Good points all, per usual.
I would only add that Bob, and goaltenders like, say, Chris Osgood or the fourth string guy from Vegas who helped them win it all. There are many examples of clubs that win, and win the Cup, with okay goaltending.
It's certainly true that strong goaltending has always been a Boston Bruins hallmark.
However, look at where they are.
They are likely entering a multi-year retool, not limited to a single season next year.
In that case, there may be little to lose and much to gain by turning to DiPietro, Bussi, or both.
Given that the team will likely be better with a clean slate, a healthy #73 & #27; intriguing deadline additions like Mittelstadt, Khusnutdinov, prospect Fraser Minten, and Jokiharju (who appears to have a calming effect on Zadorov); and enough cap space to bring in significant scoring on the wings, going with two NHL untested prospects in DiPietro & Bussi would be a gamble.
But, again, given where they are, there' not much to lose next season.
It won't happen, but I'd like them to bring up both goaltenders for a game or two as this season winds down.
Doing so might be advantageous, for more than a few reasons. One of them being the introduction of competition and specter of possible replacement in Swayman's mind.
I realize he may become -- may -- a legitimate franchise goaltender worthy of his contract.
But he has yet to prove he can handle 65 or 70 games as a #1 NHL goaltender. His play, along with that of the team in front of him, regressed alarmingly in 2024-2025.
Add to this what I believe is an immature, self absorbed and possibly detrimental presence in the room, and trading Swayman (along with his hefty contract) should absolutely be an option going forward.
If the Bruins do decide on a longer-term rebuild then yeah that changes the dynamic and moving Sway becomes less of a problem. But is that their current plan? It doesn't seem to be but reality is we don't really know and of course such things are subject to change. I just can't see the Jacobs signing off on any sort of stretched out road back to contending unless their hands are well and truly forced. Whether or not that's what they should do is a different argument.
And even if they did then moving Sway still presents with risks and challenges. Finding and acquiring genuine A grade goalies is very difficult. You only have to look at the Leafs to see what it looks like when a team is plagued by sub-standard goaltending for years that they can't seem to fix (although they may finally be closer to doing that this year). Yes teams can sometimes unearth a Hill at just the right time, but for every success story like that there are 10-20 that are busts. Ordinary goalies can win Cups but it does make the whole endeavor that much more difficult. So it's a very risky area to fall into.
Of course sticking with Sway has risks too at this point, I get that. So Don has some thinking to do. Getting the call right on this one, whatever 'right' is, could have serious implications for the future of the franchise in the next few years.