Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - As featured in Episode 3 of Amazon's "FACEOFF: Inside the NHL

How does this saga end?

  • Bridge deal

    Votes: 53 20.8%
  • Long term deal

    Votes: 69 27.1%
  • Trade

    Votes: 133 52.2%

  • Total voters
    255

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
33,834
27,066
Milford, NH
One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.
 
Last edited:

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,082
21,460
Maine
I really wish Gross simply hadn't leaked the offer from the Bruins to Spittin'. This is where everything went sour. Up until that point, it was a closed door negotiation. Now everyone is in the mud slinging it around. Can we all agree that it started there?

To be clear, I'm not certain on the money he deserves or should get but rather angry that the whole situation took a curve in the wrong direction and I think the entire fanbase could agree it started right there.

it started last year when Swayman mentioned in separate interviews the hardships he had to endure hearing who the Bruins were comparing him too and having to chin up and play on. Poor guy. It continued when he went on video bragging about his business degree shield of armor he's proudly wearing and that he knows who is comparables are and insinuated he wants to be a goaltender salary trailblazer. Then it was the leaked info to Chicklets and that seemed to be the last straw as far as letting their side bitch in the media without firing back.
 

BTO

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 20, 2019
8,984
11,109
The Big Smoke (unfortunately)
How is it 2024 and people still don't understand that contracts are paying for future expected performance?
Is said performance guaranteed? Because the contract sure is. If Boston pays him $9.5 (which they won’t) can Swayman guarantee them two Vezinas and two Cups? If not then Boston is taking a risk too. And 8/8 (or 7.8/8) is what they’re willing to risk. If he doesn’t like it let him see how many other teams are willing to risk more.

Edit: at 9.5 Boston is assuming *all* of the risk. That’s not how it works, bro. They’re guaranteeing you an 8 year contract, you have to give something in return too. Or we can just go game to game, and if you ever lose two in a row you can go back to Alaska and pump gas with your business degree. Your call.
 
Last edited:

Ladyfan

Miss Bergy, Savvy Quaider and Looch
Sponsor
Jun 8, 2007
64,204
80,362
next to the bench
Or… well maybe not anymore. So many fans have made up their minds about Swayman now - so much so that they’re willing to take a massive L who seems to have a not so good reputation just to never see him in a Bruins uniform again.
...and that would be too bad. Swayman is/was VERY popular with Bruin's fans (kids love him). He is just naive and (IMO) swayed by his agent who seems to not have a very good reputation.

I really hope this works out and he gets signed...and ditches his agent.

It needs to happen soon.
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,795
10,731
NWO
Nah. Your comps are based on position and what specific players are making because of where they play. Mine was based on the market value for the entire league regardless of what position and stats of similar players at that position did.
It doesn't matter what type of comps are used, you literally said on multiple occassions that comps are useless in negotiations. Period. But then just showed you have to use then, proving them not useless.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
30,934
18,054
Dundas
It will all work out with Swayman.
Having said that , Ulmark would have been who I kept and Swayman traded. Being that they both wanted to play 55 + games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,823
22,502
Central MA
It doesn't matter what type of comps are used, you literally said thay comps are useless in negotiations. Period. But then just showed you have to use then, proving them not useless.
No, I used the market. You can split hairs if you want, but I did not use any goalie to reach the numbers. I could also have just as easily pulled the numbers out of thin air because what a goalie signed for 4 years ago is irrelevant to what a guy signs for today. The money is different because the market is different, player comps aside.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SonnyBoy

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,795
10,731
NWO
No, I used the market. You can split hairs if you want, but I did not use any goalie to reach the numbers. I could also have just as easily pulled the numbers out of thin air because what a goalie signed for 4 years ago is irrelevant to what a guy signs for today. The money is different because the market is different, player comps aside.
Yeah and who makes up the market you compared to? Players and goalies.

Either way, I am using the words YOU used. You didn't say player comps or goalie comps, you said COMPS are useless in negotiations
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,416
9,544
Vancouver, B.C.
Friedman confirmed it as so this morning. The Bruins felt like the negotiations went public. It's not that it was only numbers leaking, it was said that the Bruins "lowballed" Swayman and haven't returned Gross' calls for three weeks. It was a public shot at the Bruins' credibility and reputation while negotiations were taking place.
Thank you. I really see that as the point where I tuned out and just begun checking in for real updates.

Since that moment, the entire thing has become a circus and public display of a negotiation.

A mess.
 

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,823
22,502
Central MA
If Swaymans comps are the top skaters in the league he should be playing 82 games a year unless he’s injured.
His comps aren't any players. It's the dollar value the league pays. Big difference.

Yeah and who makes up the market you compared to? Players and goalies.

Either way, I am using the words YOU used. You didn't say player comps or goalie comps, you said COMPS are useless in negotiations
No, I said comps are useless because of them being biased based on who was picking them. Big difference.
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,610
19,244
His comps aren't any players. It's the dollar value the league pays. Big difference.


No, I said comps are useless because of them being biased based on who was picking them. Big difference.
IMG_3752.gif
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad