teravaineSAROS
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2015
- 3,882
- 1,587
Jesse Puljujarvi, who has had some similar criticisms about his inability to finish
come again?
Jesse Puljujarvi, who has had some similar criticisms about his inability to finish
come again?
He does have Finnish problems...he was born in Sweden
JP's scoring touch has only been questioned cuz of his comparison to Laine
He does have Finnish problems...he was born in Sweden
JP's scoring touch has only been questioned cuz of his comparison to Laine
Also, as a person whos watched hours of Puljujarvi highlights: can we talk about how good Aho is going to be. Damn dude looks like Backstrom/Giroux out there. He actually upstages Puljujarvi a good amount in his own highlight pack
He is so incredibly shifty and smart and a next level passer.
Aho will be better than Marner.
I can actually see it. I could see him being better than a lot of people tho, including Reinhart, Nylander, Bennett, Strome and even LD. Hes the next big 2nd round steal
Thats how I saw it too. In comparing Laine/matthews to Puljujarvi it was more like "ok they are smart, they are pwfs who can control a game, really good hands BUT Laine is a better finisher" Not that Puljujarvi cant, just not as good as Laine. MPS had legit concerns he could do it at NHL level
If you watch Puljujarvi, he is all over the ice and can score from a variety of ways. Hes no one trick pony (ie skating fast down wing and shooting)
I think his tools are insanely good and match some of the best top picks recently. However I will agree that maybe lack of finish could prevent him from being one of best wingers in the game. Because right now he has elite speed, size, and IQ so if he had Laines shot hed be Kovalchuk 2.0. But even if his finishing isnt Laines level, itll still be Hall level or Eberle level. Good but not elite
I think we can say that in 1 half of a season he's had conserns over scoring, 1st half last season.
But if we look at his stats from the past years.
2012-2013, Jesse 14y.
U16- 12 goals, 20 points in 8 games, playoffs = 15 goals, 24 points in 11 games.
U18- 31 goals, 51 points in 42 games.
2013-14, Jesse 15y.
u16- 5 points in 1 game,
u18- 7 goals, 14 points in 8 games,
u20- 12 goals, 23 points in 18 games, 7 goals in 12 playoff games.
2014- 15, Jesse 16y.
u20- 12 goals, 18 points in 11 games,
Mestis, 2nd best league- 8 goals, 13 points in 15 games,
Liiga- 11 points in 21 games,
u18- 7 points in 7 games.
2015-16,
tough 1st half- 9 points in 31 games?
WJC, 5 goals- 17 points in 7 games,
Liiga- 26 points in the last 29 games,
U18- 5 goals, 7 points in 4 games, and he joined the team mid tourney, had a knee injury, wrist injury, was throwing up 2h before the finals and scored a hattrick.
I think those are alright stats.
Good post. The criticism of his finishing ability isn't backed up by the numbers. Jesse has always shown to be able to score aside from the 1st couple months this past season, over which he received 3rd/4th line minutes (and actually played bottom 6 role for the most part) and was adjusting to Liiga. Since the end of WJC he was back to his form and the production (and goal scoring) spiked accordingly.
And I also believe that he was adjusting to his body too. You could see that during World Juniors he was about the same height as Laine even thought in Liiga page their heights were about three centimetres apart, Laine being taller. I also believe that Jesse put too much pressure on himself when season started: he very well knew where his draft ranking was standing. He wanted to show that he can play against men given that he was penciled in the first line; in a professional league against full grown men, as a 17 year old who was going to play his first full Liiga season, in a team that had won Liiga championship two consecutive years. He also had to learn Marjamäki's style of play which was very D orientated.Good post. The criticism of his finishing ability isn't backed up by the numbers. Jesse has always shown to be able to score aside from the 1st couple months this past season, over which he received 3rd/4th line minutes (and actually played bottom 6 role for the most part) and was adjusting to Liiga. Since the end of WJC he was back to his form and the production (and goal scoring) spiked accordingly.
Good post. The criticism of his finishing ability isn't backed up by the numbers. Jesse has always shown to be able to score aside from the 1st couple months this past season, over which he received 3rd/4th line minutes (and actually played bottom 6 role for the most part) and was adjusting to Liiga. Since the end of WJC he was back to his form and the production (and goal scoring) spiked accordingly.
I think its fair criticism. I mean if he had elite skating, vision, hands, speed AND scoring ability/finishing hed be unquestioned #1. As a top prospect (but not the best) he must have some blemishes in his game. The critique is not that he cant finish, its just that its not as elite as Laine or Matthews (who are elite in that area).
Honest question, have you ever watched a full game he has played?
He is very near Laine in overall ability and the second best prospect in this draft according to me, most people who seen him play alot, this guy Igor https://twitter.com/galkevich32/status/685115126022848512 and Selänne among others thinks they are in their own league.
It really isn´t a slight towards Matthews either since he is a very good player.
What people fail to realize is that that the NHL is about making money, the US market is way bigger than Finland because of population and possibilities to expand the market a lot. An Arizona guy is just so much more intersting for the average american than some finns they just recently heard of which is very understandable.
http://www.torontosun.com/2016/06/25/auston-matthews-a-marketing-bonanza-for-leafs compare this in revenues, jerseys sold vs a guy who hardly speaks english from some small european country.
Toronto mangement are employed by the team owners who wants to maximize profit, they needed a center, the public opinion and media was heavily favouring Matthews and they knew he also has great skill. Easy choice what to do if you want to make sure you keep your job.
If someone wants to say hey, why did Yakupov go first in the draft then? I dont think it´s a pure coincidence many russian players were over-valued at a time when KHL signed some high profile names and became a distant but scary competator to the NHL, also the russian market is way bigger than the finnish.
NHL want to stay as the undisputed top dogs, profit and image goes first, the sport is second among those who handle the big bucks.
That´s not the case for the fans of course who love the beautiful sport of hockey around the world, but of course it´s very hard to get a full outside picture from the inside.
Anyways, have your doubts if you want, the game is played on the ice and the puck favours no one
I think its fair criticism. I mean if he had elite skating, vision, hands, speed AND scoring ability/finishing hed be unquestioned #1. As a top prospect (but not the best) he must have some blemishes in his game. The critique is not that he cant finish, its just that its not as elite as Laine or Matthews (who are elite in that area).
I think we are going to see Puljujarvi get top PP time next year in place of Eberle. Fact of the matter is Pulju can rip one timers better than any other right handed shot we've had in a long time (Stoll)?
Eberle has great hands but his release is so slow that I feel Puljujarvi is going to be placed there instead to add another element to our PP.
That's true Pulju's shot is really good but a bit underrated ( Compared to Laine's shot).
I wouldn't say it's underrated to Laine's. His is just world class
Pulju's shot might be harder than Laine's. It isn't more accurate though.