Toggle sidebar

Former Bruins Jake DeBrusk - gone to Nucks

Donnie Shulzhoffer said:
He is gone and I still don’t really care if he stayed either way.

The man just overthinks it
Click to expand...
That is how I feel. I just didn't want to overpay. He didn't get too much $ but 7 years...nope.

Sevendust said:
Playoff performer Jake is one of the biggest myth since the end of playoffs. Wasn't there already a poster who dismissed this claim?
Click to expand...
Yes, there was. Jake did well this playoff season, but had they gone on past round 2 who knows. Plus, clearly you have to look at more than one season of playoffs.

I wish Jake the best but am not sad he moved on. Seems like his plan was to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alicat, caz16, gerrycheeversmask and 2 others
Sevendust said:
Playoff performer Jake is one of the biggest myth since the end of playoffs. Wasn't there already a poster who dismissed this claim?
Click to expand...
The way Jake played in the playoffs is how I expect an elite player to play during the regular season.

In the playoffs, Debrusk didn't have another gear to carrry the team on his back. Sometime's during the playoffs you need that type of performance (see NYR's Chris Kreider for example).
I just didn't see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alicat and Sevendust
Bruins4Lifer said:
Is it really a question that C is more important than RW? Seems pretty obvious. I agree with certain criticisms of Sweeney but I'm glad he made the decision to get Lindholm at the expense of Debrusk. He upgraded at C and at wing (Zacha > Debrusk).

There's certainly a hole in the 2RW spot right now, but it's a much easier and cheaper spot to fill at the trade deadline than getting a top 6 C.
Click to expand...
Generally speaking sure. But here's the rub. How effective will that 2C be playing with bottom 6 guys slotting up? It's not just that they filled the hole at C, there is now a new hole at RW and the question is really how does that impact the overall performance? Love him or hate him, JDB still put up 46 goals in that spot over the last 2 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HumBucker and Mione134
Willing to bet that contract ends up great when all said and done.

At this point of DeBrusk's career, the Bruin's developed one hell of an all round player, with potential for some serious future production. Unfortunately, another team is going to get the prime years of this player. Little worried he lights it up, and it takes a while for the Bruin's to find an equal or better winger than him in the foreseeable future.

But as of the end of this season, don't think the Bruin's had the chance to sign him. He'd rather have a fresh start, the Canucks came knocking, and they actually look like a better fit. Just like Lindholm seems a better fit in Boston.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearljamvs5 and Ladyfan
Sevendust said:
Playoff performer Jake is one of the biggest myth since the end of playoffs. Wasn't there already a poster who dismissed this claim?
Click to expand...
I'll remember him being clutch in 2019 and money. And if we had won Game 7, he'd been a hero here.

He's not Chris Kreider. But I'll say this. You would always notice him in the playoffs. The good type of notice. Effort. Speed. Those will forget how fun it was to watch him. Especially this last playoff run.

He stepped up. I'm very interested to see which Bruins takes the mantle. Especially these new players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigGoalBrad
LSCII said:
Generally speaking sure. But here's the rub. How effective will that 2C be playing with bottom 6 guys slotting up? It's not just that they filled the hole at C, there is now a new hole at RW and the question is really how does that impact the overall performance? Love him or hate him, JDB still put up 46 goals in that spot over the last 2 years.
Click to expand...
Nothing changed, there was always a hole in a top 6 wing spot last year. Debrusk played both wings (ended the year at LW), so whichever wing he didn't play they had a bottom 6 guy slotting up in that spot.

Last year's top 6 wings: Pastrnak, Marchand, Debrusk, ???
This years top 6 wings: Pastrnak, Marchand, Zacha, ???
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSCII
Mione134 said:
I'll remember him being clutch in 2019 and money. And if we had won Game 7, he'd been a hero here.

He's not Chris Kreider. But I'll say this. You would always notice him in the playoffs. The good type of notice. Effort. Speed. Those will forget how fun it was to watch him. Especially this last playoff run.

He stepped up. I'm very interested to see which Bruins takes the mantle. Especially these new players.
Click to expand...

a .5ppg guy is hardly a mantle Mione lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colt.45Orr and Alicat
NeelyDan said:
I really liked him as a player when he was engaged. When he wasn't, which was too often, I found him frustrating.

Nobody can maintain an optimal level of performance at all times, so it becomes a somewhat subjective assessment of on/off ratios. Partly why he was so polarizing here.

I think he's a good dude and I think we'll miss seeing him in a Bruins uniform, but I also think it was time for both parties to move on.

Now I think it's time for us to move on, too.
Click to expand...
This IMO is perfectly stated and should/could be used to wrap up the thread.

Nice kid. He’s on another team. Nothing he did or does makes any difference now except maybe the one or two times we see Vancouver in the RS or if we face them in SCF within next 7 years or less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC, JAD, NeelyDan and 3 others
I would have preferred to trade Zacha and sign Debrusk. Debrusk on his playoff scoring alone is worth significantly more than the 750k more he’s gonna make next year. Could have recouped assets and kept the better player for a very low cost and 5.5m is very fair number now that will only get better as it ages. 1 playoff goal in 25 games is just not gonna cut it in the top 6 on a legit contender.

That said between the media and fan shit and getting taken off of Pp1 for the likes of nick Ritchie and JVR and so on I wouldn’t blame him for wanting a fresh start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins
Ladyfan said:
Clearly, he did not
Click to expand...
Yup. I like Jake but he was off a lot of nights and its been what 9 years he needs a change of scenery and different team. We won the roster trade off with Vancouver they gave up huge assets for Lindholm and Zadorov all to just win 1 round and sign for Boston. They got Jake and PTO Heinen. Its a huge win for us. Anyone who would prefer to have JDB over Lindholm needs their heads examined.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gerrycheeversmask, RiverbottomChuck and shelbysdad
Bet Duclaire has a much better year and he was 4 years 14 mill. This contract will be Backes like IMO. Jake owes his agent a Ferrari for this
 
A lot of the people saying it’s an issue that JDB was too streaky and a head case are the same folks who made excuses for David Krejci when he’d do his Houdini disappearing act for long stretches. Weird how that is, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBruins and wintersej
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom