monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
Value of: - Jake Evans | Page 15 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Value of: Jake Evans

Getting a first for taking on a cap dump is pretty normal. That wasn't some masterclass by Hughes, it was par the course. Getting a first from Winnipeg for a player like Monahan was a normal trade, again not some masterclass or fleecing.

Laine was another cap dump who clearly had no interest in playing for his team at the time and was damaged goods. Columbus didn't have many options given he's overpaid and they didn't want to retain.
If you say so
 
Will he be the first Hab to accept differed money to lower his AAV ?
Hugues was asked about it in his press conference today ;)

1736366885112.png
 
In Canada the top federal income tax bracket which after the first quarter million was 33%
If you're going to correct me, at least give complete information and not incomplete info that gives the wrong impression.
In Quebec, combined federal and provincial income tax is 53.31%

 
Last edited:
If you're going to correct me, at least give complete information and not incomplete info that gives the wrong impression.
In Quebec, combined federal and provincial income tax is 53.31%

That would be bracket. What is the effective rate including what you pay if your accountant is decent for someone paid a million cause one not be paying $533,100? Does not happen in the real world.
 
I read somewhere this morning, I think it was Spector, that the league won't do anything about it. They approved it. And it kinda shuts down the long lasting idea that some teams have an edge because of taxes on player's revenues. At least it provides players & teams a way around it.

I think Montreal should really look into this...

The league hasn't done anything about it, doesn't mean they wont. Its likely going to be the same as the super long contracts to bring down the AAV - the NHL will keep warning teams until one crosses the murky line of what they deem clear cap circumvention and get hit with a punishment.

They are still paying 50% income tax on that 5M, and most tax-sheltered accounts (RRSP, RESP, and TFSA, in Canada) have limited contribution room. Evans' 7k TFSA contribution is a drop in the bucket, overall. (I'd take that drop anytime, though)

You're right that capital gains from investments should be pushed back, allowing them to realize those gains from another tax jurisdiction.

RRSP, RESP and TFSA are not the only ways individuals can shelter capital gains and/or defer tax.
 
The thing with Montreal is that we already have a bunch of picks and we need more quality than quantity right now, I wouldn't be against trading a 3rd or late 2nd with Evans to go up for a late first but trading him for a 3rd or AHL prospect doesn't change anything. I'd rather keep him at that point, very good veteran
 
They are still paying 50% income tax on that 5M, and most tax-sheltered accounts (RRSP, RESP, and TFSA, in Canada) have limited contribution room. Evans' 7k TFSA contribution is a drop in the bucket, overall. (I'd take that drop anytime, though)

You're right that capital gains from investments should be pushed back, allowing them to realize those gains from another tax jurisdiction.

Sure, but they simply set up RCA's instead. There's a sizeable ecosystem built around this & avoiding the eventual outcome set you're thinking of is not that hard, it's just expensive.

In Canada the top federal income tax bracket which after the first quarter million was 33%

Factor in provincial tax rates and consumption taxes and you're getting much closer to 65 than you are 33. QC alone hits these guys at 25.75% for our 41 home games. O Canada!
 
Sure, but they simply set up RCA's instead. There's a sizeable ecosystem built around this & avoiding the eventual outcome set you're thinking of is not that hard, it's just expensive.



Factor in provincial tax rates and consumption taxes and you're getting much closer to 65 than you are 33. QC alone hits these guys at 25.75% for our 41 home games. O Canada!
Can you explain what happened with the Tavares tax scandal?
 
Evans looking at a jt Compher type of contract?

C Coyle comes to my mind. Evans's numbers are a little behind Coyle's from the Wild but you can see the same type of thing. Someone who is showing maturity and does the little things well.

Pretty sure Evans' agent will make the Coyle comparison and add inflation. Reaching a little but that's what agents do. It also depends on how Evans finishes the season as well.

I think the next 3-5 years will be good years for Evans.
 
Always interesting, most guys, who are on expiring contracts, seem to play better....
I hope we keep Evans, but only if his agent is going to be somewhat reasonable......I would go 4M X 4 years and as the cap rises and we rid ourselves of bad contracts ( Dvo,Gally, Andy ) that should be a decent deal for both sides.
 
Montreal should sell no matter what

7/8 years in the difference between Suzuki and Demidov. That's our core build up and we want to transition up. Then there is a gap after Suzuki. Dach is playing well lately, so lets say he stays at 2C. Then what without Evans? Just pencil in Beck and Kapanen next year? Who are not ready for full time center roles in the NHL?

It's one thing for one or both of Beck and Kapanen to crack the roster next year as wingers with a good center to shelter them but the other way around? We just went through that with Barron on our D. He was not ready and the ripple effects with our team D was massive.

We will consider selling but this is not some automatic yes or no answer. There will be a lot of circumstances that play out in the next 6 weeks.
 
If they trade him they are gapped in the top 9 and need to insta replace him. Beck may be the guy, but thats a big jump from the AHL. So I can’t see a trade for picks, you need C depth coming back.

I think they figure out a way to sign him.
 
Montreal should sell no matter what
Armia and Savard are only ever going to bring back 3rd (or possibly a 2nd if the market is seller friendly as it is some years and not others). They just aren't good enough to fetch more.

But Evans... That guy is really good. Habs will be worse on the ice the moment he's not on the roster. He'd be like losing a Danault or Artturi Lehkonen. He's not as good as either of them, but he is cut from the same cloth type of player.

Easily the most value TDL asset the Habs have this season.

Don't be surprised when Jake Evans signs his next contract that looks like this.

6 years $29.4MM (AAV of $4.9MM/per).
If 6 years $29.4MM (AAV of $4.9MM/per) is what Jake Evans is looking for, I'd agree Montreal should sell no matter what. If Evans is agreeable to 50% of the term and 60% of the AAV, I'd keep him.
 

The Devils are among the teams that have called the Canadiens about acquiring pending unrestricted free agent center Jake Evans ahead of the March 7 trade deadline, Pierre LeBrun of TSN said on “Early Trading” on Thursday.​


One thing he said as added context is the Devils have Evans on their list but the list is just not 3 players. LeBrun knows how fans/media can spin things and the past talk about if players get a 1st rounder or not.

I have no doubt in my mind that several of the top 10 teams have circled Evans as a potential target but then you wonder... teams hate trading those 1st. Some teams will call and give the 2nd and B+ prospect knowing that Hughes might get the 1st from someone else. They tell Hughes to call me back if you don't. That type of thing.

However, I do think the late 1st is very possible. Supply/Demand for centers will be high and I just don't see too much options? Do you?
 
If 6 years $29.4MM (AAV of $4.9MM/per) is what Jake Evans is looking for, I'd agree Montreal should sell no matter what. If Evans is agreeable to 50% of the term and 60% of the AAV, I'd keep him.

3 years is the sweet spot for the Habs. It overlaps Demidov's ELC and also gives more time to properly develop Kapanen, Beck, Hage at center.

Monahan just got 5 years at $5.5M. Evans has been playing well and is a very effective center but no way Evans is getting 6 years at $4.9M from anybody. If teams offer the 6 year term, they will offer $4M or less.

Evans has earned his right and is playing well. But this is being overblown a bit. He's an effective 3C. This is not some Monahan or Danault situation.... Evans is good but not as good as them.

3x $4M from the Habs. I can see some teams offering 5x $4M.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->