Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman -V - all still silent

Status
Not open for further replies.

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
9,313
12,113
Has Swayman proven he's worth $9x8? You would give in because the alternatives seem worse? It's been proven you can win without a top 5 paid goalie. Plus, Swayman has no leverage except sitting out.

Top 5 paid goalies sure have been winning a lot of cups lately though. On top of that there been a top 5 paid goalie in each of the last 6 Stanley cup finals.

It certainly doesn’t seem to be something that holds teams back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Quincy

Donnie Shulzhoffer

Rocket Surgery
Sep 9, 2008
16,468
12,526
Foxboro, MA
Has Swayman proven he's worth $9x8? You would give in because the alternatives seem worse? It's been proven you can win without a top 5 paid goalie. Plus, Swayman has no leverage except sitting out.
No. Yes. No and then yes. No again, but maybe yes.

I am thinking maybe I am right but at the same time being wrong at the same time:
 

LiseL

Registered User
Sponsor
Sep 25, 2023
873
956
It’s actually funny if you go back to the post game threads and game day threads for when we played against korpisalo.


There’s a whole post game thread convo about how lucky we are to have Ullmark/swayman and how lucky we are to not be a poverty franchise and stuck with bad goalies like korpisalo.

The game day threads had comments like “and this is what bad goal tending looks like”

There are comments saying “if ottawa has swayman/Ullmark instead of korpisalo/forsberg then they are likely a playoff team.

Now that he gets traded here it’s a completely different tune.
I hope that having the Ullmark/Forsberg tandem gives the Sens a shot of making the playoffs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BMC

Mr. Make-Believe

The happy genius of my household
What is his leverage?

What exactly is his leverage?

Holding out?
Hoping Boston's other goalies faulter?
Request a trade?
Price himself out of Boston's economic plan?
Doing so may force Boston to trade other player's hurting overall team depth just to fit the cap.
Same leverage any good player has.

That he's a good player. That the team is better with him than without.

If he had "no leverage" then he'd be in line for whatever Sweeney decided to give him, no? Zero leverage? League minimum. That or zero. You have no leverage.

Every time I read it, it's astounding how nonsense it is.
 

Nothingbutglass

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
4,682
4,123
Same leverage any good player has.

That he's a good player. That the team is better with him than without.

If he had "no leverage" then he'd be in line for whatever Sweeney decided to give him, no? Zero leverage? League minimum. That or zero. You have no leverage.

Every time I read it, it's astounding how nonsense it is.
We are talking about contract leverage in a business sense. In current CBA, Swayman can agree to contract with Bruins, hold out, play in Europe and Bruins keep his rights for extra year. If Swayman doesnt play, Bruins are a worse team no doubt. Doesn't mean you agree to a contract you believe is an overpay. Bruins somehow managed to negotiate big deals with Pasta and McAvoy pretty easy. No one said they took discounts. Weird its only Swayman and Lewis Gross have had issues negotiating with them.
 

Pia8988

Registered User
May 26, 2014
14,659
9,232
We are talking about contract leverage in a business sense. In current CBA, Swayman can agree to contract with Bruins, hold out, play in Europe and Bruins keep his rights for extra year. If Swayman doesnt play, Bruins are a worse team no doubt. Doesn't mean you agree to a contract you believe is an overpay. Bruins somehow managed to negotiate big deals with Pasta and McAvoy pretty easy. No one said they took discounts. Weird its only Swayman and Lewis Gross have had issues negotiating with them.

If Don Sweeney is willing to throw away an entire season over his ego. Well, good thing he sucks up to Cam and Harry.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,554
21,997
Tyler, TX
Same leverage any good player has.

That he's a good player. That the team is better with him than without.

If he had "no leverage" then he'd be in line for whatever Sweeney decided to give him, no? Zero leverage? League minimum. That or zero. You have no leverage.

Every time I read it, it's astounding how nonsense it is.
It’s the same leverage any good player has and the reason why the Bruins are willing to offer him 6 or 7 million a year instead of a league minimum. I don’t think he has any real leverage to drive the price much higher than that.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,368
11,678
We are talking about contract leverage in a business sense. In current CBA, Swayman can agree to contract with Bruins, hold out, play in Europe and Bruins keep his rights for extra year. If Swayman doesnt play, Bruins are a worse team no doubt. Doesn't mean you agree to a contract you believe is an overpay. Bruins somehow managed to negotiate big deals with Pasta and McAvoy pretty easy. No one said they took discounts. Weird its only Swayman and Lewis Gross have had issues negotiating with them.
Yes we are talking about business sense. If he had no leverage then the B's would have him signed for 6 years at $3.8m a year.

And Sweeney has agreed to plenty of contracts that were overpays. Most of them on players who were bottom half of the roster guys.

Perhaps you should look up Bill Veeck. About 50 years ago he said: "It isn't the high price of stars that is expensive, it's the high price of mediocrity."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Make-Believe

Ozzy Osbourne

Registered User
Nov 14, 2023
1,602
1,832
Who was the idiot GM that over paid the useless Chris Kelly? There have been plenty of over-pays for mediocre crap over the years, but we choose to play hardball with a Vezina caliber goalie? How friggin stupid if that’s the case.

I would go five years 37.5 and not think twice. Does anyone have any idea what the asking price is?
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,813
19,744
Who was the idiot GM that over paid the useless Chris Kelly? There have been plenty of over-pays for mediocre crap over the years, but we choose to play hardball with a Vezina caliber goalie? How friggin stupid if that’s the case.

I would go five years 37.5 and not think twice. Does anyone have any idea what the asking price is?
Pretty confident in saying it’s more than 5 years $37.5M. But no one knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins

Donnie Shulzhoffer

Rocket Surgery
Sep 9, 2008
16,468
12,526
Foxboro, MA
I would go multiple years less money and less years more money. Maybe trade him. Maybe make him sit out. Maybe I could keep speculating about what I don’t know.

Decisions, decisions.
 

Pizza!Pizza!

Registered User
Sep 25, 2018
4,827
7,370
Imagine if it came out that Swayman deliberately waited until the day before the season starts to sign because he was mad they traded his buddy Ullmark away and it had nothing to do with money.
 

Nothingbutglass

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
4,682
4,123
Not playing. Thus, forcing Sweeney to ride Korpisaloland then answering questions when he inevitably shits the bed. He might be an ok stop gap, but he’s not a full time solution
Sure, that's one plan. You don't get paid or earn any service time, but yeah, it's an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodit9
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad