66-30-33
Registered User
That’s why he was traded, no regrets here.Wow that's a scorching hot take
That’s why he was traded, no regrets here.Wow that's a scorching hot take
This whole thread should be nominated for the overreaction of the year award.
I mean, it's the opposite of ineffecient. Ineffecient is believing you need the cheapest possible 6-7D even though you have lots of cap space. Ineffecient is not using your cap space. Yeah, ideally they could spend 7 million on a legit top 4D instead of 2 mil on a #6D, but that doesn't make it ineffecient when the former option isn't even available.But it's definitely an unusual, unconventional, somewhat inefficient seeming cap allocation strategy.
I mean, it's the opposite of ineffecient. Ineffecient is believing you need the cheapest possible 6-7D even though you have lots of cap space. Ineffecient is not using your cap space. Yeah, ideally they could spend 7 million on a legit top 4D instead of 2 mil on a #6D, but that doesn't make it ineffecient when the former option isn't even available.
I'll take Karlsson over Petry any day of the week and I liked Petry when he was a Penguin. He was decent here.
been bottom pairing guy for last two seasons .....now he is a 7 or 8 depth injury filler