Context.
Matters also when reading a post.
lol. Let's get into that then, shall we? Let's put some context into of those stats of yours.
JKO scored more than caufield while playing with Byron & Anderson...
"JKO" had 5 goals on 28 shots taken. Which is good for a 17.9% shooting percentage. It's an unsustainable rate by any means, when you consider that he shot for 5.8% during regular season. This is an abnormal stretch, nothing more, nothing less. Just like his 40% SH% was an abnormal stretch in the bubble in 2020. Naturally, we saw his stats reverting back to normal last season, where he scored 5 goals in 56 games. Who would have guessed.
Cole Caufield had 4 goals in 48 shots taken. Good for 8.3%. It's actually under what you expect from an elite shooter.
As for "scored more than Caufield"... He had ONE. More. Goal.
Also funny that you say that playing with Josh Anderson is some kind of an handicap when the guy actually scored as many goals as Kotkaniemi. All of that while actually shooting 50 times on net. Good for 3rd among all of the Montreal Canadiens skaters. Also funny that you ignore the fact that Ducharme was trying to match Danault against the best lines of the opponent, while the opponents tried to match their best defensive line/their top line against Suzuki, depending of the strategy used. But hey. Let's ignore that for "context"'s sake, I guess? Because obviously, quality of competition doesn't matter.
Suzuki's ppg was flat, JKOs increased in the playoffs...
Now, this is clever.
Suzuki, in 2020, had 0.70 points per game played. In 2021, he had 0.73 points per game played. An improvement of 0.03 PPG.
"JKO", in 2020, had 0.40 points per game played. In 2021, he had 0.42 points per game played. An improvement of 0.02 PPG.
If you meant regular season vs playoffs, Suzuki stayed at 0.73 points per game in both cases. "JKO" went from... 0.36 PPG to 0.42 PPG. Wow! A 6% improvement shooting at more than 3 times his regular season efficacy! Now that's a drastic improvement! /s
JKO was 2nd on the team in P/60, behind CC & comfortably ahead of Suzuki.
Wow, now that's one hell of a statistic. Let's dig into the value of those numbers, shall we?
This regular season, Paul Byron had more points per 60 minutes than Kotkaniemi. In the bubble last season, Paul Byron was 2nd in terms of points per 60 minutes.
Man. I guess that using this narrative, Paul Byron is a better offensive player than Kotkaniemi. Man. Put that guy on the 1st line. Why can't the coaches understand that we're depriving ourselves from a superstar in the making?! Because clearly. CONTEXT. MATTERS.
What you did has nothing to do with context. You just brought together a bunch numbers that fit your agenda to build a strawman on how there's nothing wrong with Kotkaniemi's game. Newsflash; There is. Coaches are not ALL stupid. He was scratched in the last 2 games of the Finals. Because A) He was not getting shit done. And B) I don't think him goofing around in practice after the ass-kicking in game 1, piling pucks on his head and whatnot, sat pretty well with the veterans core and with the coaching staff. It's the f***ing Stanley Cup Final. It's war out there. There's no place for children.
But absolutely. He's still young. Let's repeat that to ourselves year in and year out. Like we did like Galchenyuk. Like we did with the Kostitsyns. And then when he gets traded for a 2nd round pick or another similar prospect, we can remind ourselves how we're doomed because the coaching staff and management "ruins" every single one of our prospects.
I challenge anyone here to come up with 3 videos where the guy fed a teammate with an obvious scoring chance by passing the puck on his tape. I swear. 95% of the time it's the same damn story. Guy gets into the zone with tunnel vision. His speed doesn't allow him to gain time and space against NHL Ds. He corners himself into having to make a quick decision and he shoots on the pads of the opposing D. Every. Single. Time. Again and again and again.
But yeah. He improved his balance. He falls 60% of the time on board battles instead of 80%.