bobbythebrain
Registered User
- Jul 30, 2016
- 14,365
- 14,365
And your education system seems to be top notch. Enviable reading comprehension and debate skills.
You compared Jesse to Gretzky. You're no scholar
And your education system seems to be top notch. Enviable reading comprehension and debate skills.
Lolol
When the Edmonton Journal (/Kurt Leavins) wrote positive articles about Jesse I was often told it can't be taken seriously as they write anything to support what helps the team and the organization. Maybe that should be kept in mind now, too.
Like I've said I wasn't too happy about the Oilers saying publicly they are ready to give up on Puljujarvi last spring. In general it's sometimes hard to understand how different the workers rights sometimes are in NA. I really like Canada, but it's just strange the team could basically do almost anything but the player would need to stay for at least 7-8 years. I guess that's a cultural difference between NA and Europe.
I'll stay out of this (poisonous straight from the title) thread, but have followed what's going on and I'm excited to see how the team will do next year. I like some of the little moves and the Lucic/Neal deal looks very good. I still believe some conditional picks could help to ensure you get a fairer value for Jesse if things click better next season. Good luck guys!
That's a bit tiring. AFAIK every single Finn over here has said (repeatedly in fact) there's also fault in Jesse. On the other hand there's plenty of posters who've never really blamed the organization in this case. I personally think and would like to say know there's fault in both sides. I won't write more about this anymore.
As for the CBA, to me it's extermely strict, no matter how one puts it. Well it's none of my business, but that's what I feel anyway. I understand teams want to own their young players like property, but on the other hand less strict rules would ensure there's more quality players available. Thus it wouldn't be only negative for the teams. The draft picks wouldn't be quite as valuable, but it'd be easier to fix the team by trades.
The advantage of interviewing him in his native language is not overblown. Often times it's not the answer to a question that is enlightening, but how they answer.
Dont forget, youre responsible for screwing up his trade value.
YOU MONSTER!!
When the Edmonton Journal (/Kurt Leavins) wrote positive articles about Jesse I was often told it can't be taken seriously as they write anything to support what helps the team and the organization. Maybe that should be kept in mind now, too.
Like I've said I wasn't too happy about the Oilers saying publicly they are ready to give up on Puljujarvi last spring. In general it's sometimes hard to understand how different the workers rights sometimes are in NA. I really like Canada, but it's just strange the team could basically do almost anything but the player would need to stay for at least 7-8 years. I guess that's a cultural difference between NA and Europe.
I'll stay out of this (poisonous straight from the title) thread, but have followed what's going on and I'm excited to see how the team will do next year. I like some of the little moves and the Lucic/Neal deal looks very good. I still believe some conditional picks could help to ensure you get a fairer value for Jesse if things click better next season. Good luck guys!
It IS easy to fix the team by trades, as long as the two teams agree on the trade.That's a bit tiring. AFAIK every single Finn over here has said (repeatedly in fact) there's also fault in Jesse. On the other hand there's plenty of posters who've never really blamed the organization in this case. I personally think and would like to say know there's fault in both sides. I won't write more about this anymore.
As for the CBA, to me it's extermely strict, no matter how one puts it. Well it's none of my business, but that's what I feel anyway. I understand teams want to own their young players like property, but on the other hand less strict rules would ensure there's more quality players available. Thus it wouldn't be only negative for the teams. The draft picks wouldn't be quite as valuable, but it'd be easier to fix the team by trades.
You and I have exchanged posts on Jesse's failure to become an NHL player a few times and its often puzzled me why you think that there is much less culpability for Jesse than there is for the Oilers.
I am really curious to hear...why is that the case?
I can't subscribe to the bolded at all and mainly because its revisionist thought.
Literally everybody at the time was saying that Hitch was showing faith in Pulju, giving him a fresh chance, fresh start, and with prospects the constant line of thought has usually been give them chances, several, in the show, to experience it, grow into the NHL game, gain their confidence here etc. Virtually nothing was served in having this 4th pick player toil in the AHL.
