Jeff Petry healthy scratched 2 games after trade to Detroit

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I caught flak for suggesting that it was a bit weird for Detroit to be going into the season basically guaranteed to be parking effectively $3M+ in the press box on any given night when healthy.

I didn't think Petry would be the guy sitting out, but this was always the inevitability. Someone fairly expensive has to sit out. That's just the reality of the way the number of bodies works there.


It's not really the end of the world. Teams are rarely ever fully healthy all year. Injuries will happen and they'll make use of all the guys they've accumulated. It's also not necessarily a bad thing, when some of these guys are quite a bit older and could likely use a few odd rest days and to manage their workload and keep them a little bit more fresh.


But it's definitely an unusual, unconventional, somewhat inefficient seeming cap allocation strategy. But it's also clearly just a thing that sort of fell into their lap with Petry after they'd already mostly sorted their defence previously. You don't turn down a $2.4M Top-4 RHD acquired for basically spare parts. Just made for a crowded situation on their blueline, especially with Edvinsson pressing. It'll all work itself out in time though. Better problem to have, than to not have enough NHL caliber defencemen (as some teams are clearly dealing with).
 
  • Like
Reactions: raymond23
But it's definitely an unusual, unconventional, somewhat inefficient seeming cap allocation strategy.
I mean, it's the opposite of ineffecient. Ineffecient is believing you need the cheapest possible 6-7D even though you have lots of cap space. Ineffecient is not using your cap space. Yeah, ideally they could spend 7 million on a legit top 4D instead of 2 mil on a #6D, but that doesn't make it ineffecient when the former option isn't even available.
 
I mean, it's the opposite of ineffecient. Ineffecient is believing you need the cheapest possible 6-7D even though you have lots of cap space. Ineffecient is not using your cap space. Yeah, ideally they could spend 7 million on a legit top 4D instead of 2 mil on a #6D, but that doesn't make it ineffecient when the former option isn't even available.

Plus DRWs already have a young 6'6" stud top 4 guy marinating in AHL right now.

Yzerman is efficiently using his capspace to stockpile Trade Deadline guys now instead of waiting til TDL. All he needs to do is rotate guys until then. It's genius, actually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad