Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - As featured in Episode 3 of Amazon's "FACEOFF: Inside the NHL

How does this saga end?

  • Bridge deal

    Votes: 53 20.8%
  • Long term deal

    Votes: 69 27.1%
  • Trade

    Votes: 133 52.2%

  • Total voters
    255

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
33,834
27,066
Milford, NH
One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.
 
Last edited:

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,170
23,823
Ok. Enjoy the "real world"

Oh I will. I avoided this cesspool the entire summer because of the constant bickering and arguing over goalie comparables. Over and over, day after day. It was nauseating.

Shame on me for trying to bring a different point of view and go against the masses. I should of known better.

You betcha. Not what I want but it's inevitable at this point.
 

goldenblack

Registered User
Apr 15, 2024
937
2,277
No offense to Cam but I don't think he's clever enough or a good enough actor to pretend to accidentally blurt out a made up number. That would be some serious machiavellian manipulation. Cam is known more for losing his cool in interviews and saying things he shouldn't.

What's more belivable? Cam is frustrated and revealed something he shouldn't? Or an agent with a questionable reputation is lying?

It's exactly this. There's just NO incentive or logic to it.
 

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
9,205
11,941
Make the case. Present me the logical story for why you would say that 64M was declined. Be diabolical and spin this plot. I am ready to be convinced.

I just have no clue if it was ever truly offered to be rejected/declined.

Wouldn’t be the first time the bruins have lied publicly. For example the Mitchell miller thing.

Could go either way but neither have a good track record.
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,279
56,842
Oh I will. I avoided this cesspool the entire summer because of the constant bickering and arguing over goalie comparables. Over and over, day after day. It was nauseating.

Shame on me for trying to bring a different point of view and go against the masses. I should of known better.


You betcha. Not what I want but it's inevitable at this point.
Yeh I think so as well unless both Gross & Sweeney both soften - but seems only Swayman can get this done and he seems jaded
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

HustleB

Cautiously Optimistic
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2017
2,984
3,336
Welcome to the Jungle
To think Gross is lying and the Bruins are being completely straightforward is probably not the right approach. There is some middle ground that makes this all true and I'm guessing it leans in the Bruins favor but that is simply a guess.

I wonder if 8x8 didn't get brought up in conversation without a certified offer. Maybe the Bruins were lead to believe it wouldn't cut it but never actually offered it.

I have to believe the truth lies in the gray area.
 

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,004
18,632
North Andover, MA
To think Gross is lying and the Bruins are being completely straightforward is probably not the right approach. There is some middle ground that makes this all true and I'm guessing it leans in the Bruins favor but that is simply a guess.

I wonder if 8x8 didn't get brought up in conversation without a certified offer. Maybe the Bruins were lead to believe it wouldn't cut it but never actually offered it.

I have to believe the truth lies in the gray area.

"This was the first time that number was discussed" hardly leaves room for gray.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HustleB

SwayHeyKid

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
1,898
2,120
To think Gross is lying and the Bruins are being completely straightforward is probably not the right approach. There is some middle ground that makes this all true and I'm guessing it leans in the Bruins favor but that is simply a guess.

I wonder if 8x8 didn't get brought up in conversation without a certified offer. Maybe the Bruins were lead to believe it wouldn't cut it but never actually offered it.

I have to believe the truth lies in the gray area.
100%
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad