So what you are telling me is that he was carried by 2 better players
You do realize Pitlick was a better player than him last season...
Players drafted in the top10 are somewhat changing your team. They carry it. Jimmy showed he can't do that
The Snuggy Bear slander will not be tolerated. If I’m Ottawa, I consider this. Snuggerud would be a perfect fit with Tkachuk & Stutzle
Snuggy straight up for #13...and Blues keep #16? Tempting, but i'd probably pass unless one of the top-tier D-men fell.Wild #13 for Snuggered
Almost certainly, yes.Is Buch available?
Snuggy & #16 for #9 seems a bit light going to STL; especially if Ottawa and Montreal would move their picks. But if Yakemchuk/Dickinson/Buium/Silayev are still on the board; I'd probably bite.I would do this, not sure about other Flames fans, but I always liked Snuggerud
Exactly who I was thinking of with this proposal. Couldn't see STL getting into the top-4, but 5-8 seemed reasonable.I'd do it if I was Habs brass for 5
Another Habs fan on board. I wouldn't hate a move up into the top-5, especially is Silayev falls a bit.I can’t help but actually consider this as a Montreal fan. Snuggerud is the kind of profile we need. And a 16th could allow us to still get a solid prospect or
Package it with the 26th for an established top 6. The Habs turnaround will be fast insuspect
Blues keep #16, and gain a young LHD plus #11? Interesting...Buffalo #11 + Ryan Johnson for Snuggerud
23 and 16 isnt getting you to top 10. Why would snuggarud? He has not moved up his draft spot.Blues need a top D prospect. I'd love to see them move up enough to grab a Dickinson, Silayev, Levshunov, Buium or Yakemchuk which would probably require a top-8 or top-9 pick. I may be in the minority of Blues fans, but all of the Blues top prospects are forwards. I'd be willing to dangle Jimmy Snuggerud and the Blues 1st pick to move into the top-10.
Would any team with a pick between 4 and 10 be willing to make a move back in exchange for Snuggerud's bomb of a shot and a later pick?
That’s fair as I would agree it’s better to use how GMs actually value the picks vs what they’re actually worth (but of course opens up an opportunity gap for a savvy GM to take advantage of).It's from soundofhockey.com. the chart you are using from the athletic was created with the intent of the value that has been gained from these draft pick positions over time. It attempts to show what picks theoretically should be worth. The chart I'm using aggregates trades that have historically been made by GMS. What GM's have actually valued the picsks at in the past. Whether they should be valued like that or not, I prefer using a chart based on historical trades. Although I do like Dom's model and I think it shows that picks in the range you are offering (48, 56) are often undervalued by GM's). They are often traded for pretty much anything at the trade deadline.
That chart might be good analytically, but I don't see it applicable in the real world.What draft pick value chart are you using? The one from the Athletic would suggest picks 16 and 48 would be worth about pick 9.
Of course, each draft and each situation is different. Depends on the level of desperation and who it is trying to talk the other side into the deal.
That chart might be good analytically, but I don't see it applicable in the real world.
In that chart picks 31 and 62 would be enough to ove up 11 spots in the 1st.
Nemec was 2 OA. Youd have to add a lot moreIt better be a Nemec coming back if we're trading #16 and Snuggerud. Otherwise there's a very good chance the player that is taken is hated by the fanbase because we traded a young top 6 forward and another young NHL player.
There's way too many outcomes where something like this turn out terribly bad, and not many where the result turns out good for the Blues, disregarding the other teams outcome.
WTF....buffalo does not nerd snuggeruf let alone the value is outrageousBuffalo #11 + Ryan Johnson for Snuggerud
That’s fair as I would agree it’s better to use how GMs actually value the picks vs what they’re actually worth (but of course opens up an opportunity gap for a savvy GM to take advantage of).
I assume this is the chart you’re referring to:
It still suggests picks 16 and 48 are worth the 11th overall…but of course, Buffalo could easily say no thank you and hang up the phone.
With this draft being pretty wide open and different teams bound to value these guys quite differently, I bet we see more movement of picks this year than last.
Then again, the number of 1sts that moved on draft day last year was 0 so it’s not going to take much to beat 0.
Nemec was 2 OA. Youd have to add a lot more
WTF....buffalo does not nerd snuggeruf let alone the value is outrageous
So what you are telling me is that he was carried by 2 better players
You do realize Pitlick was a better player than him last season...
Players drafted in the top10 are somewhat changing your team. They carry it. Jimmy showed he can't do that
I hope we see picks move. It's more funThat’s fair as I would agree it’s better to use how GMs actually value the picks vs what they’re actually worth (but of course opens up an opportunity gap for a savvy GM to take advantage of).
I assume this is the chart you’re referring to:
It still suggests picks 16 and 48 are worth the 11th overall…but of course, Buffalo could easily say no thank you and hang up the phone.
With this draft being pretty wide open and different teams bound to value these guys quite differently, I bet we see more movement of picks this year than last.
Then again, the number of 1sts that moved on draft day last year was 0 so it’s not going to take much to beat 0.
By reading this drivel, you too can lower your IQ.So what you are telling me is that he was carried by 2 better players
You do realize Pitlick was a better player than him last season...
Players drafted in the top10 are somewhat changing your team. They carry it. Jimmy showed he can't do that
Nemec? For Snuggerud and #16? Oof.It better be a Nemec coming back if we're trading #16 and Snuggerud. Otherwise there's a very good chance the player that is taken is hated by the fanbase because we traded a young top 6 forward and another young NHL player.
There's way too many outcomes where something like this turn out terribly bad, and not many where the result turns out good for the Blues, disregarding the other teams outcome.
Oof? Is that a Synonym for steal of the century because if it is, then I think you guys are close to agreement:Nemec? For Snuggerud and #16? Oof.
Nemec? For Snuggerud and #16? Oof.
#10, Holtz for #16, Buchnevich
Buffalo #11 + Ryan Johnson for Snuggerud
He likely ends up going for a very late 1st and some change at the deadlineNo.. We will keep both thanks,