Former Bruins Jake DeBrusk - gone to Nucks

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Ladyfan

Miss Bergy, Savvy Quaider and Looch
Sponsor
Jun 8, 2007
64,182
80,339
next to the bench
He is gone and I still don’t really care if he stayed either way.

The man just overthinks it
That is how I feel. I just didn't want to overpay. He didn't get too much $ but 7 years...nope.

Playoff performer Jake is one of the biggest myth since the end of playoffs. Wasn't there already a poster who dismissed this claim?
Yes, there was. Jake did well this playoff season, but had they gone on past round 2 who knows. Plus, clearly you have to look at more than one season of playoffs.

I wish Jake the best but am not sad he moved on. Seems like his plan was to go.
 

gerrycheeversmask

Registered User
Feb 18, 2021
415
826
Behind Enemy Lines
Playoff performer Jake is one of the biggest myth since the end of playoffs. Wasn't there already a poster who dismissed this claim?
The way Jake played in the playoffs is how I expect an elite player to play during the regular season.

In the playoffs, Debrusk didn't have another gear to carrry the team on his back. Sometime's during the playoffs you need that type of performance (see NYR's Chris Kreider for example).
I just didn't see it.
 

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,823
22,498
Central MA
Is it really a question that C is more important than RW? Seems pretty obvious. I agree with certain criticisms of Sweeney but I'm glad he made the decision to get Lindholm at the expense of Debrusk. He upgraded at C and at wing (Zacha > Debrusk).

There's certainly a hole in the 2RW spot right now, but it's a much easier and cheaper spot to fill at the trade deadline than getting a top 6 C.
Generally speaking sure. But here's the rub. How effective will that 2C be playing with bottom 6 guys slotting up? It's not just that they filled the hole at C, there is now a new hole at RW and the question is really how does that impact the overall performance? Love him or hate him, JDB still put up 46 goals in that spot over the last 2 years.
 

The Murph

Registered User
Feb 25, 2018
776
925
Willing to bet that contract ends up great when all said and done.

At this point of DeBrusk's career, the Bruin's developed one hell of an all round player, with potential for some serious future production. Unfortunately, another team is going to get the prime years of this player. Little worried he lights it up, and it takes a while for the Bruin's to find an equal or better winger than him in the foreseeable future.

But as of the end of this season, don't think the Bruin's had the chance to sign him. He'd rather have a fresh start, the Canucks came knocking, and they actually look like a better fit. Just like Lindholm seems a better fit in Boston.
 

Mione134

Queen in the North
Sponsor
Mar 30, 2010
38,648
43,014
Hogwarts-617
Playoff performer Jake is one of the biggest myth since the end of playoffs. Wasn't there already a poster who dismissed this claim?
I'll remember him being clutch in 2019 and money. And if we had won Game 7, he'd been a hero here.

He's not Chris Kreider. But I'll say this. You would always notice him in the playoffs. The good type of notice. Effort. Speed. Those will forget how fun it was to watch him. Especially this last playoff run.

He stepped up. I'm very interested to see which Bruins takes the mantle. Especially these new players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigGoalBrad

Bruins4Lifer

Registered User
Jun 28, 2006
8,918
990
Regina, SK
Generally speaking sure. But here's the rub. How effective will that 2C be playing with bottom 6 guys slotting up? It's not just that they filled the hole at C, there is now a new hole at RW and the question is really how does that impact the overall performance? Love him or hate him, JDB still put up 46 goals in that spot over the last 2 years.
Nothing changed, there was always a hole in a top 6 wing spot last year. Debrusk played both wings (ended the year at LW), so whichever wing he didn't play they had a bottom 6 guy slotting up in that spot.

Last year's top 6 wings: Pastrnak, Marchand, Debrusk, ???
This years top 6 wings: Pastrnak, Marchand, Zacha, ???
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSCII

NeelyDan

Spot-Picker
Sponsor
Jun 28, 2010
7,386
15,170
Dundas, Ontario
I'll remember him being clutch in 2019 and money. And if we had won Game 7, he'd been a hero here.

He's not Chris Kreider. But I'll say this. You would always notice him in the playoffs. The good type of notice. Effort. Speed. Those will forget how fun it was to watch him. Especially this last playoff run.

He stepped up. I'm very interested to see which Bruins takes the mantle. Especially these new players.

a .5ppg guy is hardly a mantle Mione lol
 

Number8

Registered User
Oct 31, 2007
18,687
18,853
I really liked him as a player when he was engaged. When he wasn't, which was too often, I found him frustrating.

Nobody can maintain an optimal level of performance at all times, so it becomes a somewhat subjective assessment of on/off ratios. Partly why he was so polarizing here.

I think he's a good dude and I think we'll miss seeing him in a Bruins uniform, but I also think it was time for both parties to move on.

Now I think it's time for us to move on, too.
This IMO is perfectly stated and should/could be used to wrap up the thread.

Nice kid. He’s on another team. Nothing he did or does makes any difference now except maybe the one or two times we see Vancouver in the RS or if we face them in SCF within next 7 years or less.
 

bearcountry17

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
3,317
2,026
South Shore, MA
I would have preferred to trade Zacha and sign Debrusk. Debrusk on his playoff scoring alone is worth significantly more than the 750k more he’s gonna make next year. Could have recouped assets and kept the better player for a very low cost and 5.5m is very fair number now that will only get better as it ages. 1 playoff goal in 25 games is just not gonna cut it in the top 6 on a legit contender.

That said between the media and fan shit and getting taken off of Pp1 for the likes of nick Ritchie and JVR and so on I wouldn’t blame him for wanting a fresh start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
10,510
3,240
Clearly, he did not
Yup. I like Jake but he was off a lot of nights and its been what 9 years he needs a change of scenery and different team. We won the roster trade off with Vancouver they gave up huge assets for Lindholm and Zadorov all to just win 1 round and sign for Boston. They got Jake and PTO Heinen. Its a huge win for us. Anyone who would prefer to have JDB over Lindholm needs their heads examined.
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,718
10,406
Tampa, Florida
Bet Duclaire has a much better year and he was 4 years 14 mill. This contract will be Backes like IMO. Jake owes his agent a Ferrari for this
 

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
9,205
11,940
I'll take Poitras/Peeke/Korpisalo over option A with Debrusk/Branstrom/Bussi.

There’s room for poitras and lysell. Personally I’d rather have the cap space for an extra top 6 winger than have peeke/korpisalo here
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSCII

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,823
22,498
Central MA
A lot of the people saying it’s an issue that JDB was too streaky and a head case are the same folks who made excuses for David Krejci when he’d do his Houdini disappearing act for long stretches. Weird how that is, no?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad