Proposal: Jeremy Swayman for Casey Mittlestadt, Isak Rosen and a 2nd.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Bruins can t miss on this because they need a replacement for Bergeron.If you trade a goalie offer either with a package to get a first line center.No one is even close in the organization.Only other option is to overpay in free agency,and that will cost you to lose more players due to the salary cap.
 
Swayman could be the rare goalie because of age and performance, that could pull a 1st rounder plus . See Schneider ( except Swayman is better ) . I think if he went somewhere like Ottawa that would really set them up for the future ( division complications aside ) . The cost would be significantly more than a Middlestat level return regardless..
 
Boston would never do it. Swayman is going to be the guy in the future if or when Ullmark dips.

The Sabres should make a pitch to Philly for Hart instead.
 
Let me state the current cap situation for the Bruins.

They have $73 million tied up in 13 players for next year. That means that have about $10.5 million to sign about 9 players, including Swayman, Bergeron, Krejci or their replacements.

Swayman will probably cost about $4 million.

I think it would be cap malfeasance to use what very little cap space they have to pay that to a back up goalie.

I suggested Mittlestadt because he can play 2C and is relatively cheap. I think it takes more than Rosen and a second but I don’t foresee a scenario where both he and Ullmark are on the team unless they plan on them playing forward as well.
 
Let me state the current cap situation for the Bruins.

They have $73 million tied up in 13 players for next year. That means that have about $10.5 million to sign about 9 players, including Swayman, Bergeron, Krejci or their replacements.

Swayman will probably cost about $4 million.

I think it would be cap malfeasance to use what very little cap space they have to pay that to a back up goalie.

I suggested Mittlestadt because he can play 2C and is relatively cheap. I think it takes more than Rosen and a second but I don’t foresee a scenario where both he and Ullmark are on the team unless they plan on them playing forward as well.

$6 million of the $73 million that's tied up is on Forbort & Reilly. Both can be moved or bought out in the off-season.
 
Why would Ottawa give up Pinto when they can offersheet him in the 3's for a second round pick?
Because Boston would match it rather than lose him for that ? 3 million for Swayman would be a bargain . Look what Knight garnered. I think the only way they deal him would be if Boston wins the cup and they do him a solid dealing him to a situation where he’s able to be the guy . I personally think that place will ultimately still be Boston ( deal Ullmark at some pt instead) .
 
What's the motivation for Boston? Why would they break up a tandem that is leading them to one of the best records in NHL history?

For Casey Mittlestadt? Get serious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Score08
$6 million of the $73 million that's tied up is on Forbort & Reilly. Both can be moved or bought out in the off-season.
You still need to replace those 2 players with other players. Let's say they are on ELC that means 2M

And then you have to add Bergy and Krejci Bonuses
 
Because Boston would match it rather than lose him for that ? 3 million for Swayman would be a bargain . Look what Knight garnered. I think the only way they deal him would be if Boston wins the cup and they do him a solid dealing him to a situation where he’s able to be the guy . I personally think that place will ultimately still be Boston ( deal Ullmark at some pt instead) .

Boston is cap tight if Ottawa pushes it to 4M AAV boston might not be able to match it.
 
Have people seen what goalies fetch? Always very low. At best a 2nd and ok prospect is what he would get.
 
Boston is cap tight if Ottawa pushes it to 4M AAV boston might not be able to match it.
I think worse case scenario is they match a high offer sheet/suck it up and deal him for a better return when it’s allowed ( ie I think you can’t trade a player for a certain period after they sign an offer sheet ) . They’ll have time to move around bodies if need be imo .

Have people seen what goalies fetch? Always very low. At best a 2nd and ok prospect is what he would get.
Schneider/Anderson say hi and they are almost never this combination of high performing and youthful . He easily gets a 1 st plus
 
I think worse case scenario is they match a high offer sheet/suck it up and deal him for a better return when it’s allowed ( ie I think you can’t trade a player for a certain period after they sign an offer sheet ) . They’ll have time to move around bodies if need be imo .


Schneider/Anderson say hi and they are almost never this combination of high performing and youthful . He easily gets a 1 st plus

So 2 trades against many many more that were much less is what equals true value?

81g-48-23-7, 2.22gaa .920 sv 9so

At 24 years old

Please stop

Oh your right, he will fetch 3 1sts and 8 teams will make this offer.
 
So 2 trades against many many more that were much less is what equals true value?



Oh you’re right, he will fetch 3 1sts and 8 teams will make this offer.
Find a similar aged goalie that has similar results that was dealt . I’ll wait . It’s not an apples to apples comparison. Im not a Bruins fan /have no skin in the game ( opposite really ) .
 
As a Bruins fan, that's simply way too much value for Swayman

With that said if it came down to the Bruins moving a goalie I would actually prefer they move Ullmark.

Cash in on him having a Hart trophy worthy season and still have your goalie of the future that fits the re-tool we likely have to do over the next 2 years

Moving Ullmark would make more sense but since he has a full NMC, that's not really an option.
 
I don't see why Boston couldn't roll with both goalies for the remainder of Ullmark's contract. Swayman will get a decent raise but not unaffordable.
 
Why would Ottawa give up Pinto when they can offersheet him in the 3's for a second round pick?

The one caveat that tends to get overlooked with offer sheets is whether a player would sign it. Montreal approached Brayden Point and he declined (Montreal then pivoted to Sebastian Aho). When the Devils were in cap purgatory before the 2006-07 season, Brian Gionta said he declined overtures to sign an offer sheet. Gionta had won a Cup with the team in 2003 and felt some degree of loyalty.

It's possible that Swayman is happy with his situation in Boston. But he could always use the threat of an offer sheet to get his next contract with Boston.

We'll see what the RFA thresholds for this coming offseason will be. A 4.2 mil AAV offer sheet would have netted a 2nd rounder with the current 82.5 mil cap. Next year's cap is expected to be 83.5 mil, so the RFA range will probably get a slight bump.

It'd take some cap maneuvering, but I think Boston could handle Swayman getting something close to the Spencer Knight second contract (3x4.5).

And then the other pesky thing with offer sheets is the timing. Say you did offer sheet Swayman on the first day of free agency, Boston would get a week to match. Meanwhile the rest of the goalie market would commence while you were waiting. If Boston did match, then you'd be stuck with the leftovers on the UFA market or you'd be on the trade hunt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad