Jason Botterill Discussion Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dirty Dog

Wooftastic
Sponsor
Jul 11, 2013
12,190
14,955
The doghouse
No, talent is the number 1 problem. Instead of finding contributing pieces, let alone core pieces, he's spent 3 summers punting and has been unable to fill in anything, even with the gift of the lottery win for Dahlin.

It is incredible the few spots in the lineup he has filled with long term solutions since his tenure began. Dahlin at LD, Pilut at LD, Joker at RD, Skinner at LW, Olofsson at LW (maybe montour at RD, maybe)....and that is about it (and virtually none of those were him actively doing anything). Meanwhile, he has actually created holes that previously had long term solutions.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,942
111,599
Tarnation
It is incredible the few spots in the lineup he has filled with long term solutions since his tenure began. Dahlin at LD, Pilut at LD, Joker at RD, Skinner at LW, Olofsson at LW (maybe montour at RD, maybe)....and that is about it (and virtually none of those were him actively doing anything). Meanwhile, he has actually created holes that previously had long term solutions.

Looking at Montour's impacts, I don't think he's a long-term solution. Skinner was also a gift - two teams he'd accept a deal to and one of those had no cap space. The great humor in all of that is the contract they gave Skinner and how that's going to handicap them so very soon.
 

Dirty Dog

Wooftastic
Sponsor
Jul 11, 2013
12,190
14,955
The doghouse
Why isn't Krueger part of the problem?

The team is so poorly constructed, we are the only team in hockey that can't ice 12 f***ing forwards. And even though there isn't a full lineup of forwards, about half of them fart around the ice....not because they aren't coached properly, but because they are not good at hockey.

That is why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed

Bendium

Registered User
Oct 18, 2019
1,907
1,489
Percentages that this team fires Botterill at the conclusion of the season?
Less than 10%. The Pegulas are not hands off and have been involved in discussing options, concepts, trade possibilities etc. Jason discussed the cap situation from the very start and will just finally be starting to clear some of it now. They will go through this off season and into next season before he is in trouble. If we are struggling by the midpoint next year then I would expect a change, but not now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beerme1

Sabre Dance

Make Hockey Fun Again
Jul 27, 2006
12,601
2,384
The team is so poorly constructed, we are the only team in hockey that can't ice 12 ****ing forwards. And even though there isn't a full lineup of forwards, about half of them fart around the ice....not because they aren't coached properly, but because they are not good at hockey.

That is why.
It's been an ongoing issue that continues with Krueger. We haven't hired a real NHL coach since firing Ruff. It's just a fact. That's where our dysfunction beings and ends.

I guess we could say it's been the GM as well. We need to try to get people experienced.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,942
111,599
Tarnation
Are you really using hindsight to judge a prospect pool from 3 years ago? That's the kind of mental gymnastics you gotta use to somehow convince yourself Botterill isn't horribly incapable?

And if the idea is to leave out the lottery picks from then, then the one thing buoying the current list per Wheeler's article is a lottery pick, then a whole lot of meh.
 

Buffaloed

webmaster
Feb 27, 2002
43,322
23,581
Niagara Falls
Less than 10%. The Pegulas are not hands off and have been involved in discussing options, concepts, trade possibilities etc. Jason discussed the cap situation from the very start and will just finally be starting to clear some of it now. They will go through this off season and into next season before he is in trouble. If we are struggling by the midpoint next year then I would expect a change, but not now.

That was my impression until I read Tim Graham's article last June.

The Satchel: Tim Graham answers your questions on Mogilny's...
In fact, Terry Pegula has been increasingly hands-off over the years with both the Sabres and Bills. He hires executives to do those jobs and lets them work without meddling.
Pegula has final say over every personnel move; that is any owner’s prerogative. But insight from those who know insist Pegula provides Sabres GM Jason Botterill and Bills GM Brandon Beane all the latitude and resources they wish

Many folks are upset the Pegulas haven’t installed a hockey or football czar above Botterill or Beane, or haven’t hired another president since Russ Brandon’s firing. I don’t understand why this is a controversial issue. The term “president” isn’t consistently applied throughout sports. A president with one club might be what another team calls its general manager or its vice president of hockey operations. Some presidents handle only the business and carry zero sway on sports decisions. Botterill and Beane are in charge, so there’s no need for a president, no purpose for another layer in between either GM and the Pegulas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirty Dog

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,439
5,189
Many folks are upset the Pegulas haven’t installed a hockey or football czar above Botterill or Beane, or haven’t hired another president since Russ Brandon’s firing. I don’t understand why this is a controversial issue. The term “president” isn’t consistently applied throughout sports. A president with one club might be what another team calls its general manager or its vice president of hockey operations. Some presidents handle only the business and carry zero sway on sports decisions. Botterill and Beane are in charge, so there’s no need for a president, no purpose for another layer in between either GM and the Pegulas.

I think a President pointing out how the lower layer is trash (GM) to the upper layer (Owners) serves a very useful purpose.
 

SabresFan26

Registered User
May 28, 2003
11,025
2,518
Visit site
No, talent is the number 1 problem. Instead of finding contributing pieces, let alone core pieces, he's spent 3 summers punting and has been unable to fill in anything, even with the gift of the lottery win for Dahlin.
They're arguing hire a proven winner. We hired Dan Bylsma how did that work without talent on the roster?
 

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,733
42,658
Hamburg,NY
Percentages that this team fires Botterill at the conclusion of the season?
I still think it’s zero. Not because that’s the way it should be but he didn’t sound like a guy with anything to worry about in his recent interview.

There was no sense of urgency about the playoffs or feeling he needed to do whatever it took to get there. It was depressing to listen to him talk about waiting to see if this current group could make a push before the deadline. If they did he might get help. If they didn’t he would probably sell.

That comes across to me as someone not worried about having to deal with any consequences for missing the playoffs.

It’s also supremely frustrating that he doesn’t seem to realize the team needed help yesterday to have a shot at the playoffs. That was before Ullmark got hurt.
 

SabresFan26

Registered User
May 28, 2003
11,025
2,518
Visit site
I wasn't in the "fire Botterill" camp but after tonight's game, and the articles that have come out showing the pathetic status of the organizational depth, I'm leaning towards getting rid of him now.

The players he keeps bringing in keep not producing. Under 2 different coaching staffs. It's gotten to the point that his talent evaluations just can't be trusted.
I am waiting until this summer/beginning of next season to cast my vote of confidence. It's not looking good but again, I think everyone should get at least 3-4 years to show progression before getting an extension or termination in the pro sports world as development of drafting/prospects isn't an overnight process.

Again this summer is everything. There are 0 excuses after July 1 for this management team.
 

SabresFan26

Registered User
May 28, 2003
11,025
2,518
Visit site
I still think it’s zero. Not because that’s the way it should be but he didn’t sound like a guy with anything to worry about in his recent interview.

There was no sense of urgency about the playoffs or feeling he needed to do whatever it took to get there. It was depressing to listen to him talk about waiting to see if this current group could make a push before the deadline. If they did he might get help. If they didn’t he would probably sell.

That comes across to me as someone not worried about having to deal with any consequences for missing the playoffs.

It’s also supremely frustrating that he doesn’t seem to realize the team needed help yesterday to have a shot at the playoffs. That was before Ullmark got hurt.
I agree with this. It's almost like the Pegula's are ok and he knows it to be bad for 3 years wasting Jack Eichel. Do they flip the switch and say playoffs or bust next year? I have defended Botterill at times on certain issues but some of the management decisions have been horrible most notably the defensive depth not being moved for forward help. Why is Bogosian not waived or Rodrigues for that matter? We are better with their capspace if they are claimed to go and acquire someone.

Why did we acquire Colin Miller for a 2nd and a 5th (at the time looked like a solid deal) only for him to be a healthy scratch over Bogosian?
 

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,733
42,658
Hamburg,NY
Botterill is a great GM and isn’t going anywhere

He has a big offseason ahead of him tho
As someone who has defended Botts over a lot of things and giving him the benefit of the doubt far more than most. I have to ask what on earth makes you think he is a great GM? Because that is an absolutely bonkers assertion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad