Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - agreed to 8 x 8.25 aav

How does this saga end?

  • Bridge deal

    Votes: 58 19.7%
  • Long term deal

    Votes: 89 30.3%
  • Trade

    Votes: 147 50.0%

  • Total voters
    294
Status
Not open for further replies.

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
34,385
28,262
Milford, NH
One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.
 
Last edited:

TD Charlie

Registered User
Sep 10, 2007
38,448
20,005
haha you and I are on the same page there. I like $7-$7.5 anything $8-$9 seems to high for me but i would be able to accept $8. $9-$10 is an easy that's too much money for me based on his resume.
Yeah I think 8 is alright for MOST people
Another interesting think I've noticed in this debate is that regardless if you're pro-managment or pro-Sway , it seems pretty unanimous that 8/8 is a more than fair offer.
See above.

Dogs and cats living together. Mass hysteria
 

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
34,385
28,262
Milford, NH
all good points.

when they brought Fernandez in Thomas was in his third year playing over 30 games and not a backup and posted .917 and .905 the two years leading up to that.

the year Fernandez came in to challenge Timmy for his spot Timmy put up .921 and Fernandez played 4 games.

the next year Thomas played 54 with a .933 and Fernandez played 28 with a .910. I wouldn't call that cooked i would say Thomas won the job and that seems to be the start of the Bruins trying to carry two very solid goalies very season.

2008-2009
Thomas - Fernandez

2009-2012
Thomas .915; .938; .920- Rask .931; .918; .929 - For 3 full seasons after Rask stole the backup role from Fernandaz after Thomas store the starting job from Fernandez

2012-2013
Rask .929 - Khudobin .920

2013-2014
Rask .930 -Johnson .925

2014-2015
Rask .922 - Svedberg .918

2015-2016
Rask .915 - Gustavsson .908

2016 - 2017
Rask .915 - Khudobin .904

2017 - 2018
Rask .919 - Khudobin .913

2018 - 2019
Rask .912 - Halak .922

2019 - 2020
Rask .929 - Halak .919

2021 - 2022
Ullmark .917 - Swayman .914

2022 - 2023
Ullmark .938 - Swayman .920

thats a pretty crazy history of goalie duos with Non of them having a sv % under .904 at the lowest.

i would love to go back and look at the boards worries between the 2019-2030 season and the 2021-2022 season when we went from Rask/Halak to Ullmark/Swayman. I am sure the comments were look went we went from last year to this year its going to be a dumpster fire lets fire everyone.

worked out pretty good.
And Rask won the job in 2010, but Thomas won it back in 2011.

Thomas was not a happy camper during the Summer of 2010. I remember he removed all of the gold from his mask and pads as an FU to the club.

Rask started game one against the Coyotes in Prague, and Thomas the 2nd game.

I remember when Hannu Toivonen was going to be the next guy.
You just never know what strange twists and turns are going to happen.

Many killed the Ullmark UFA signing, and it turned out to be excellent value.
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
10,064
20,294
I think that this is what the Bruins' brass wants the narrative to be.

However, by locking in at 8 years for that cap hit, Swayman likely leaves millions on the table during his prime years.

If I'm Swayman, give me the $8m per, but times 2 years and I want another bite at the apple when I can lock in at $10m AAV.

If I'm the club, I say the $8m per is only good if you go long term. If you want 2 years instead, it's at $6.5m.
Again, why on earth would the club give him a bridge deal that walks him to free agency? A two year deal would never be on the table.
 

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
34,385
28,262
Milford, NH
Again, why on earth would the club give him a bridge deal that walks him to free agency? A two year deal would never be on the table.
Because he's restricted and because you're trying to compete and make a run.

If he's not going to sign long term, when what's the alternative?

Let him sit out? Trade him for pennies on the dollar?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC

Scotto74

taking a break
Oct 7, 2005
23,275
3,391
Kingston, MA
Because he's restricted and because you're trying to compete and make a run.

If he's not going to sign long term, when what's the alternative?

Let him sit out? Trade him for pennies on the dollar?
exactly sign him to a bridge deal and then if he proves he can continue what he has done so far and you feel he will never sign with you long term flip him at the trade deadline for a kings ransom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad