluating talent but you don't do it with your level of hyperbole.