The trouble with what you are saying on this is it subscribes to the can't win line of thinking. If the Oilers fail to bring up Pulju they are burying him in the minors. If they bring up Pulju its far too early, he's not ready yada yada. I blame this org for things all day but this one is on Pulju, and its up to him to deal with the several chances given.
I'll chime in: a professional organization full of people who have been in the industry for decades are supposed to be more mature and make better decisions than a foreign teenager who probably has a learning disability.You and I have exchanged posts on Jesse's failure to become an NHL player a few times and its often puzzled me why you think that there is much less culpability for Jesse than there is for the Oilers.
I am really curious to hear...why is that the case?
I'll chime in: a professional organization full of people who have been in the industry for decades are supposed to be more mature and make better decisions than a foreign teenager who probably has a learning disability.
Like clockwork. I've said again and again that there's also fault in Puljujarvi. I admit I've gone to details only rarely and maybe too rarely, but I've done it at least a few times anyway. No-one is perfect and that applies to myself, too, but the ones who almost never see anything wrong in the organization shouldn't be the ones blaming me for seeing things from only one side.
At least I haven't tried to affect others' opinions and comments for ages, but when I write here (once in several weeks lately) I get posts that make me feel unwelcome. Puljujarvi's been called an idiot, lazy, stubborn and all kinds of things over here and some of that rage and hatred spills over posters like myself. I mean look at the name of this thread, it's even funny it's come to this. I actually came here to find out how to delete my account and thought I'd write once more.
The fact is I don't know exactly what's going on. What I know is Puljujarvi hasn't played as well as I hoped at times and when he's done I haven't always been happy with the reward or lack of it. Whether it's being immature or lack of development, but of course he could've done his part better.
But I am not suprised it's come to this as I thought McLellan did just the right things to hurt his development. I feel McLellan made Pulju a kind of a scapegoat in the team and Puljujarvi has trouble in breaking away from that even when McLellan is gone. I honestly hoped things would've gone differently, but at the same time I have my reasons to believe Puljujarvi has pretty strong reasons to ask for a change of scenary.
You and I have exchanged posts on Jesse's failure to become an NHL player a few times and its often puzzled me why you think that there is much less culpability for Jesse than there is for the Oilers.
I am really curious to hear...why is that the case?
I’m going with some people take ownership of themselves and some blame everything but themselves. Kinda like making excuses for failure.I'll chime in: a professional organization full of people who have been in the industry for decades are supposed to be more mature and make better decisions than a foreign teenager who probably has a learning disability.
You of all people should know better than to apply remembered 'majority opinion' to a specific poster. I wanted Pulju in the AHL before the season started. I was happy when he was finally sent down. I was very skeptical when Hitch said he was going to fix Pulju but hoped for the best. You can look up the posts if you want.
btw this is Edmonton, the place that reportedly nobody wants to come to that is one of the fastest growing cities;
This is Heritage Festival going on right now. An event that flirts with 500k attendees.
View attachment 248207
This is Edmonton Folk Music Festival going on next week;
This is Edmonton Fringe Festival going on the week after;
This is a weekend or daytrip away;
Yeah, what a **** place to live...
I'm simply saying your view, and others falls into a damned if you do scenario painting of the org always being at fault.
its not so simple. Plus if your view is that Pulju, multiple years into his pro career should still be playing most of the time in the AHL then that kind of confirms the players futility doesn't it.
This is a 4th pick forward with NHL size. This is not a player that should need or require a lot of AHL experience. That he does in your view is pretty much agreeing with my previous expressed view that he was over rated to begin with. You were one of the one standing by this pick and yet several NHL players picked lower are FAR BETTER. I was the one arguing that Pulju was over ranked as the NHL was having some kind of love affair with Finnish and Swedish players.
That's great. People who take ownership of themselves tend to succeed where people who blame everyone but themselves fail. When you're inside the situation, attitude is critical. Who is at fault for what circumstances is irrelevant because all you can do, as that person, is your best to surmount them.I’m going with some people take ownership of themselves and some blame everything but themselves. Kinda like making excuses for failure.
Like that learning disability speculation type excuse.